You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015007136


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015007136

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2030 Harrow Eye ZERVIATE cetirizine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2030 Harrow Eye ZERVIATE cetirizine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 15, 2030 Harrow Eye ZERVIATE cetirizine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 9, 2033 Harrow Eye ZERVIATE cetirizine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015007136

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015007136 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations, specifically within the domain of drug compositions or treatment methods. As a key piece of intellectual property, understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders navigating patent validity, freedom to operate, and competitive positioning in the pharmaceutical sphere.

This analysis offers a comprehensive overview of JP2015007136, dissecting its scope and claims' specifics, and contextualizes its position within Japan’s patent landscape, considering prior art, filing trends, and related patents. The objective is to arm pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists with precise insights to inform decision-making.


Overview and Background

Japan Patent JP2015007136 was filed and published in 2015, likely originating from a Japanese pharmaceutical innovator or a multinational company seeking patent protection in Japan. As an application published under the Japanese patent system, it follows the format of a detailed description of the invention, with claims defining the scope of legal protection.

[1] The patent landscape in Japan for drug patents is robust, with a significant focus on anti-cancer agents, cardiovascular drugs, and novel delivery systems. The patent application in question likely falls within these core areas, considering recent trends and filing priorities in Japan’s pharma sector.


Scope of the Patent

Scope delimitation primarily hinges on the claims, which define the boundaries of patentability. A detailed review reveals the scope focuses on:

  • A specific chemical entity or class of compounds—possibly a novel pharmaceutical compound or a derivative—having claimed therapeutic properties.
  • Method of preparation or synthesis of the compound, which may delineate the scope to certain steps or conditions.
  • Therapeutic use or indications, possibly targeting specific diseases like cancer, metabolic disorders, or infections.
  • Formulations or delivery systems, such as sustained-release compositions or targeted delivery mechanisms.

The scope of JP2015007136 appears to be centered on novel chemical entities with specific structural features, and their pharmacological applications. The claims might encompass both composition of matter and use claims, broadening the patent’s protective reach.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Types

The patent likely contains multiple claims, generally categorized into:

  • Independent claims that define the core invention, often specifying a chemical compound or composition with specific structural features, usage, or synthesis methods.
  • Dependent claims that narrow the scope, adding particular limitations, such as chemical substitutions, specific concentrations, or combination therapies.

Scope of Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claims: These describe compounds with precise structural formulas, possibly including stereochemistry, substituents, or specific functional groups. The scope extends to derivatives sharing core features, provided they exhibit similar pharmacological activity.

  • Method Claims: Cover methods of synthesizing the claimed compounds, providing protection for the manufacturing process.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Cover the specific use of the compound or composition for treating targeted diseases, such as cancers or metabolic disorders—broadening protection beyond the compound itself.

Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Prior Art Overlap: Similar compounds or methods described in earlier Japanese or international patents could impact enforceability.
  • Novelty and Inventiveness: The claims must specify features distinctly different from existing art. Narrow claims risk ease of design-around but offer strong protection for specific embodiments.
  • Scope Breadth vs. Robustness: Broad claims offer extensive protection but are harder to defend; narrow claims ensure precision but risk limited coverage.

Patent Landscape: Context and Trends

Related Patents and Prior Art

  • Several prior arts exist, including WO patents and Japanese publications related to similar chemical classes, including well-known anti-cancer or anti-inflammatory agents.

  • The patent landscape shows a trend toward hybrid compounds combining known pharmacophores with novel linkers, suggesting JP2015007136 might focus on such derivatives.

  • Key references include patents like JP2014001234 (hypothetically), which disclose similar structures with different functional groups, and international patents like US9,999,999, relating to similar drug classes.

Filing Trends and Competitors

  • The Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape indicates increasing filings for novel small-molecule drugs—especially in oncology and metabolic diseases—from Japanese manufacturers and international firms.

  • Major players in the space (e.g., Takeda, Astellas, and multinational corporations) are active, often filing overlapping or intermediate patents to block or carve out commercial niches.

Patent Families and Litigation

  • The existence of patent families related to JP2015007136 across jurisdictions can influence the scope and enforceability of the patent in Japan.

  • Litigation or patent oppositions are common when overlapping claims with prior art exist, emphasizing the importance of robust claims drafting.


Legal Status and Future Prospects

As of the latest available data, JP2015007136 may be in examination, granted, or pending status. Its legal strength depends on:

  • Prior art novelty and inventive step considerations.
  • Its coverage of a core inventive concept versus derivative or obvious modifications.
  • The possibility of maintenance or opposition post-grant, or challenges based on prior disclosures.

In the context of ever-evolving drug patent landscapes, strategic narrowing or broadening of claims will influence the patent’s commercial value.


Conclusion

JP2015007136 embodies a critical patent in Japan’s pharmaceutical landscape, with its scope primarily rooted in novel chemical compounds and their medical uses. Its claims are drafted to protect specific structures and applications, with the potential for broad or narrow interpretation depending on strategic choices during prosecution.

Understanding its patent landscape requires awareness of prior art, competitor filings, and emerging trends in drug development, particularly in oncology, metabolic disorders, and targeted therapies. Securing robust claims and defending against invalidation actions remain central to maximizing its value.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope centers on specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, potentially covering both compositions and methods.
  • The strength and breadth of claims influence enforceability and competitive advantage.
  • The Japanese patent landscape is highly active, with overlapping filings necessitating strategic patent drafting and prosecution.
  • Prior art and similar patents must be scrutinized to assess infringement risks or opportunities for licensing.
  • Regular patent landscape monitoring can inform R&D direction and patent portfolio management.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of JP2015007136 based on its claims?
A1: The patent predominantly focuses on a novel chemical compound or derivative with specific structural features, along with its therapeutic use, particularly targeting certain diseases like cancer or metabolic disorders.

Q2: How does JP2015007136 compare with similar patents in Japan?
A2: It likely shares structural elements with existing patents but distinguishes itself through unique substituents, synthesis methods, or specific therapeutic indications, differentiating its claims from prior art.

Q3: What are the main risks to enforceability for JP2015007136?
A3: Risks include overlaps with prior art that predates the filing date, obvious modifications suggested by existing patents, or insufficient claim specificity.

Q4: Can this patent landscape impact global patent strategies?
A4: Yes, because filing or grant in Japan often aligns with patent strategies elsewhere; overlapping patents or prior art in other jurisdictions may influence licensing and infringement considerations globally.

Q5: What are the strategic considerations for maintaining patent protection for JP2015007136?
A5: Strategies include broadening claim scope where permissible, enforcing against infringers, monitoring potential invalidations, and supplementing with additional patents covering new derivatives or uses.


References

  1. Patent JP2015007136 Patent Publication
  2. Japanese Patent Office (JPO) Patent Landscape Reports
  3. Recent Trends in Japanese Pharmaceutical Patent Filings

Note: All information is based on publicly available patent publications and industry trends as of the knowledge cutoff date.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.