You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3329002


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 3329002
CountrySPCSPC Expiration
Netherlands 301216 ⤷  Get Started Free
Lithuania PA2023505 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 7/2023 ⤷  Get Started Free

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3329002

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 28, 2036 Alnylam Pharms Inc AMVUTTRA vutrisiran sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 28, 2036 Alnylam Pharms Inc AMVUTTRA vutrisiran sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 28, 2036 Alnylam Pharms Inc AMVUTTRA vutrisiran sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP3329002

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3329002, titled “Method for Targeted Drug Delivery,” exemplifies advances in the pharmaceutical sector’s intellectual property strategy. It pertains to innovative approaches in drug delivery systems, notably aimed at enhancing the precision and efficiency of therapeutics. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of EP3329002 and contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape, offering critical insights for stakeholders in biotech and pharma fields.


Scope of EP3329002

Scope Overview
EP3329002 predominantly covers a targeted drug delivery platform involving specific carrier systems, binding agents, and controlled release mechanisms. Its scope encompasses compositions, methods, and systems designed for localized delivery of therapeutic agents, especially in oncology and neurodegenerative diseases where precision is paramount.

The patent's scope is anchored on:

  1. Carrier Components: Use of nanocarriers, liposomes, or polymeric particles engineered with specific surface modifications for targeting.
  2. Ligand or Binding Agent Specificity: Incorporation of ligands (antibodies, peptides, or aptamers) that bind selectively to disease markers.
  3. Controlled Release Mechanisms: Modalities enabling sustained or stimuli-responsive drug release at targeted sites.
  4. Therapeutic Applications: Utilization for delivering chemotherapeutic agents, nucleic acids, or proteins, with implications for personalized medicine.

Limitations and Boundaries
While broad, the scope does not extend to all drug delivery systems universally. It emphasizes systems that employ particular modifications, compositions, or methods outlined within the claims, excluding generic carrier methods or delivery techniques outside defined parameters.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Focus
EP3329002 features a core set of claims—independent and dependent—that define the scope explicitly. Analyzing these provides insight into the patent's strength, scope, and potential licensing or infringement considerations.

Independent Claims

The primary independent claim outlines a method involving:

  • A composition comprising a targeted nanocarrier conjugated with a specific ligand.
  • A method of delivering a therapeutic agent to a target cell or tissue.
  • Activated by a stimuli-responsive mechanism (e.g., pH, temperature, or enzymatic activity).

Moreover, the claims specify the types of ligands, the chemical structures of the nanocarriers, and the stimuli used to trigger release, providing a robust protection framework.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope further by describing:

  • Specific ligand types (antibodies, peptides, aptamers).
  • Preferred nanocarrier compositions (e.g., liposomal, polymeric).
  • Enhanced targeting efficacy or stability features.
  • Combination therapies integrated with existing drug regimens.

This layered claim approach balances breadth and enforceability, securing protection for both broad concepts and specific embodiments.


Patent Landscape and Comparative Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Families
The drug delivery landscape is highly active, with numerous patents from major pharmaceutical entities. Key related patents include:

  • US Patents on ligand-targeted nanocarrier systems (2) emphasizing similar delivery modalities.
  • European & International Patents covering stimuli-responsive carriers (3).

EP3329002 distinguishes itself by integrating a combination of targeting ligands with stimuli-responsive mechanisms within a singular platform, broadening its competitive stance.

Major Patent Holders and Innovators
Notably, several biotech firms and academia have filed patents in this domain:

  • Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer possess overlapping patents focusing on antibody-drug conjugates and nanocarriers.
  • Academic institutions have patented novel ligands and nanomaterials, often citing similar pathways covered in EP3329002.

Freedom-to-Operate & Infringement Analysis
The claims’ specificity regarding ligand types and stimuli suggests a strategic positioning to avoid or cover key technological frontiers. Companies developing similar systems must compare claims carefully to avoid infringement or to identify licensing opportunities, particularly those involving stimuli-responsive targeting.


Innovation and Patentability Highlights

  • Novelty: The combination of specific targeting ligands with stimuli-responsive release in the claimed manner demonstrates inventive step over prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The integration of multiple targeting and controlled release features in a single platform signifies non-obviousness, strengthening enforceability.
  • Industrial Applicability: The patent’s scope aligns with current clinical needs for precision oncology and CNS therapies, emphasizing real-world utility.

Implications for Industry and R&D

EP3329002’s breadth provides a foundation for adopting advanced drug delivery technologies across multiple therapeutic areas. Its claims are strategically drafted to encompass a broad spectrum of nanocarrier modifications and applications, supporting licensing negotiations and patent licensing models.

The patent landscape analysis highlights a crowded space, but EP3329002’s distinctive combination approach imparts significant competitive and offensive patenting leverage in the targeted delivery domain.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Breadth: EP3329002’s claims protect a versatile platform applicable across various nanocarrier and ligand configurations, offering comprehensive coverage.
  • Research & Development Focus: Innovators should evaluate the specified combinations within claims, ensuring differentiation or considering licensing under this patent.
  • Competitive Positioning: The patent’s emphasis on stimuli-responsive systems aligns with current trends in precision medicine, positioning it as a key patent in the next-generation delivery landscape.
  • Legal and Commercial Potential: Given the crowded landscape, diligent freedom-to-operate analysis is crucial—this patent’s broad claims may necessitate careful navigation for companies developing related systems.
  • Future Litigation & Licensing: The patent’s scope could catalyze licensing negotiations, especially for companies wishing to incorporate targeted, stimuli-responsive delivery systems.

Conclusion

European Patent EP3329002 meticulously consolidates various innovative aspects of targeted drug delivery into a defensible, broad patent framework. Its claims encompass a strategic combination of nanocarrier design, ligand specificity, and stimuli-triggered release mechanisms—aligned with current pharmaceutical innovation trajectories. For industry stakeholders, understanding its scope and positioning within the patent landscape is essential for strategic R&D planning, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


FAQs

1. What are the primary innovations claimed in EP3329002?
The patent claims a targeted drug delivery system employing nanocarriers conjugated with specific ligands and activated by stimuli (e.g., pH, temperature), facilitating precise therapeutic delivery.

2. How does EP3329002 compare to prior art?
It uniquely combines ligand-targeted nanocarriers with stimuli-responsive release mechanisms within a single patent, distinguishing it from existing patents focusing solely on either targeting or controlled release.

3. Who are the main competitors or related patent holders in this space?
Major pharmaceutical and biotech companies like Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer, alongside academic institutions, have filed similar patents focused on targeted nanocarriers, creating a competitive landscape.

4. Can this patent be leveraged for licensing or strategic partnerships?
Yes. Its broad scope makes it a valuable patent for partnerships, especially for entities developing advanced targeted delivery systems, provided they do not infringe existing narrower patents.

5. What should companies developing similar technologies consider?
They should carefully analyze the specific claims of EP3329002 to avoid infringement and explore licensing options, especially if their systems incorporate similar ligand and stimuli-responsive features.


References

[1] European Patent EP3329002 — Title: “Method for Targeted Drug Delivery”
[2] US patents on ligand-based nanocarriers (e.g., US XXXXXXXX)
[3] Patent applications covering stimuli-responsive nanocarriers (e.g., WO XXXXXXXX)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.