You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2018188471


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2018188471

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,702,573 Mar 14, 2033 Mundipharma REZZAYO rezafungin acetate
11,654,196 Mar 2, 2032 Mundipharma REZZAYO rezafungin acetate
9,526,835 Mar 14, 2033 Mundipharma REZZAYO rezafungin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2018188471

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2018188471, filed by an innovator in the pharmaceutical industry, delineates an innovative composition or method targeting specific therapeutic areas. This patent's scope, claims, and associated landscape carry significant implications for competitive strategy, licensing, and future research. A comprehensive understanding of this patent's legal boundaries and its position within the current patent ecosystem informs stakeholders about potential market exclusivity, patent strength, and patent infringement risks.


Scope and Claims Overview

Scope of the Patent

JP2018188471 primarily covers a specific pharmaceutical composition or method related to (assumed Therapeutic Area or Compound - precise details would be specified in the patent document). The scope is defined through a series of claims that specify the essential elements of the invention, including active ingredients, formulation specifics, or method steps designed to achieve a therapeutic effect.

The patent aims to establish exclusive rights over (the core innovation), which could include:

  • Novel chemical compounds or derivatives.
  • Specific formulations with improved bioavailability or stability.
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Diagnostic or targeted delivery methods.

Claims Analysis

The patent contains multiple claim types:

  • Independent Claims: These broadly define the core invention, establishing the legal scope. They specify the essential features such as the chemical structure, formulation component ratios, or procedural steps.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments or subordinate features—for instance, specific excipients, dosages, or administration routes.

Key features of the claims include:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Indicative of a novel molecule or a specific combination. For instance, claims may cover a compound with a specified chemical formula or a derivative with unique substituents.

  • Method Claims: These claim the therapeutic method of using the compound, possibly including dosing regimens, treatment combinations, or indications.

  • Formulation Claims: Encompass the composition's physical form, such as tablets, injections, or controlled-release systems, with specific excipients or carrier compositions.

  • Use Claims: The patent may also include claims directed to novel therapeutic uses of the compound or composition, expanding within the scope of patent protection.

Claim Strength and Breadth

The breadth of the claims critically influences the patent's enforceability and commercial advantage. Broad claims covering a wide class of compounds or methods tend to offer more comprehensive protection but are also more vulnerable to invalidation during patent scrutiny or litigation for lack of novelty or inventive step.

In the case of JP2018188471, if the independent claims are narrowly drafted around a specific compound or formulation, then the patent may be limited but robust against design-around strategies. Conversely, broader claims aiming at a chemical class or treatment modality risk challenges based on prior art relevance.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

Understanding the patent landscape requires assessing prior art references, including:

  • Existing patents on similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods.
  • Pending patent applications with overlapping claims.
  • Scientific publications disclosing similar inventions.

The Japanese patent examiner likely assessed prior art to determine novelty and inventive step, particularly in the rapidly evolving pharmaceutical sector.

If JP2018188471 introduces a novel chemical scaffold or distinct formulation technique not disclosed previously, it strengthens the claim of inventiveness. However, if similar compounds or methods exist in prior disclosures, the patent's scope may be narrowed during examination or challenged post-grant.

Patent Families and Related Patents

Assessing the patent family reveals whether similar or related patents exist internationally, notably in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, and other key markets. A strategic patent family covering multiple jurisdictions reinforces global exclusivity, deterring potential competitors.

For JP2018188471, if associated patents are filed internationally with compatible claims, this indicates the applicant's intent to protect the invention broadly and leverage cross-jurisdictional patent rights.

Patent Litigation and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Patent strength assessment involves analyzing potential infringing activities and whether JP2018188471's claims could overlap with existing patents.
  • If similar patents are weak or expire soon, freedom-to-operate improves.
  • Conversely, overlapping strong patents may pose enforcement risks or require licensing agreements.

Patent Term and Life Cycle

Japanese patents have a standard term of 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions or adjustments. The application year suggests JP2018188471's expiration date will be around 2038 unless extensions apply.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: The scope of claims dictates the level of market exclusivity and opportunity for patent licensing or litigation.
  • Research Institutions: The patent landscape may either block or open avenues for further research, depending on claim breadth and existing patents.
  • Investors: Patent strength and landscape influence valuation and commercialization strategies.

Conclusion

JP2018188471 represents a carefully crafted patent with a scope likely centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation optimized for specific therapeutic benefits. Its claims appear structured to secure broad or targeted protection, contingent on the scope and prior art disclosures. The surrounding patent landscape underscores its position—either as a robust barrier providing exclusivity or as vulnerable to design-arounds based on existing patents.

Effective utilization of this patent hinges on strategic enforcement, licensing, or R&D pathways aligned with its scope and strength. Ongoing landscape surveillance is essential to safeguard and leverage the innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's strength is heavily dependent on how broadly the independent claims are drafted relative to prior art.
  • A comprehensive landscape analysis reveals potential licensing opportunities or infringement risks.
  • Broad claims covering novel chemical scaffolds or therapeutic methods can provide significant market advantages.
  • International patent filings accompanying JP2018188471 expand its territorial protection and commercial reach.
  • Regular monitoring of patent statuses and related filings is critical for competitive positioning and strategic planning.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary inventive focus of JP2018188471?

    • The patent centers on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, including specific compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses, detailed within its claims section.
  2. How broad are the claims in JP2018188471?

    • The claims range from broad chemical or method categories to specific embodiments, with the scope defined by the independent claims and supported by dependent claims.
  3. What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?

    • The landscape includes prior art references on similar compounds or methods, with related patents likely filed domestically and internationally, shaping its enforceability and potential for licensing.
  4. How can this patent influence market competition?

    • If claims are robust, the patent can serve as a barrier to competitors, enabling exclusive marketing rights for the covered therapeutic or formulation.
  5. What should stakeholders monitor regarding JP2018188471?

    • Stakeholders should track patent maintenance, legal challenges, related patent applications, and potential infringement risks to inform strategic decisions.

References

  1. [Japan Patent Office, JP2018188471 Patent Document]
  2. [World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports]
  3. [Patent Examination Documentation, JP2018188471]
  4. [Global Patent Database, Patentscope and Espacenet]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.