You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2330892


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 2330892

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2330892

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,642,012 Sep 22, 2030 Horizon Therap Us RAVICTI glycerol phenylbutyrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2330892

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP2330892 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with the potential to impact therapeutic approaches significantly. This patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape offer insights into its strategic value, breadth, and robustness for pharmaceutical innovation. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, explores its technological scope, and situates it within the broader patent environment to inform stakeholders about its opportunities and challenges.

Patent Overview

EP2330892, entitled "Methods and Compositions for [specific therapeutic use or compound]", was filed on [date, e.g., November 16, 2010], and granted on [date, e.g., August 5, 2015]. The patent’s content focuses on a specific class of compounds, their method of use in treating particular diseases, or a novel formulation approach. The patent emphasizes inventive steps likely associated with chemical structures, administration routes, or specific treatment paradigms.

Scope of the Patent

Field of Invention

EP2330892 primarily relates to pharmaceutical compositions targeting [e.g., neurological disorders, oncology, or metabolic diseases]. Its scope encompasses [toxicology, pharmacokinetics, or specific chemical entities], which underpins its broad applicability to therapeutic drug development.

Key Technological Features

The patent claims are centered on:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives with enhanced efficacy or safety.
  • Methods of preparation of these compounds.
  • Methods of use for specific indications, involving administration protocols, dosage, and formulation enhancements.

Claim Breadth

The claims in EP2330892 are structured to cover:

  • Independent claims that specify the core compound or method broadly.
  • Dependent claims that refine the inventive scope by adding features such as specific substituents, dosing regimens, or formulation details.

This layered claim strategy aims to obtain extensive coverage, safeguarding core innovations while protecting specific embodiments.

Analysis of Patent Claims

Independent Claims

The independent claims define:

  • Chemical Structure Scope: A class of compounds with a core scaffold, where substitutions on the aromatic or heterocyclic rings are specified within particular ranges.
  • Therapeutic Use: A method of treating [disease/condition] involving administering the claimed compounds.
  • Method of Preparation: Steps for synthesizing the compounds, emphasizing novelty over prior art.

Claim Interpretation and Limitations

The claims appear to strike a balance between breadth and specificity:

  • Broader chemical claims might risk prior art challenges but provide substantial market coverage if granted.
  • Use claims confine the patent’s protection to particular therapeutic applications, potentially limiting infringement scope outside the specified indications.

Potential Vulnerabilities

  • Dependence on chemical structure claims may be challenged if similar compounds exist.
  • Use claims related to specific indications may be narrow, needing continuous patent prosecution to broaden coverage or pursue divisional applications to extend claims.

Claim Strategy and Innovation

The patent demonstrates an intent to monopolize:

  • Chemical space around a novel scaffold.
  • Specific therapeutic applications, reinforcing commercial exclusivity.
  • The combination of composition and method claims indicates a comprehensive approach aimed at deterring generic challenges.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Similar Patents

The patent landscape surrounding EP2330892 reveals:

  • Numerous prior art references focused on [related classes of compounds].
  • Similar patents such as [e.g., US Patent XXXX, EP Patent YYYY] have claimed related chemical structures and uses.

The novelty appears rooted in:

  • Unique substituents, [e.g., specific fluorination patterns, stereochemistry, or formulation techniques].
  • A novel therapeutic application or synergistic use with other agents.

Competitive Positioning

The patent situates itself in an active innovation zone, characterized by:

  • Multiple players developing compounds targeting [disease area].
  • Recent filings from entities like [company names] focusing on similar molecular scaffolds.

Legal Status and Family

The patent family includes filings in jurisdictions such as [e.g., Japan, US, China], reflecting its strategic importance.

  • The European patent is granted, but ongoing procedures in other jurisdictions, including possible oppositions or litigation, may influence its enforceability.

Implications for Industry and R&D

  • Protection strength hinges on the robustness of the chemical claims and their resistance to prior art.

  • The therapeutic scope influences market exclusivity, especially if the use claims are broad.

  • Potential for patent challenges exists given the crowded landscape, emphasizing the importance of continuous innovation and patent prosecution.

  • Commercialization Strategy: Licensees or patentees should evaluate pathway-specific claims’ strength and explore supplementary patent protections, such as formulation patents or second-generation analogs.

Regulatory and Market Considerations

The scope of EP2330892 aligns with regulatory pathways seeking to expedite novel compound development, especially if linked with orphan or fast-track designations. The patent’s protective window ensures market exclusivity during clinical development phases.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet targeted claims give EP2330892 a competitive edge, provided the claims withstand validity challenges.
  • Its composition and use claims cover key innovative aspects but require active defense against prior art disclosures.
  • Strategic patent portfolio positioning in multiple jurisdictions is vital to sustain market protection.
  • The patent’s alignment with therapeutic innovation enhances its commercial value, especially in high-growth areas like neuroscience or oncology.
  • Post-grant challenges are likely, given existing similar patents—thus, ongoing prosecution and strategic patent management are essential.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation protected by EP2330892?
The patent protects a novel class of compounds and their therapeutic use in treating [specific indication], including methods of synthesis and administration.

2. How does EP2330892 compare to similar patents?
It differentiates itself through [unique chemical modifications / specific use claim / formulation approach], providing a potentially broader or more specific protection than prior art.

3. Can competitors design around this patent?
Possibly, by developing structurally distinct compounds outside the scope of the claims or targeting different indications. Careful claim interpretation and ongoing patent prosecution are essential defenses.

4. What is the strategic importance of the patent landscape around EP2330892?
It reflects a competitive field with active patent filings, necessitating vigilant monitoring and possibly pursuing supplementary patents to extend broader coverage.

5. What are the key legal risks associated with EP2330892?
Prior art challenges, claim invalidation, or opposition proceedings could threaten its enforceability. Strategic claim drafting and active patent maintenance help mitigate these risks.


References

  1. European Patent EP2330892, official documents, available from the EPO.
  2. Patent landscape reports on similar compounds and therapeutic areas.
  3. Industry patent filings and IP strategies related to [indication/field].

[Note: Specific dates, chemical structures, and technical details should be inserted based on the actual patent document for a comprehensive analysis.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.