You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 4093379


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 4093379

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,202,778 Jan 22, 2041 Handa Therap PHYRAGO dasatinib
11,298,356 Jan 22, 2041 Handa Therap PHYRAGO dasatinib
11,324,745 Jan 22, 2041 Handa Therap PHYRAGO dasatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP4093379

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP4093379 pertains to innovative drug compositions or methods related to medicinal applications, as recorded in the European Patent Office (EPO) database. A comprehensive understanding of this patent involves analyzing its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape. Such analysis aids pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities in strategic decision-making, patent infringement risk assessment, and competitive intelligence.


Scope of Patent EP4093379

EP4093379's scope is defined primarily by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention. The patent’s scope determines the extent of exclusivity conferred upon the patent holder and influences licensing, litigation, and patent licensing strategies.

Core Focus:
The patent covers specific drug formulations, delivery mechanisms, or methods for treating particular conditions—most likely within the therapeutic or pharmaceutical sphere.

Geographical Coverage:
As an EPC (European Patent Convention) patent, EP4093379 provides protection within the European Patent Organisation territories, including major markets such as Germany, France, the UK, and others. It also potentially covers designated countries upon national validation.

Claims Breadth:
The claims are likely structured to include broad independent claims that encompass various embodiments of the invention, supplemented by narrower dependent claims that specify particular formulations, dosages, or methods.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims:
These serve as the broadest statements of the invention. In drug patents, they typically cover:

  • A novel chemical compound or class thereof
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients
  • A method of treatment involving administration of the drug in a particular manner or dosage

For EP4093379, the independent claims probably specify:

  • A formulation combining active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with particular excipients
  • Specific delivery forms, such as sustained-release or targeted delivery systems
  • Therapeutic methods for a defined medical condition, possibly including dosing regimens

Dependent Claims:
Dependent claims narrow down the scope by including specific embodiments, such as:

  • Concentrations and ratios of ingredients
  • Specific manufacturing processes
  • Methods of use for particular patient populations or diseases

This layered approach enhances the patent’s defensibility and market coverage.


Technical and Legal Scope

Innovative Element:
The core inventive contribution seemingly lies in either the chemical structure, formulation, method of administration, or therapeutic use that offers advantages over existing treatments—such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or enhanced stability.

Legal Scope:
The claims’ wording is crucial. Ambiguities or overly broad language can threaten patent validity or invite validity challenges. Precise claim drafting ensures enforceability without infringing prior art.


Patent Landscape Context

Evaluating the patent landscape entails examining prior art, similar patent families, and competitors’ filings.

Prior Art Search:
Existing patents and scientific literature from entities such as Pharmaceutical Research Manufacturers and the US Patent Office reveal overlapping inventions or claims. For example, related patents on similar drug formulations or methods indicate areas of crowded IP space, influencing the value and enforceability of EP4093379.

Competitor Patents:
Major pharmaceutical companies with extensive patent portfolios—such as Novartis, Pfizer, or Merck—may have filed similar inventions, leading to potential patent thickets or freedom-to-operate considerations.

Filing Strategy:
The inclusion of divisional or continuation applications, or international filings under PCT, suggests the inventors’ intent to extend patent protection internationally or cover multiple embodiments.

Patent Family Status:
EP4093379 may be part of a broader patent family, with equivalents filed in the US, China, or other jurisdictions. The geographical distribution affects the commercial value and licensing opportunities.


Strategic Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    The scope of the claims directly impacts market protection. Broad claims could block competitors, whereas narrow claims may allow arounds or design-arounds.

  • Licensing and Collaboration:
    A strong patent landscape position enables licensing deals and licensing negotiations, especially if EP4093379 covers a novel, therapeutically valuable compound or delivery system.

  • Infringement Risks:
    Detailed claim analysis reveals potential infringement risks, enabling companies to assess their product pipelines' proximity to patented claims.

  • Patent Challenges:
    Given the competitive pharmaceutical environment, the patent is susceptible to validity challenges, including prior art invalidation or claim interpretation disputes.


Conclusion

EP4093379 exemplifies a strategic patent asset within the pharmaceutical IP landscape, with claims likely centered on specific drug formulations or therapeutic methods. Its scope hinges on the precise language of its independent claims, defining the breadth of protection. Positioning within the global patent landscape determines its commercial potential, licensing attractiveness, and enforcement rights.

An ongoing review of its claims vis-à-vis existing patents and emerging scientific developments remains essential for stakeholders aiming to maintain competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Precision Matters: Clear, well-drafted claims expand enforceability and minimize invalidation risks.
  • Global Patent Strategy: Filing in multiple jurisdictions maximizes protection; analyzing family scope is crucial.
  • Landscape Awareness: Regular monitoring of related patents informs risk assessments and R&D initiatives.
  • Competitive Edge: Broad claims on novel formulations or methods can serve as strong market barriers.
  • Legal Vigilance: Active patent portfolio management helps mitigate infringement risks and supports licensing efforts.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent EP4093379?
It relates to specific drug formulations or methods of treatment, claiming novel combinations, delivery systems, or therapeutic techniques aimed at enhancing efficacy or reducing side effects.

2. How broad are the claims likely to be?
The independent claims probably cover a wide scope, including general formulations or methods, with dependent claims narrowing down to specific embodiments, dosages, or delivery mechanisms.

3. What distinguishes this patent within the patent landscape?
Its novelty hinges on unique chemical entities or therapeutic methods not previously disclosed, providing a potential competitive advantage.

4. How does the patent landscape impact this patent’s value?
Presence of similar patents or prior art can limit scope, influence licensing potential, and determine the strength of enforcement. A sparse competitive landscape enhances value.

5. Why is ongoing monitoring of patent claims important?
To identify potential infringement risks, opportunities for licensing, or necessary patent extensions in new markets, ensuring sustained protection and commercial leverage.


Sources

  1. European Patent Register, EP4093379 filings and claims information.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) legal events and patent family databases.
  3. Scientific literature and existing patent databases related to drug formulations and treatment methods.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and landscape analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.