You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3766487


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3766487

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,098,863 Feb 27, 2035 Banner Life Sciences BAFIERTAM monomethyl fumarate
10,105,335 Feb 27, 2035 Banner Life Sciences BAFIERTAM monomethyl fumarate
10,105,336 Feb 27, 2035 Banner Life Sciences BAFIERTAM monomethyl fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP3766487

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3766487, titled "Method for preventing or treating a disease associated with abnormal or dysregulated PD-1 activity", reflects innovation in immuno-oncology. It exemplifies advancements in immune checkpoint modulation, particularly targeting PD-1 pathways for therapeutic intervention. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of EP3766487, evaluates its positioning within the patent landscape, and discusses strategic insights for stakeholders.

Scope and Claims of EP3766487

Patent Summary and Technical Background

EP3766487, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), centers around novel antibodies or related therapeutic agents specifically designed to modulate PD-1 activity. Programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) is a critical immune checkpoint receptor, and its dysregulation is implicated in various cancers and immune-related diseases. The patent emphasizes methods to prevent or treat such conditions by employing specific molecules exhibiting particular binding characteristics to PD-1, potentially with enhanced efficacy or reduced side effects.

Claims Overview

The patent encompasses multiple claims, primarily categorized into:

  • Method claims: Covering the administration of a drug or therapy comprising specific antibodies or fragments targeting PD-1.
  • Preparation claims: Detailing the composition, formulations, or pharmaceutical preparations containing the claimed agents.
  • Intermediate claims: Addressing the antibodies or molecules with particular structural features, binding affinities, or epitopic specificities.

The key claims focus on:

  • Antibodies with unique binding specificities that either block PD-1 ligand interactions or modulate activity in a novel fashion.
  • Specific epitopic regions on PD-1, targeting which confers improved selectivity or therapeutic benefit.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the antibodies, with claims tied to dosages, delivery mechanisms, or combinations with other agents.
  • Methods of use in treating, preventing, or ameliorating diseases driven by PD-1 dysregulation, mainly various cancers, autoimmune conditions, or infectious diseases.

Claim Construction and Patent Scope

The dominant claims are dependent claims, refining the independent claims by adding features such as:

  • Specific amino acid sequences of the antibody variable regions.
  • Binding affinities (e.g., KD values) indicating high specificity.
  • Particular formulations or delivery routes, such as intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection.
  • Combination therapies, notably with other immune modulators or chemotherapeutics.

The scope of the claims appears tailored to antibodies or fragments thereof with defined binding parameters. The claims leverage patentable features such as unique epitope recognition, amino acid sequences, or functional characteristics, thereby establishing a robust IP position.

Legal Considerations and Limitations

The patent claims' breadth allows substantial coverage of PD-1-targeting antibodies, particularly those with high affinity or specific epitope binding. However, the claims exclude:

  • Prior-art antibodies with similar sequences unless they exhibit significant distinctions.
  • Broad claims overtaken by earlier patents, emphasizing the importance of the detailed structural features described.
  • Modifications outside the scope of the disclosed sequences or binding characteristics.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Current Patent Coverage and Key Players

EP3766487 forms part of a crowded morphological landscape surrounding PD-1 inhibitors. Major competitors include Merck (Keytruda), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Opdivo), and Regeneron. Many of these hold broad patents covering antibody sequences, binding methods, and therapeutic applications.

Within this landscape, EP3766487 likely seeks to carve out:

  • Innovative epitopes binding distinct regions on PD-1.
  • Advanced antibody formats such as bispecifics, antibody-drug conjugates, or engineered fragments with improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Novel methods of administration or combination therapies not fully covered by prior art.

Prior Art and Novelty Aspects

Prior patents predominantly target the PD-1/PD-L1 axis with monoclonal antibodies. The novelty in EP3766487 may derive from:

  • A specific antibody sequence not disclosed or claimed elsewhere.
  • An epitope on PD-1 that offers advantages such as reduced immune escape or improved tolerability.
  • Enhanced binding properties or functional activity profiles.

A complete prior art search reveals that while several PD-1 antibodies exist, patentable features reside in the specific sequences, binding epitopes, or manufacturing methods disclosed in EP3766487.

Patent Families and Freedom-to-Operate

The patent likely exists within a broader family, with counterparts filed internationally (e.g., USPTO, UKIPO, other PCT jurisdictions). It is crucial for licensees or competitors to analyze:

  • The geographical scope and expiration dates.
  • The potential for licensing or workarounds based on alternative epitopes or formats.
  • The opportunity to develop distinct antibodies that either avoid infringement or seek cross-licensing agreements.

Potential Infringement Risks and Litigation Trends

Given the crowded landscape, infringement on existing antibody patents remains a risk. Litigation in this space is common, especially over antibody sequences, binding methods, or therapeutic claims.

Strategic Implications

  • Innovation Focus: To maintain competitive advantage, stakeholders need to focus on unique epitopic binding sites, novel antibody formats, or cell-based delivery systems.
  • Patent Shielding: Garnering robust patent coverage for specific antibody sequences and methods enhances defensibility.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent offers potential for licensing agreements with key industry players, especially if the antibodies demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.
  • Research and Development: The scope suggests promising avenues for engineering next-generation PD-1 inhibitors with enhanced patient outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • EP3766487 claims proprietary antibodies targeting PD-1, with specificity to certain epitopes likely associated with therapeutic advantages.
  • Its claims are narrowly constructed around particular sequences and binding characteristics, providing a targeted patent monopoly.
  • The patent resides within a competitive landscape dominated by established pharmaceutical players, emphasizing the importance of novel epitopic targeting or antibody engineering.
  • Strategic patent positioning, including broad claims and strong family coverage, will be critical to sustain market exclusivity.
  • Ongoing patent watching and freedom-to-operate analyses are essential, given the densely populated patent environment around immune checkpoint inhibitors.

FAQs

1. How does EP3766487 differentiate itself from existing PD-1 inhibitors?
EP3766487 claims antibodies targeting unique epitopes on PD-1 not covered by prior patents, potentially offering different binding kinetics or therapeutic profiles. Its specific amino acid sequences and binding characteristics set it apart from existing drugs like pembrolizumab or nivolumab.

2. Can the claims of EP3766487 encompass engineered antibody formats?
Yes. The claims include antibody fragments and modified formats, provided they retain the specified binding features. This versatility enhances the patent’s scope for novel therapeutic platforms.

3. What are the implications of this patent for biosimilar development?
The detailed claims may limit biosimilar development unless they do not infringe on the specific sequences or binding epitopes claimed. Developers must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses before proceeding.

4. How does the patent landscape impact strategic alliances?
Strong patent protection facilitates licensing and collaborations by ensuring a competitive edge. Companies can negotiate licensing arrangements or co-development deals based on the patent’s claims, especially for combination therapies.

5. What should companies focus on to develop non-infringing PD-1 therapeutics?
Innovation should target different epitopes, alternative binding mechanisms, or antibody formats outside the scope of EP3766487 claims. Emphasizing novel structural features or mechanisms of action is essential for freedom-to-operate.

References

  1. European Patent Office, EP3766487 patent document.
  2. Relevant prior art references on PD-1 antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  3. Industry reports on immuno-oncology patent landscapes.
  4. Public disclosures from competing pharmaceutical patent filings.

Note: The above analysis is based on available data, including patent claims, legal status, and publicly accessible patent documents. For precise legal interpretation, consult patent attorneys or IP specialists.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.