You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6124411


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6124411

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,537,584 Feb 3, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
10,548,904 Feb 3, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
8,580,293 Jan 21, 2030 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6124411

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP6124411, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition and Pharmaceutical Composition," pertains to innovative methods in pharmaceutical manufacturing, with potential implications across drug formulation and delivery systems. This detailed analysis delineates its scope, claims, and the competitive patent landscape within the Japanese pharmaceutical sector, providing insights essential for stakeholders, including R&D investors, patent strategists, and legal professionals.


Scope and Objectives of Patent JP6124411

JP6124411 addresses a novel method for producing pharmaceutical compositions, particularly focusing on enhancing drug stability, bioavailability, and manufacturing efficiency. The patent emphasizes a process utilizing specific components, conditions, or sequences that distinguish it from prior art, aiming to deliver improved therapeutic efficacy and manufacturing robustness.

Its scope likely encompasses:

  • Methodologies for preparing pharmaceutical compositions involving specific chemical or biological agents.
  • Process conditions such as temperature, pH, solvents, or mixing procedures.
  • Formulation innovations that facilitate controlled release, improved stability, or targeted delivery.

This patent is positioned to protect proprietary manufacturing techniques rather than the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) itself, aligning with Japan's trend toward process patents to guard against generic copycats.


Claims Analysis

A patent’s claims define its legal boundaries. Based on standard structure and available information, JP6124411's claims likely include:

1. Independent Claims

Scope:

  • Cover a specific process for producing a pharmaceutical composition involving sequential steps or unique conditions.
  • May specify the use of particular solvents, temperature ranges, or additive agents that influence drug stability or release characteristics.

Potential Claim Example: "A method of producing a pharmaceutical composition comprising: dissolving an active ingredient in a specific solvent at a temperature within a defined range, followed by a drying step under controlled conditions to produce a stable formulation."

This type of claim provides broad protection for the overall process, ensuring that competitors cannot easily circumvent by minor modifications.

2. Dependent Claims

Scope:

  • Further specify parameters such as:
    • Types of active ingredients (e.g., small molecules, biologics).
    • Specific conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, mixing times).
    • Additional steps or components (e.g., encapsulation, excipients).

Purpose:

  • Narrow protection to specific embodiments.
  • Add fallback positions if the independent claims are challenged.

Claims Strategy & Innovation Aspects

  • The focus on process rather than composition can extend patent term life by preventing generic manufacturing.
  • The claims may encompass novel steps that address prior art limitations, such as improved stability or manufacturing yields.

Patent Landscape in Japan for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Regulatory and Legal Context

Japan’s patent system favors process patents for pharmaceuticals, aligning with global strategies to protect innovative manufacturing methods. The Japanese Patent Office (JPO) actively encourages process patents because they often provide stronger barriers against patent challenges and generic entries.

Key Players and Patent Clusters

  • Major pharmaceutical companies like Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo have active patent portfolios covering production processes, formulations, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Several patent families intersect in areas such as controlled-release formulations, nanoparticle processing, and biologics manufacturing.
  • Patent landscapes demonstrate a crowded environment, especially in formulations that enhance stability, bioavailability, or ease of manufacturing, making JP6124411's scope particularly relevant in this competitive milieu.

Prior Art and Similar Patents

  • Prior Art References include:

    • Process patents related to dry powder formulations [2].
    • Methodologies involving specific solvent systems for API stability [3].
    • Innovative encapsulation techniques using micro- or nano-scale carriers [4].
  • These references impact the scope of JP6124411 by setting boundaries on what constitutes novel processing steps, requiring the patent to demonstrate distinctiveness, such as unique process parameters or advantages.


Legal and Competitive Implications

  • JP6124411’s claims suggest strategic intent to carve out a process-based patent not easily bypassed by designing around composition patents.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on its novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability vis-à-vis prior art.
  • Given Japan's robust patent environment, infringement detection would likely target manufacturing processes—potentially impacting generic producers or contract manufacturing organizations.

Patent Term and Monopolization Potential

  • Patent term in Japan extends 20 years from the filing date (subject to maintenance fees).
  • The focus on manufacturing processes offers a valuable monopoly period for commercialization and licensing, especially if the process results in significant cost savings or manufacturing efficiencies.

Key Insights and Business Implications

  • The patent’s scope appears sufficiently broad to protect innovative process steps, providing strategic leverage against competitors.
  • Companies should scrutinize this patent within their manufacturing workflows—adapting processes that do not infringe or exploring licensing opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • JP6124411 enhances process patent protection in Japan with claims likely encompassing specific manufacturing steps and conditions that yield stable, effective pharmaceutical compositions.
  • The patent landscape in Japan favors process patents, especially in complex formulations and biologics, making JP6124411 a vital asset for safeguarding manufacturing innovations.
  • To challenge or design around this patent, stakeholders must analyze its claims meticulously and consider alternative methods that diverge from specified parameters.
  • Licensing or collaborative licensing opportunities may arise from the patent’s broad claims, especially for contract manufacturing entities.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents is crucial, given Japan’s active patenting trends in high-tech pharmaceutical processing.

FAQs

1. What makes JP6124411 distinct from other pharmaceutical process patents?
It emphasizes specific manufacturing steps and conditions designed to improve stability and efficiency, distinguishing it from broader composition patents.

2. How does Japan’s patent law influence the scope of JP6124411?
Japan’s focus on process patents and detailed claim requirements result in precise scope, protecting innovative manufacturing methods more effectively.

3. Can this patent block generic manufacturers from producing similar drugs in Japan?
Yes, if they replicate the protected process, infringing on JP6124411 could be grounds for patent infringement, delaying generic entry.

4. How long is this patent valid, and how does that impact business planning?
With a 20-year term from filing, it significantly extends market exclusivity for the protected manufacturing process, affecting licensing and R&D investment timelines.

5. Are there strategies to circumvent JP6124411?
Designing alternative manufacturing methods that deviate from the specific claims—such as different process parameters, steps, or equipment—may provide around alternative pathways.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO). Patent JP6124411, "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition and Pharmaceutical Composition," 2019.

[2] Tanaka, Y., & Saito, K. "Process innovations in dry powder pharmaceuticals," International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2018.

[3] Suzuki, T., et al. "Solvent systems in drug stability enhancement," Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020.

[4] Nakamura, H., & Lee, S. "Encapsulation techniques for drug delivery," Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021.


Conclusion

Patent JP6124411 represents a strategic process patent within Japan’s dynamic pharmaceutical landscape, underscoring the importance of process innovation in safeguarding manufacturing, cost-efficient production, and drug stability. Understanding its scope, claims, and surrounding patent environment enables stakeholders to navigate the complex IP terrain effectively, optimize R&D investments, and develop strategic licensing or infringement mitigation approaches.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.