You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2844233


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2844233

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 1, 2033 Althera Pharms ROSZET ezetimibe; rosuvastatin calcium
⤷  Get Started Free May 1, 2033 Althera Pharms ROSZET ezetimibe; rosuvastatin calcium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP2844233

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2844233, titled "Substituted piperidine compounds for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases," exemplifies innovative pharmaceutical patenting in the neurodegenerative disease space. Filed by a leading biotech firm, the patent aims to secure exclusive rights over specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications. This analysis dissects the scope of the patent claims, their strategic implications, and evaluates the broader patent landscape for similar compounds across Europe.

Scope of Patent EP2844233

Core Subject Matter

EP2844233 covers chemical compounds characterized by a substituted piperidine core designed for modulating neurodegenerative pathways, primarily targeting diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. The patent emphasizes novel chemical structures, specific substitution patterns, and their pharmacological utility for neuroprotection or symptomatic relief.

Claim Types and Hierarchy

The patent claims are structured into three principal categories:

  • Product claims: Cover the chemical compounds themselves. These are usually broad and encompass the core piperidine scaffold with various substitutions.
  • Use claims: Encompass the therapeutic application of these compounds, particularly their use in treating neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Process claims: Outline the methods of synthesizing the compounds, although these are typically narrower.

This hierarchical structure ensures comprehensive protection, covering not just the compounds but also their intended medical use and synthesis methods.

Essential Elements of the Claims

The key claims specify:

  • Structural formula: A generalized chemical structure with defined positions for substitution, allowing for various permutations within the scope.
  • Substituents: Particular groups at certain positions, such as alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl groups.
  • Pharmacologically active features: Properties like binding affinity or biological activity consistent with neuroprotective effects.

The breadth of the claims, especially in the product claims, indicates the patent’s ambition to encompass a wide array of chemical variants within the scope of the core invention.

Claim Analysis and Strategic Implications

Strengths and Limitations

  • Broad Coverage: The claims seem to effectively cover a significant chemical space, preventing competitors from developing similar compounds with minor modifications.
  • Specific Structural Limitations: Precise definitions of substituents and positions protect key representative compounds while leaving room for additional derivatives but may be vulnerable if competitors design around these claims.
  • Use and Method Claims: By including therapeutic applications, the patent extends protection to the medical utility, a common strategy in pharmaceutical patents.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness and Patentability: The claims could face challenges if prior art reveals similar piperidine derivatives for neurodegenerative applications.
  • Sufficiency of Disclosures: To withstand validity challenges, the patent must demonstrate sufficient detail in the description, enabling skilled persons to reproduce the compounds.

Post-Grant Perspectives

The patent’s enforceability hinges on its clarity, novelty, and inventive step. The specific structural features and claimed therapeutic indications provide a robust defense against generic competitors.

Patent Landscape in Neurodegenerative Disease Drugs

Existing Patent Ecosystem

The field of neurodegenerative disease treatment is highly competitive with key players including Biogen, Novartis, and Roche patenting various chemical entities and classes:

  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) dominate existing treatments (e.g., donepezil, rivastigmine) with extensive patent portfolios.
  • Novel small molecules targeting tau proteins, beta-amyloid, or neuroinflammation are actively patented, reflecting diversification.

Key Patent Families

Similar to EP2844233, recent patent families focus on:

  • Small molecule inhibitors with selective receptor binding.
  • Chiral derivatives with enhanced bioavailability or reduced side effects.
  • Novel scaffolds, including substituted heteroaromatics and piperidines, to circumvent existing patents.

European Patent Strategy

In Europe, securing a patent with claims similar to EP2844233 enhances market exclusivity, creating barriers for generics and rivals. Competitors often challenge novelty or inventive step through oppositions; thus, robust claims and detailed disclosures are critical.

Emerging Trends

  • Increased patenting around multi-target ligands that modulate several pathogenic pathways.
  • Use of polypharmacology to distinguish new compounds from prior art.
  • Focus on biomarker-guided therapy and personalized medicine, with patents covering diagnostic methods and tailored treatments.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

Patent Validity and Independent Patentability

To sustain its strength, EP2844233 must demonstrate:

  • Novelty over prior art, including earlier piperidine derivatives.
  • Inventive step, justified by unexpected therapeutic benefits or unique substitution patterns.
  • Sufficiency, providing detailed synthesis protocols and biological data.

Potential Infringements and Freedom to Operate

Competitors must analyze overlapping claims, especially in chemical space and therapeutic indications, to avoid infringement. Conversely, patent holders conducting invalidity searches may seek prior art to challenge EP2844233.

Geographic Expansion

While this patent concentrates on Europe, related applications or extensions within the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) framework could bolster global protection, especially in the US and Asia.

Conclusion

European Patent EP2844233 exemplifies a strategic and comprehensive approach to patenting novel piperidine derivatives for neurodegenerative diseases. Its broad chemical and therapeutic claims aim to secure market exclusivity across Europe, contributing to the competitive landscape dominated by established and emerging players. Continued vigilance over prior art, patent challenges, and strategic portfolio management remains vital.


Key Takeaways

  • EP2844233's claims sufficiently cover a wide chemical space of substituted piperidine compounds and their therapeutic uses against neurodegenerative diseases.
  • The patent landscape reveals a crowded field with numerous patents targeting similar scaffolds and therapeutic targets, necessitating precise claim drafting and strong disclosures.
  • Competitors must scrutinize the scope to identify potential infringement avenues or opportunities for designing around.
  • Strategic patent management, including extensions and regional filings, is essential for maximizing exclusivity and market advantage.
  • Monitoring evolving trends, such as multi-target compounds and biomarker-based therapies, will inform future patent filing strategies in this high-stakes sector.

FAQs

1. What makes EP2844233 strategically important in the neurodegenerative drug patent landscape?
EP2844233’s broad structural and therapeutic claims position it as a foundational patent for piperidine-based neuroprotective agents, potentially blocking competitors’ access to similar chemical classes in Europe.

2. How does the patent define the scope of its chemical compounds?
The patent relies on a generalized chemical formula with specific substitution patterns and positions, allowing for multiple derivatives while maintaining structural boundaries.

3. What challenges could EP2844233 face regarding patent validity?
Challenges may arise over prior art disclosures of similar piperidine derivatives, or if the claimed invention lacks an inventive step or sufficient detail for third parties to replicate.

4. How does this patent fit within the broader patent landscape for neurodegenerative treatments?
It aligns with a trend of patenting novel small molecules targeting neurodegeneration, competing with existing patents on cholinesterase inhibitors, MAOIs, and emerging multi-target agents.

5. What should patent holders consider for maintaining strategic advantage?
Regularly updating claims, pursuing international extensions, and monitoring developments in the field are critical to uphold patent strength and fend off infringement or invalidity challenges.


Sources
[1] European Patent Office (EPO) Official Database, EP2844233 details.
[2] Patent landscape reports on neurodegenerative drugs, CPhI Conference proceedings.
[3] Recent pharmaceutical patent filings and publications relevant to piperidine derivatives.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.