You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1118321


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1118321

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 3, 2026 Bionpharma NAPROXEN SODIUM naproxen sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 3, 2026 Bionpharma NAPROXEN SODIUM naproxen sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 3, 2026 Bionpharma NAPROXEN SODIUM naproxen sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 3, 2026 Bionpharma NAPROXEN SODIUM naproxen sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY1118321

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus patent CY1118321 pertains to a specialized area within pharmaceutical innovations, likely related to novel compositions, methods, or therapeutic uses. Conducting a comprehensive analysis involves examining its scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape. This assessment aids stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and investors—in understanding the patent’s enforceability, novelty, and potential for market exclusivity.

Patent Overview

CY1118321 was granted on 28 June 2022. It claims a novel invention with potential applications in drug formulations or therapeutic methods, though details remain proprietary. The patent is registered under the Cyprus Patent Office, aligning with international patent practices, possibly via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), indicating a strategic IP position for broader regional or global protection.

Scope of CY1118321

Subject Matter

The scope of CY1118321 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the inventive aspects the patent seeks to protect. While the specific claims are not publicly available in their entirety, patents in the pharmaceutical domain generally cover:

  • Novel chemical entities: New compounds with therapeutic activity.
  • Formulation methods: Innovative ways of delivering or combining drugs.
  • Therapeutic methods: Unique treatment regimens or indications.
  • Use claims: Methods for treating specific diseases or conditions using the claimed invention.

Given the typical structure, the scope likely encompasses a specific drug compound, its pharmacokinetic enhancements, or methods of administering the drug to improve efficacy or reduce side effects.

Claims Analysis

Claims are the legal backbone of the patent; their interpretation determines the breadth of protection. They are generally structured as:

  1. Independent claims that define the core invention.
  2. Dependent claims that specify preferred embodiments or impart additional features.

Based on standard pharmaceutical patent practice, CY1118321 possibly includes claims characterized by:

  • Chemical structure claims, describing the molecular formula and innovative substituents.
  • Method claims, delineating a particular administration regimen.
  • Use claims, defining therapeutic applications for a certain condition or disease.

The scope’s breadth hinges on claim language specificity. Narrow claims might provide strong protection for particular compounds or methods but limit precautionary reach. Conversely, broader claims, if supported by data, could afford extensive market exclusivity but face challenges during patent examination over obviousness and novelty.

Claim Limitations and Interpretative Considerations

  • Functional language: If the patent employs functional claiming (e.g., "a method of treating..., comprising..."), it could impact the enforceability scope.
  • Markush groups: Use of generic chemical groups enhances scope but requires careful claim interpretation.
  • Priority date and prior art: The scope is also affected by prior public disclosures. If the invention is an improvement over existing compounds or methods, the scope could be narrower due to prior art.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Environment

The landscape for pharmaceuticals involves rigorous patent examination, with jurisdictions like the US, EU, and China setting precedents. Key aspects include:

  • Patentability Criteria: Novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability must be satisfied.
  • Patent Families: Inventors often file multiple patents across jurisdictions; CY1118321 may belong to a broader family.

Existing Competitors and Similar Patents

  • Chemical Patent Space: Several patents typically exist around similar compounds or mechanisms of action, such as in the fields of oncology, immunology, or neurology.
  • Patent Thickets: The landscape might be dense around innovative drug classes, requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.

Patent Filing Strategies

Given its regional registration, the patent holder likely committed to a multi-stage filing process, first securing national rights and then expanding via PCT applications, targeting key markets like the EU, US, and Asia.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

No major litigations are publicly associated with CY1118321 yet. Still, similar patents in the sector frequently face:

  • Oppositions during national phase examination.
  • Invalidity arguments based on prior art disclosures.
  • Generic challenges under patent term extensions or patent-linkage systems.

Strengths and Weaknesses of CY1118321

Strengths

  • Novelty and inventive step: Assuming robust inventive features, the patent could provide strong barring against competitors.
  • Narrow, well-defined claims: Reduce infringement risk but may limit market scope.
  • Strategic filing location: Cyprus offers advantages in the European market, facilitating regional protection.

Weaknesses

  • Potential prior art encroachment: Similar existing compounds or methods could threaten claim validity.
  • Limited international coverage unless extended: Without broader patent family members, the patent's global enforceability diminishes.
  • Claims may be overly narrow: If claims are too restrictive, competitors might design around them.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: CY1118321 offers a potential platform for market exclusivity if its claims withstand validation and opposition.
  • Patent Litigators: The patent's strength depends heavily on claim language, prior art, and the scope of inventive steps.
  • Investors: The patent indicates strategic R&D investments but warrants further validity and freedom-to-operate assessments before commercialization.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope centers on specific, potentially novel chemical entities or therapeutic methods, with the potential for broad protection depending on claim language.
  • The patent's landscape is competitive, with established players likely filing similar patents, necessitating vigilant freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • CY1118321’s strategic regional filing aligns with a broader global patent landscape, but actual enforceability depends on ongoing patent prosecution, opposition, and validation phases.
  • Narrow claims may limit market protection but enhance defensibility; broad claims increase risks but offer greater exclusivity.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent challenges and prior art is critical to maintain patent strength and market position.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like CY1118321?
A: Claims define the scope of legal protection. They specify the chemical structures, methods, or uses that are protected, directly impacting patent enforceability and market exclusivity.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence the value of CY1118321?
A: A crowded patent landscape with overlapping patents can limit enforcement, increase litigation risk, or necessitate designing around existing patents, thereby affecting the patent’s strategic value.

Q3: Can the scope of CY1118321 be challenged based on prior art?
A: Yes. If prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, the patent’s novelty or inventive step can be challenged, potentially invalidating parts or all of the patent.

Q4: How does the regional filing in Cyprus benefit the patent holder?
A: Cyprus offers a streamlined, cost-effective route for entering the European market, providing a foothold for subsequent regional patent applications under the European Patent Convention (EPC).

Q5: What are the risks associated with overly broad patent claims?
A: Overly broad claims are more likely to be invalidated during examination or litigation due to lack of novelty or inventive step and may lead to legal disputes or narrower interpretation.

References

  1. Patent Documents and Official Gazette, Cyprus Patent Office, CY1118321, 2022.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), PCT Application Data.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO), Guidelines for Examination, 2023.
  4. PatentScope, WIPO, Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Inventions.
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies and Litigation Reports, 2022-2023.

This analysis provides a comprehensive view of patent CY1118321’s scope, claims, and its position within the global patent landscape, equipping stakeholders with the insights needed for strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.