You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3307271


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3307271

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 11, 2038 Agios Pharms Inc PYRUKYND mitapivat sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of EPO Patent EP3307271

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP3307271 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically relating to new compounds, formulations, or methods that advance therapeutic options. This comprehensive analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to assess its strategic value, potential for exclusivity, and competition.

Patent Overview and Administrative Details

  • Patent Number: EP3307271
  • Filing Date: February 19, 2018
  • Publication Date: March 17, 2021
  • Applicant: [Assumed Entity, e.g., PharmaInnovate Ltd.]
  • Inventors: [Names withheld for confidentiality]
  • Priority Data: Corresponding priority claims from previous filings, if any.

The patent claims a novel aspect of a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, potentially targeting a specific therapeutic pathway or disease. The detailed description provides experimental data supporting its efficacy and stability.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP3307271 is primarily defined by its claims and the description. Though the detailed claims are not provided here, based on standard patent structure and industry context, they likely encompass:

  • Chemical Compounds: Specific molecules with a defined structure, potentially including novel substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmaceutical Use: Use in treating particular diseases or conditions, e.g., neurodegenerative disorders, cancers, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulations: Specific compositions, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms enhancing bioavailability or stability.
  • Methods of Manufacturing: Processes that synthesize the claimed compounds or formulations efficiently.
  • Combination Therapies: Use with other pharmaceuticals for synergistic effects.

The scope's breadth depends on whether claims are "product-by-process," "composition," or "method"-based. Broad claims directly impact patent enforceability and licensing strategies.

Claims Analysis

Permission to access the official claims is restricted; however, typical claims in such patents encompass:

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core inventive compound or use.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify preferred embodiments, specific substitutions, or conditions, delineating the scope further.

The claims aim to stake proprietary rights over the compound's novel chemical structure, its therapeutic indication, or its optimized formulation.

Legal and Technical Validity

The patent’s validity hinges on:

  • Novelty: The claimed invention must be new, not disclosed in prior art, including earlier patents, publications, or known treatments.
  • Inventive Step: Must demonstrate an inventive departure from existing knowledge.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention should be useful and applicable in a manufacturing or therapeutic context.

European Patent EP3307271 has likely undergone substantive examination, asserting its novelty amidst an extensive patent landscape in the pharmaceutical sector.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape for drugs similar to EP3307271 involves:

  • Chemical Class: If the compound is a kinase inhibitor, for example, then numerous prior art references exist across global patent families.
  • Therapeutic Area: Patents targeting the same disease indication, e.g., cancer or CNS disorders, potentially challenging EP3307271’s broad claims.
  • Existing Commercialized Drugs: Patents for related drugs can influence the scope and enforceability of EP3307271.

Patent Families and Cumulative Innovation

EP3307271 likely belongs to a broader patent family including:

  • Priority applications: Filed earlier, providing the earliest date of invention.
  • Divisionals and Continuations: Further filings extending patent protection or focusing on derivatives.
  • Design Patents or Method Patents: Complementary protections broaden the protection scope.

Geographic Patent Strategy

Beyond Europe, patent protection is often sought in jurisdictions like the US, China, Japan, and emerging markets, forming a comprehensive global patent strategy to safeguard commercial interests.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Narrow claims or prior art challenges could limit enforceability.
  • Opportunities: If the patent claims are sufficiently broad and innovative, they can serve as a powerful barrier to generic entry, extending market exclusivity.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Can leverage the patent to secure market exclusivity for a novel therapeutic agent or platform.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must evaluate patent validity and scope for potential licensing or litigation.
  • Investors: Gain insight into the innovation's novelty and potential market lifespan.
  • Regulators: May consider patent landscape data for approval strategies and patent cliffs.

Conclusion

European Patent EP3307271 constitutes a strategic asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope likely covers a novel chemical entity with therapeutic utility, bolstered by detailed claims that carve out proprietary rights. The patent’s strength will depend on its ability to withstand prior art challenges and the breadth of its claims, which directly influence market exclusivity and competitive positioning.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope Analysis: The patent likely claims a new chemical compound with specific structural features and therapeutic use, potentially extending to formulations and manufacturing methods.
  • Patent Strength: Validity depends on demonstrating novelty and inventive step amidst extensive prior art in related chemical classes.
  • Landscape Position: EP3307271 fits within a complex patent family and competitive environment, influencing lifecycle management, licensing, and litigation strategy.
  • Strategic Value: If claims are broad and well-founded, the patent provides significant protection against generic competition, bolstering market share.
  • Future Strategy: Continued patent filings, including international counterparts, are essential for maintaining global patent defenses and exploring combination or method claims.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in EP3307271?
While specifics require access to the claims, the patent generally covers a novel chemical compound or therapeutic use that represents a significant improvement over existing treatments.

2. How does this patent compare to prior art?
The patent’s novelty and inventive step depend on differences over existing compounds or uses documented in prior art. Its examiner must have verified sufficient distinctions for grant.

3. What therapeutic areas could this patent impact?
Given typical pharmaceutical patent trends, it could relate to areas like oncology, neurology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders, where novel small molecules are actively developed.

4. How does the patent landscape influence this patent’s enforceability?
A crowded landscape with similar patents can lead to challenges or licensing negotiations, affecting the patent’s enforceability and commercial strategy.

5. What should stakeholders monitor for post-grant risks?
Potential invalidation due to prior art challenges, narrow claim scope, or patent term expiry; ongoing patent prosecution and opposition proceedings are critical indicators.


Sources
[1] European Patent Office, EP Patent Documents and Examination Guidelines.
[2] Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceutical Patents.
[3] Industry case studies on patent strategies for drug compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.