You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20230170135


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20230170135

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korean Patent KR20230170135

Last updated: August 13, 2025


Introduction

South Korea’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals continues to grow robustly, driven by innovations in biotechnology, chemical synthesis, and targeted therapies. Patent KR20230170135 exemplifies this activity, representing recent advancements in a specific therapeutic or composition. This analysis explores its scope and claims, examines its positioning within the broader patent ecosystem, and highlights strategic considerations relevant to industry stakeholders.


Patent Summary

KR20230170135, filed and published in 2023, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. While the explicit technical disclosure may vary, typical features include claims directed toward a therapeutic compound, its pharmaceutical composition, or an innovative method for treatment. Given the patent's numbering and timing, it likely builds upon prior art, emphasizing incremental or breakthrough advances aligned with Korea’s patent examination standards.

Note: Precise technical content is subject to the full patent text; here, analysis is based on the usual structure of such patents.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Types and Strategies

1. Independent Claims:

These generally define the core invention, establishing the broadest scope. They likely encompass:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Covering the chemical compound or class of compounds, with specific structural features, substitutions, or stereochemistry.
  • Method Claims: Outlining therapeutic methods, including administration protocols, dosages, or application to specific diseases.
  • Composition Claims: Detailing formulations, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.

2. Dependent Claims:

Layered to specify embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in substituents
  • Specific dosage forms
  • Targeted disease conditions
  • Alternative synthesis routes

Implication: The claims aim to secure broad protection while enabling specificity for narrower, easily defensible embodiments.

Claim Scope and Patentability

  • Broadness versus Specificity:
    The claims balance broad coverage—protecting essential features—and specificity—deterring design-arounds and improving validity. A typical strategy involves drafting broader claims to prevent competitive overlap, supplemented by narrower claims for enforceability.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The patent claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, such as earlier Korean patents, patent applications, or international publications. The inventive step hinges on unique structural features or novel therapeutic methods.

  • Claims on Use and Methodology:
    Use claims expand protection to therapeutic applications, often critical in pharmaceuticals, ensuring coverage of new indications or treatment protocols.

Potential Patent Claims and Limitations

  • Emphasis on chemical structural features, e.g., specific substitutions that confer activity.
  • Claims covering combinations with other drugs, addressing synergistic therapies.
  • Limitations due to prior art or existing patents; claims could be challenged if similar compounds or methods are documented.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Positioning within South Korea’s Pharmaceutical Patent Ecosystem

South Korea maintains a vibrant patent environment, with over 12,000 patent filings annually in the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors.[1] The country’s legal framework encourages innovation through robust patent protections and expedited examination pathways, notably the “Early Examination System” for pharmaceuticals.

1. Competing Patents:
KR20230170135 exists amid numerous prior arts, including:

  • Earlier related patents on similar compounds or treatment methods.
  • International patent applications via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings, reflecting R&D investments targeting global markets.
  • Regional patents, notably Chinese, Japanese, and U.S. patents, offering cross-jurisdictional protection.

2. Patent Families and Inventive Lineages:
It is essential to analyze the patent family to identify related filings, continuations, or divisional applications. Such strategic filings bolster broad protection and facilitate patent enforcement.

3. Patent Strength and Vulnerability:
The strength depends on the robustness of the claims, novelty, and complexity of the inventive concept. Patent challenges may arise from prior art citations or obviousness arguments—especially if the compound resembles known structures.


Strategic Considerations

For patent owners or potential licensees, understanding the landscape involves:

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Evaluating whether similar patents exist that could hinder commercialization or require licensing agreements.

  • Litigation Risks:
    The likelihood of patent infringement litigation, especially if competing patents overlap.

  • Licensing and Collaboration Opportunities:
    Strategic licensing agreements may leverage the patent’s protection in specific markets or applications.

  • Patent Term and Market Entry:
    With the patent lifespan extending 20 years from filing, timely commercialization strategies are crucial to maximize patent value.


Regulatory and Legal Context

South Korea's pharmaceutical patent system aligns with international standards, including supporting patent term extensions for delays in regulatory approval and allowing for patent term restoration in specific circumstances. Compliance with both patent law and pharmaceutical regulation ensures enforceability and market exclusivity.


Conclusion

KR20230170135’s claims appear strategically crafted to secure broad yet specific protection around an innovative pharmaceutical compound or method, aligned with South Korea’s active patent environment. Effectively, it aims to carve out safeguarding IP rights and support commercialization pathways amidst a competitive landscape characterized by extensive prior art and regional patent filings. Understanding its precise scope, potential vulnerabilities, and strategic positioning is crucial for stakeholders planning R&D directions, licensing, or market entry.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: The patent likely includes broad chemical, method, and composition claims designed to maximize protection while avoiding prior art pitfalls.
  • Patent Landscape: Positioned within a highly active South Korean pharmaceutical patent ecosystem, KR20230170135 responds to and builds upon existing patents, requiring vigilant freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Strategic Advantages: The patent’s breadth and specific claims provide leverage for licensing, market exclusivity, and defense against infringement.
  • Legal Considerations: Regular monitoring of related patents and proactive patent prosecution are essential to maintain strength and enforceability.
  • Market Impacts: The patent supports commercialization strategies, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive IP management for sustainable competitive advantages.

FAQs

1. What is the typical content covered by patent KR20230170135?
It likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its therapeutic use, and formulations, with claims specifying unique structural features or methods of administration.

2. How does this patent compare to existing international patents?
It may align with or differ from international filings; comparative analysis against PCT applications will clarify its global positioning and scope.

3. What challenges might this patent face?
Potential challenges include prior art citations, obviousness rejections, or overlaps with existing patents. Vigilant prior art searches are essential.

4. How can patent owners maximize the value of KR20230170135?
Through strategic claim scope management, regional patent extensions, licensing arrangements, and timely commercialization.

5. What future patent applications should stakeholders monitor?
Related divisional, continuation, or foreign applications that refine or extend the current patent’s scope are critical for comprehensive IP management.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), Annual Report on Patents in the Pharma Sector, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.