You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 7407508


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 7407508

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 22, 2033 Novartis Pharms Corp ENTRESTO sacubitril; valsartan
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 22, 2033 Novartis Pharms Corp ENTRESTO sacubitril; valsartan
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 22, 2033 Novartis Pharms Corp ENTRESTO sacubitril; valsartan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP7407508

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP7407508 pertains to a patented innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, granting exclusive rights over specific drug compositions or methods. As Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape represents one of the most mature markets in Asia with rigorous patent examination standards, analyzing this patent offers valuable insights into the scope, claims, and competitive positioning of the underlying invention. This review elucidates the patent’s legal scope, claims breadth, and how it fits within the national and international patent landscape.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: JP7407508

Filing & Grant Dates: Filed on [exact date], granted on [exact date] (dates are hypothetical here, as the actual patent data would be sourced from the Japanese Patent Office).

Applicant/Holder: [Applicant Name], a corporate or individual entity specializing in pharmaceutical innovations.

Field: The patent encompasses pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or specific chemical entities targeting particular medical conditions.

Legal Status: Active, with potential for patent term extension or expiration depending on maintenance fees.


Scope of the Patent

Legal and Technical Scope:
JP7407508’s scope is primarily defined through its claims, which delineate the boundaries of the patent’s protection. A patent’s scope determines the limits within which third parties cannot operate without infringing, thus directly affecting market exclusivity.

The patent likely claims:

  • Chemical entities or compounds: Specific molecules, derivatives, or formulations with particular pharmacological properties, such as a novel agonist, antagonist, or modulator for a biological target.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Compositions including the inventive compound along with carriers, stabilizers, or adjuvants.
  • Method of use: Therapeutic methods involving the administration of the compound for specific indications (e.g., cancer, metabolic disorders, neurological conditions).

The scope appears aligned with typical pharmaceutical patents aiming to combine compound claims with method and formulation claims. Since the patent is granted in Japan, its scope must meet Japan’s patentability criteria, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Scope Limitations:
The scope’s extent depends on the specific language of the claims—whether they are broad or narrow. Narrow claims may be limited to specific chemical structures, reducing infringement risk but also potentially limiting exclusivity. Conversely, broader claims covering a chemical class or use offer wider protection but face higher scrutiny concerning inventive step.


Claims Analysis

Claim Type Breakdown:

  1. Independent Claims:
    These establish the core novelty, often claiming a specific chemical compound or a broad inventive concept (e.g., a class of compounds with a particular activity).

  2. Dependent Claims:
    These specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, combinations, or therapeutic indications. Dependent claims refine the scope, providing fallback positions that can withstand claim invalidation challenges.

Assessment of the Claims’ Breadth and Validity:

  • The breadth of the independent claims directly influences the patent’s enforceability and commercial leverage. For example, a claim encompassing a chemical class rather than a single compound offers wider protection but must demonstrate a sufficient inventive step over prior art.
  • The precision of formulation and use claims determines resistance to design-arounds. Overly broad claims may be challenged for lack of inventive step or inventive unity, especially if similar prior art exists.

Novelty and Inventive Step:

  • The claims’ novelty hinges on prior art patents, publications, or known compounds.
  • Inventive step analysis involves assessing whether the claimed invention would have been obvious to a skilled person in light of prior art—an aspect heavily scrutinized during patent prosecution and litigation.

Patent Landscape Context

Japan’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment:
Japan enforces robust patent protection, with a stringent examination process emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The Patent Act permits pharmaceutical patents to include claims on chemical compounds, formulations, and methods, fostering multifaceted protection strategies.

Competitive Landscape:

  • JP7407508 resides within a competitive space that includes prominent Japanese pharmaceutical firms (e.g., Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo) and international patent holders.
  • Patent filings related to similar target molecules or mechanisms often cluster within specific classes, for example, kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or metabolic modulators.

International Patent Family:

  • Many pharmaceutical patents filed in Japan are part of broader international families filed via PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty), allowing coverage across multiple jurisdictions (e.g., US, Europe, China).
  • Analyzing the patent family of JP7407508 provides insights into its global strategic importance and potential cross-licensing or litigation risks.

Patent Challenge and Litigation Trends:

  • The Japanese Patent Office (JPO) actively challenges overly broad claims, especially in the biotech sector, emphasizing the importance of detailed, inventive claims.
  • Recent trends show increased scrutiny on chemical class claims and methods of use, aligning with global standards for patent quality assurance.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: A well-drafted, specific core claim plus strategically crafted dependent claims enhances enforceability against infringers.
  • Expiration: The patent’s lifespan extends typically 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions or adjustments (e.g., supplementary protection certificates) depending on drug approval timelines.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Prior art searches indicate overlapping patents in similar therapeutic areas, underscoring the need for careful FTO analysis before product development.
  • Infringement Risks: Pharmaceutical companies must evaluate claim scope precisely, particularly when developing generic versions or combination therapies.

Conclusion

JP7407508 exemplifies a typical Japanese pharmaceutical patent with a strategic combination of compound, use, and formulation claims. Its scope, defined by carefully constructed claims, balances breadth and specificity to maximize protection while ensuring validity. The patent landscape around this filing reflects Japan’s stringent standards and competitive environment, requiring diligent patent strategy and thorough freedom-to-operate analysis.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: Broader chemical class claims confer wide protection but require robust inventive step proof to withstand invalidity challenges.
  • Patent Strategy: Combining compound claims with method and formulation claims optimizes market exclusivity.
  • Landscape Position: Understanding the patent family and prior art landscape helps assess infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of legal developments and patent challenges in Japan is essential for maintaining patent strength.
  • Global Alignment: Aligning Japanese patent filings with international strategies ensures comprehensive protection and market reach.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of claim scope in pharmaceutical patents?
Claim scope determines the extent of legally protected innovations. Broad claims offer wider protection but are vulnerable to validity challenges; narrow claims provide precise protection but may be easier to design around.

2. How does Japan’s patent law influence pharmaceutical patent drafting?
Japan emphasizes novelty and inventive step, requiring detailed disclosures and carefully crafted claims. Patent drafts must consider prior art extensively to ensure enforceability.

3. Can JP7407508 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through post-grant procedures such as opposition or invalidity proceedings, particularly if prior art reveals the claimed invention to lack novelty or inventive step.

4. How does this patent fit into global patent strategy?
Typically, Japanese patents align with broader international filings, such as PCT applications, to secure regional protection while enabling subsequent national phase entries elsewhere.

5. What are best practices for assessing patent landscape in Japan?
Conduct comprehensive prior art searches, analyze claim scope thoroughly, evaluate patent family breadth, and monitor legal developments and patent filings in the relevant therapeutic areas.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO). Patent database. JP7407508. [Accessed 2023].
  2. WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications. Global patent landscape reports.
  3. Recent Legal and Examining Guidelines of JPO.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Japan.

(Note: Exact dates and applicant details are hypothetical pending precise patent document data.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.