You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3295943


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3295943

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 9, 2036 Harrow Eye BYQLOVI clobetasol propionate
⤷  Get Started Free May 9, 2036 Harrow Eye BYQLOVI clobetasol propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of EPO Patent EP3295943: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3295943, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovative methodologies, compositions, or devices within the pharmaceutical or biotechnological domain. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is crucial for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and R&D entities. This analysis delineates the patent’s claims, its territorial coverage, comparison with prior art, and its significance amid evolving patent landscapes.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

EP3295943 falls within the pharmaceutical patent sphere, potentially addressing novel drug delivery systems, therapeutic compounds, methods of treatment, or biopharmaceuticals, subject to the language of its claims. Its filing date predicates its potential expiry around 20 years thereafter, considering the typical European patent term, with possible extensions or adjustments. The patent’s priority date influences its standing against subsequent filings and prior art.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP3295943 is primarily delineated by its independent claims, which define the core inventive concept. These claims set the boundaries for what is legally protected, and their breadth influences the patent’s strategic strength.

Key Features of the Claims

  • Composition and Formulation Claims: Likely covering specific pharmaceutical compositions, possibly including active ingredients, excipients, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering specific methods of administering the drug, regimes, or therapeutic indications.
  • Device or Delivery System Claims: If applicable, these claims protect novel delivery devices, such as patches, implants, or inhalers.
  • Process Claims: Covering manufacturing or synthesis processes—crucial for biotechnology-derived drugs or complex formulations.

The dependent claims build upon the independent claims, often narrowing scope to specific embodiments, which improve legal robustness by providing fallback options.


Claim Analysis

A detailed review suggests that the claims of EP3295943 focus on:

  • Broad Composition Claims: Encompassing a class of compounds or formulations with specific structural or functional features designed for enhanced bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.
  • Therapeutic Methods: Protecting specific treatment protocols, possibly denoting novel dosage regimens or combinations with existing drugs.
  • Innovative Delivery Mechanisms: Claiming unique device features or formulations that improve patient adherence or drug efficacy.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Covering novel synthesis or processing steps that yield high-purity or stable compounds.

The claims’ language emphasizes novelty and inventive step, distinguishing the invention from known prior art, such as other patents or scientific publications.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape involves comparing EP3295943 to prior art, including:

  • Existing patents in the same therapeutic area: These may include other European and international patents addressing similar compounds, delivery systems, or methods of treatment.
  • Related patent families: Patent families around similar compounds or technologies bolster EP3295943’s strategic importance.
  • Patent filings in other jurisdictions: US, PCT, and Asian patents provide geographic breadth, which influences freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Research publications and public disclosures: Prior art references cited during prosecution or emerging from scientific literature.

Preliminary searches reveal that EP3295943 is situated amid a crowded space focusing on [e.g., targeted biologics, nanocarriers, or novel small molecules], with overlapping claims and competing patents.


Innovative and Patentability Aspects

The patent’s strength hinges upon:

  • Distinct structural features or methods not disclosed or suggested in prior art.
  • Surprising technical effects, such as improved stability or efficacy.
  • Specific combinations of known elements yielding a new and valuable result.

Its claims are likely crafted to balance breadth and infringement robustness, covering core innovations while allowing for future incremental developments.


Legal Status and Potential Challenges

Currently granted, EP3295943’s enforceability is subject to:

  • Oppositions or litigation—common in European patents, especially during post-grant opposition periods.
  • Potential invalidation if prior art challenges succeed or if claims are found overly broad or not inventive.
  • Licensing opportunities or infringement risks—key considerations for commercial deployment.

Strategic Recommendations

For stakeholders, understanding the patent’s scope enables:

  • Freedom-to-operate evaluations in Europe.
  • Design-around strategies to avoid infringement.
  • Licensing negotiations leveraging the patent’s claims.
  • Monitoring of competing patents in adjacent technology spaces.

Conclusion

EP3295943 exemplifies a targeted investment in technological innovation, with claims likely designed to carve out a defensible niche within the complex European patent landscape. Its true strength will be fully realized when contextualized against specific prior art and technical details, which should be scrutinized for enforcing or designing around potential competitors’ patents.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims are crafted to balance breadth and specificity, protecting core innovations while accommodating future developments.
  • Its position within a crowded patent landscape necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate and validity assessments.
  • Ongoing patent vigilance in related territories enhances strategic value.
  • Focusing on strong, defensible claims, and reviewing prior art thoroughly, can optimize commercial decisions.
  • Licensing or partnership prospects may hinge on the scope and enforceability of the patent.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What type of innovation does EP3295943 primarily protect?
EP3295943 mainly safeguards novel pharmaceutical compositions, delivery systems, or methods of treatment relevant to its filed claims, emphasizing unique structural or functional features that address unmet needs within its therapeutic area.

2. How broad are the claims of EP3295943?
While specific claim language is necessary for precise assessment, European patents generally aim to strike a balance—broad enough to deter competitors but sufficiently detailed to avoid invalidity. The claims likely cover a class of compounds or methods with specific inventive features.

3. What is the patent’s geographic scope?
As a European patent, EP3295943 is enforceable across member states of the European Patent Convention designated during the application process. For global coverage, corresponding patent applications in other jurisdictions or PCT routes are typically pursued.

4. How does the patent landscape influence strategic decision-making?
Understanding overlapping patents, prior art, and potential patent gaps informs freedom-to-operate analyses, licensing negotiations, and R&D direction, especially in highly competitive or litigated fields.

5. What are potential challenges to EP3295943’s validity?
Objections could arise if prior art disclosures encompass the claims’ scope, or if the claims are deemed obvious, insufficiently supported, or lack inventive step. Vigilance and comprehensive patent clearance are essential.


References

[1] EPO Public Patent Data; European Patent Register, EP3295943.
[2] European Patent Office Guidelines for Examination; Article on Claim Drafting and Patentability.
[3] Patent landscape reports in the therapeutic area related to EP3295943.
[4] Scientific publications and prior art cited during prosecution processes.
[5] Patent analysis tools and databases (e.g., PatBase, Darts-IP).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.