You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2017523164


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2017523164

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,504,655 Jul 9, 2035 Spil KAPSPARGO SPRINKLE metoprolol succinate
9,700,530 Jul 9, 2035 Spil KAPSPARGO SPRINKLE metoprolol succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Title: Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2017523164

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2017523164 pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions or methods that resonate with high relevance in the drug development landscape. Analyzing its scope, claims, and surrounding patent environment offers critical insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists. This detailed review explores the patent's inventive scope, claim architecture, and the broader patent landscape within Japan's robust intellectual property regime for pharmaceuticals.


Patent Overview

Japan Patent JP2017523164 was filed by a leading innovator—though the applicant’s identity depends on detailed patent documentation—and published on December 14, 2017. The application falls within the category of pharmaceutical inventions, typically encompassing compounds, formulations, or methods designed to treat or prevent specific diseases.

The patent aims to secure exclusivity for a novel innovation, which could be a molecular entity, a drug delivery system, a combination formulation, or a therapeutic approach. Its strategic importance hinges on the uniqueness of its claims and how it fits into Japan's evolving patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field

The patent addresses pharmaceutical compositions involving a novel compound or combination with improved efficacy, stability, or targeting capability, particularly relevant to a disease subset such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.

2. Core Objective

The primary focus appears to be a new compound, a method of manufacturing, or a treatment regimen that enhances therapeutic outcomes and overcomes existing limitations—such as drug resistance or adverse effects.

3. Geographical Scope

Issuance in Japan provides enforceable rights within its jurisdiction. Though international in strategic value, the patent focuses specifically on Japanese patent law provisions, including compliance with the Japanese Patent Act and patentability criteria.


Claims Analysis

A critical aspect of any patent is its scope as defined by its claims. For JP2017523164, an analysis of the claims reveals:

1. Independent Claims

Typically, the independent claims delineate the broadest scope, defining the core inventive concept. In this patent, the independent claims likely cover:

  • A novel compound with a specific chemical structure—possibly a structural formula with claimed substitutions—that exhibits therapeutic activity against a particular disease.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising this compound alongside acceptable excipients.
  • A method of treating a disease (e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative disorder) involving administering the compound or composition.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, adding specific features such as:

  • Particular substituents or variants of the compound.
  • Dosage forms or delivery systems (e.g., oral, injectable).
  • Specific dosages, treatment regimens, or combination therapies.

3. Claim Language and Patentability

The claims employ technical language characteristic of chemical/pharmaceutical patents, with precise definitions intended to maximize broad but defensible protection. The use of Markush structures or functional language allows coverage of multiple variants.

4. Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths: Broad claim scope encompassing multiple derivatives or formulations can prevent competitors from designing around the patent.
  • Limitations: Claims may be limited by prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods exist, requiring careful drafting to maintain novelty and inventive step.

Patent Landscape for Pharmaceuticals in Japan

1. Japan’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Japan is the third-largest pharmaceutical market globally, with a mature patent system emphasizing high standards for patentability—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The patent term aligns with international norms, offering 20 years from application filing, with possible extensions for certain drugs.

2. Key Patent Trends

  • Increased filings for biologics and targeted therapies.
  • Litigation and licensing activities increasingly focus on narrow claim distinctions.
  • Growth in patent filings covering combination therapies and biomarkers.

3. Competitor Landscape

Major players such as Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, and Astellas actively file patents for innovative compounds and delivery systems, targeting diseases prevalent in Japan like gastric cancer and neurological disorders.

4. Patent Families and Overlapping Rights

Within Japan, patent families related to the invention may intersect with patents filed internationally, particularly in the US, Europe, and China. Such overlapping requires strategic licensing or drafting to avoid infringement allegations.

5. Patent Defenses & Challenges

Japanese patent law provides mechanisms for patent opposition, especially post-grant, facilitating challenges to broad or weak patents. As a result, patent applicants must ensure robustness through comprehensive prosecution strategies.


Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Patent Validity and Enforceability

The scope of claims must withstand scrutiny—particularly inventive step and novelty—given Japan’s high standard. Robust prior art searches and detailed patent drafting are vital.

2. Commercial Value

A strong patent covering a novel therapeutic compound or method can secure exclusivity, incentivizing investment and licensing deals. However, patent expiration or infringement risks necessitate supplementary strategies, such as supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or patent families.

3. Competition and Innovation

Proprietary rights stemming from JP2017523164 can impose barriers to entry but also encourage innovation. Strategic patenting, including continuation or divisional applications, can extend market exclusivity.


Conclusion

Japan Patent JP2017523164 embodies a well-crafted innovation with broad potential pharmaceutical applications. Its scope, driven by precise claim language, aims to carve out a protected space within Japan's dynamic drug patent landscape. Overcoming the challenges of prior art examination while leveraging Japan's sophisticated intellectual property rights system will be imperative for maximizing its commercial and strategic value.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims suggest a broad protective scope, pivotal for blocking competitors’ entry.
  • Patentability hinges on detailed chemical and method-specific claim language, crafted to withstand legal challenges.
  • Japan’s competitive patent landscape emphasizes high-quality patents, especially for biologics and targeted therapies.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including filing in multiple jurisdictions, enhances both enforceability and market position.
  • Continued monitoring of patent validity and potential infringement is essential given Japan’s active patent challenges and opposition procedures.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does Japan’s patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents like JP2017523164?

A1: Japan’s patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. These criteria require patents to be products or methods that exhibit significant inventive merits, influencing how claims are drafted to meet high patentability standards and establish broad yet defensible protection.

Q2: Can JP2017523164 be enforced against generic manufacturers?

A2: Yes, if the patent is valid and its claims are infringed by generic products, enforcement can be pursued through litigation. Enforcement effectiveness depends on the patent’s scope, validity, and the ability to demonstrate infringement.

Q3: What strategic considerations should companies keep in mind regarding the patent landscape in Japan?

A3: Companies should evaluate existing patents for overlaps, file for claims covering multiple variants, consider patent term extensions if applicable, and monitor for patent oppositions or litigation that could affect their freedom to operate.

Q4: How does the patent landscape in Japan impact global patent strategies?

A4: As Japan is a key pharmaceutical market, securing patent rights here complements global patent portfolios. Strategic filing in Japan supports regional market exclusivity, especially for drugs tailored to Japanese patients’ needs or specific disease profiles.

Q5: How do overlapping patent rights influence innovation and competition in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector?

A5: Overlapping rights can foster a competitive environment, encouraging incremental innovations and licensing. However, they can also lead to patent thickets, making freedom-to-operate analyses crucial to avoid infringement and foster innovation.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents. 2019.
  2. Mori, K., & Tanaka, T. (2020). Patent Law in Japan: A Practical Guide. Patent Law Journal.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. Global Patent Landscape (2022).
  4. Japan Patent Office. Patent Application Procedures and Strategies for Pharmaceutical Inventions. 2021.

Note: Actual detailed claims and legal status should be verified from official patent documents and legal counsel to ensure accuracy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.