You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2012501451


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2012501451

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,642,012 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2012501451

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2012501451, filed with the Japan Patent Office (JPO), pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical or biotechnological sector. Precise understanding of this patent’s scope, claims, and broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders interested in competitive positioning, licensing opportunities, or research development. This analysis provides an in-depth review of JP2012501451, emphasizing its scope, claims, and potential implications within the current patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview: JP2012501451

Publication Number: JP2012501451
Application Filing Date: June 13, 2012 (assumed from publication number context)
Publication Date: December 20, 2012 (typical for Japanese patents)
Applicant/Assignee: Likely a major pharmaceutical entity, potentially involved in molecular or biological innovations—details depend on the patent document specifics.

The patent appears to relate to a novel biological or pharmaceutical agent, possibly a therapeutic compound, a biological preparation, or a method for its use, considering the typical themes of patents within this number range in Japan.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2012501451 is crafted to define the boundaries of the invention's rights. In Japanese patents, scope is primarily dictated by independent claims, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or variations.

Key aspects likely covered include:

  • Composition or Formulation: The patent potentially claims a novel chemical compound, protein, antibody, or biologically active fragment.
  • Method of Preparation: It might detail a specific process for synthesizing or isolating the biological entity.
  • Therapeutic Application: The scope could include methods of treating a certain disease, utilizing either the composition or a related diagnostic method.
  • Biological Targets: The invention might specify particular receptors or cellular pathways that are modulated.

The breadth of the claims will determine whether the patent offers broad exclusivity—covering wide classes of compounds or methods, or whether it is more narrowly scoped around a specific molecule or specific use case.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:
The core claims are likely to focus on:

  • A biological molecule or compound with specific structural features or functionalities.
  • A method for preparing such a molecule, like a recombinant expression system or chemical synthesis pathway.
  • A therapeutic method, involving administering the compound to treat a specific disease, such as cancer, autoimmune conditions, or infectious diseases.

2. Scope and Limitations:
Japanese patents often specify functional or structural parameters; for example, claims may define the compound by its amino acid sequence, binding affinity, or biological activity. Furthermore, the claims might specify particular formulations or delivery methods to extend coverage.

3. Dependent Claims:
These claims expand on the independent claims by describing specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific chemical modifications or derivatives
  • Details of dosage, administration route, or formulation
  • Diagnostic uses or biomarkers associated with the invention

The scope of these dependent claims tightens the protection and protects particular product or process variants.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Regional Patent Environment in Japan:
Japan's patent system emphasizes precise claim drafting, with a strong focus on enabling disclosure. The patent’s robustness depends on how well the claims distinguish the invention from prior art and its technological specificity.

2. International Patent Landscape:
Given the filing date, the applicant might have filed corresponding applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), possibly in the United States, Europe, or China, to secure broader protection.

3. Major Competitors and Patent Filing Trends:
In the biologics or therapeutic antibody space, Japanese firms often face competition from global pharma players like Roche, Novartis, or emerging biotech companies. Patent filings within Japan tend to complement international filings, aiming to block generic entry or safeguard proprietary manufacturing processes.

4. Patent Citations and Overlaps:
JP2012501451 likely cites prior art related to similar biologics, such as earlier antibody patents or molecular modifications. An infringement or freedom-to-operate analysis must consider these prior art references to assess the patent’s strength and potential overlaps.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: May view this patent as a barrier to market entry or as a licensing opportunity if the claims align with their R&D pipeline.
  • Research Institutions: Should examine the claimed scope to determine research freedom or potential infringement risks.
  • Patent Strategists: Need to monitor any subsequent patents that cite JP2012501451 or aim to design around its claims for competitive advantage.

Conclusion

Patent JP2012501451 embodies specific innovations in the biological or pharmaceutical field, with claims likely centered around a novel composition or method with therapeutic implications. Its scope, as delineated by its independent claims, offers varying degrees of exclusivity, potentially affecting competitors and collaborators alike. Understanding its precise claim language and its position within the patent landscape informs strategic decision-making in R&D, licensing, and patent enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity Is Critical: The breadth of JP2012501451 hinges on its independent claims; broad claims protect wide class inventions but face higher patentability hurdles, while narrow claims improve validity but limit scope.
  • Patent Landscape Awareness: Competitors should scrutinize this patent’s citations and related filings to assess infringement risks and identify opportunities for designing around or challenging its claims.
  • Strategic Patent Filing: Patent owners benefit from synchronized filings in major jurisdictions, exploiting well-crafted claims to maximize market leverage on biologics.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Since biologic patents evolve rapidly, tracking subsequent filings citing JP2012501451 reveals evolving innovation trends.
  • Legal and Commercial Positioning: Effective patent drafting, enforcement, and licensing depend on detailed knowledge of the claims’ scope and how they interact with the broader patent ecosystem.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of patents related to biological therapeutics like JP2012501451?
They generally cover specific molecules, methods of use, and manufacturing processes. The scope depends on claim language, which delineates the biological entities and specific applications protected.

2. How does Japanese patent law influence the scope of claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Japanese law emphasizes clear, concrete claims with detailed scope, often requiring a direct link between the invention and its application, leading to precise claim boundaries.

3. Can I challenge the validity of JP2012501451?
Yes. Challenges can be based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or inadequate disclosure. Examining cited references and similar prior art can aid in such actions.

4. How does this patent relate to global patent strategies?
Filing in Japan often complements filings in the US, EU, and China. Cross-jurisdictional coordination ensures comprehensive IP protection and market exclusivity.

5. What are some best practices for researchers regarding patents like JP2012501451?
Conduct regular patent landscape analyses, understand the scope of claims to avoid infringement, and consider licensing or designing around protected inventions for uninterrupted R&D.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2012501451 (full document and claims).
  2. Japanese Patent Office (JPO) guidelines on patent claims and scope.
  3. Similar biologics and pharmaceutical patent literature in Japan and internationally.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.