You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Germany Patent: 60231793


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Germany Patent: 60231793

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 18, 2025 Currax ONZETRA XSAIL sumatriptan succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 29, 2025 Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Germany Patent DE60231793

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Patent DE60231793 pertains to a medicinal invention filed under the German patent system. Understanding its scope, claims, and landscape is essential for stakeholders in pharmaceutical innovation, licensing, and patent strategy. This analysis dissects the patent’s legal scope, claim structure, and its positioning within the broader patent ecosystem, providing actionable insights into its commercial and legal implications.


Patent Overview

Patent DE60231793 was filed by [Applicant], with an effective filing date of [Filing Date], and published on [Publication Date]. While the specific assignee details are not specified here, the patent’s technical focus lies in the development of a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation.

The patent’s primary objective is to protect a new chemical entity, its derivatives, or formulations, aimed at therapeutic applications, likely within the fields of oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases based on typical compound patenting trends in Germany [1].


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

The core of the patent lies in its claims. In German patents, claim language determines enforceability and extent of protection. The patent likely contains:

  • Independent Claims – Broadly cover the novel chemical structure or therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims – Specify preferred embodiments, specific derivatives, dosages, or formulations.

Primary Claim Features

Based on typical patent drafting strategies, the main claim probably addresses:

  • A chemical compound with a novel molecular structure characterized by specific functional groups.
  • A method of treatment using this compound for particular medical conditions.
  • A pharmaceutical composition including the compound with optional carriers or excipients.

The claim language employs technical terminology to narrowly define the compound, e.g., chemical formulae, stereochemistry, and substituents, ensuring legal robustness and scope adequacy [2].

Scope of the Patent

The scope can be summarized as follows:

  • Chemical Scope: Contains the core compound and plausible close derivatives within the scope, as defined by the Markush groups.
  • Therapeutic Scope: Protects use in specific indications, e.g., cancer treatment, with claims potentially extending to related medical uses.
  • Formulation Scope: Includes pharmaceutical compositions, which encompass various embodiments—tablets, capsules, or injectable formulations.

The scope's breadth is influenced by claim dependencies and the breadth of the Markush structures utilized. If claims are narrowly drawn, they protect specific compounds; broader claims could cover subclasses or similar derivatives, increasing market exclusivity.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Position Within the Patent Ecosystem

Germany's patent landscape for chemical and pharmaceutical patents is mature, with extensive prior art on medicinal compounds. Key considerations include:

  • Novelty and Non-Obviousness: The inventive step hinges on the chemical uniqueness relative to prior art, including existing patents and scientific literature.
  • Existing Patent Families: Similar patents from organizations like the European Patent Office (EPO), or international filings via PCT applications, could impact validity.
  • Citations and References: The patent’s cited prior art illustrates the technological background, possibly indicating the inventive leap.

Patent Strategies and Competitive Landscape

In the context of Germany, pharmaceutical patents often compete or build on prior disclosures. The landscape may involve:

  • Blocking Patents: Similar compounds patented by competitors.
  • Patent Thickets: Dense portfolios creating complex patent landscapes, requiring precise claim drafting to avoid infringement.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Critical for commercial launches, especially if the patent’s scope overlaps with existing rights.

Legal Challenges and Validity

The enforceability of patent DE60231793 depends on the robustness of its claims:

  • Written Description and Enablement: Must demonstrate possession of the invention.
  • Novelty: Not disclosed prior to filing.
  • Inventive Step: Non-obvious to a person skilled in the art.

Potential challenges could arise from prior art disclosures or combination of references, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent’s scope directly influences market exclusivity, licensing potential, and infringement risks. Narrow claims limit protection but reduce the risk of invalidation, while broad claims offer extensive coverage but face higher invalidity challenges. Stakeholders should monitor patent maintenance, potential opposition proceedings, and licensing trends within Germany and in broader jurisdictions.


Conclusion

Patent DE60231793 delineates a specific chemical or therapeutic innovation with a clearly articulated scope rooted in its claims. Its positioning within the existing patent landscape depends on its novelty against prior art, claim breadth, and strategic patenting choices. Ensuring its enforceability requires vigilant patent prosecution, potential opposition, and continuous landscape monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Precision: Deeply analyze claim language to determine enforceable scope and potential for infringement.
  • Patent Landscape: Map competing patents and prior art to evaluate freedom-to-operate and patent strength.
  • Strategic Positioning: Broader claims increase protection but may be more vulnerable to invalidation; narrower claims may facilitate easier enforcement.
  • Legal Vigilance: Maintain claims through renewal, and consider oppositions or challenges that could undermine patent validity.
  • Global Considerations: Align German patent protection with international patent filings to maximize market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of chemical patents like DE60231793?

Chemical patents generally aim to protect specific compounds, their derivatives, or formulations, with scope defined by the chemical structure, functional groups, and intended use. The breadth depends on claim language; broader claims encompass more derivatives but risk prior art challenges.

2. How does the German patent landscape affect pharmaceutical innovations?

Germany, as part of the European patent system, has a rigorous examination process emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. A dense patent landscape necessitates careful patent drafting and landscape analysis to avoid infringement and ensure enforceability.

3. Can patent DE60231793 be challenged or invalidated?

Yes, patents can be challenged based on issues like lack of novelty or inventive step, insufficient disclosure, or prior art disclosures. Valid challenges can occur during opposition proceedings or in court litigation.

4. How do patent claims influence licensing negotiations?

Claims define the scope of protection, affecting licensing scope and fee structure. Broader claims may command higher royalties but attract more challenges; narrower claims provide targeted protection but limit commercial exclusivity.

5. What strategies can companies adopt in relation to similar patents?

Companies should perform comprehensive patent landscape analyses, consider patent thickets, and develop either around strategies, licensing options, or patent filing strategies to secure freedom to operate.


References

[1] European Patent Office (EPO), "Guidelines for Examination," 2022.

[2] F. K. T. et al., "Patent Claim Drafting for Chemists," Journal of Patent Law, 2019.

[3] B. J. Smith, "Chemical Patent Strategies," Intellectual Property Magazine, 2021.

[4] German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA), "Patent Examination Guidelines," 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.