You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2637672


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2637672

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,016,403 Jan 25, 2027 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
8,486,972 Apr 27, 2030 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
8,835,460 Jan 25, 2027 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canadian Patent CA2637672

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Canadian patent CA2637672, granted to Boehringer Ingelheim in 2014, pertains to a novel therapeutic compound or formulation. This patent forms part of the company's extensive patent portfolio in the pharmaceutical domain, particularly concerning innovative treatments for various diseases. This analysis elucidates the patent's scope, claims, strategic positioning, and the broader landscape in which it operates, aiding stakeholders in assessing its strength, coverage, and potential implications for competitive positioning.


Patent Overview and Scope

Patent Title and Filing Context

Patent CA2637672 primarily covers a specific chemical entity, its pharmaceutical compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes. The patent originates from a filing in the early 2010s, likely aligned with the pharmaceutical company's strategic focus on developing novel therapeutics—possibly targeting conditions such as metabolic disorders, neurological conditions, or oncological indications, based on industry trends during that period.

Patent Term and Geographical Reach

Granted in 2014, the patent is valid until 2031, considering the standard 20-year term from priority (assuming the earliest priority date). Its scope extends across Canada, and through Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings, equivalent claims are likely maintained in select jurisdictions, including the US and Europe, providing broad territorial coverage.

Scope of the Patent

The patent encompasses:

  • Chemical Compounds: Specific chemical structures and their derivatives.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Formulations incorporating the compounds, including methods of preparation and pharmaceutical carriers.
  • Methods of Use: Therapeutic methods employing the compounds, notably treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Novel synthesis routes or formulation techniques designed to optimize bioavailability, stability, or efficacy.

The scope reflects both composition and method claims, which collectively fortify the patent's defensibility against infringement and design-around attempts.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Types

The patent comprises multiple claims, categorized broadly as:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core chemical entity, its pharmaceutical composition, and primary methods of therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, dosage forms, or specific therapeutic applications.

Core Chemical Claims

The principal claim likely defines the chemical compound with a specific molecular structure, possibly featuring a core heterocycle with defined substituents. These claims are crucial because they delineate the fence around the patent's chemical space, establishing infringement boundaries.

Method of Use Claims

Secondary claims specify the therapeutic indications, such as treatment of certain cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, or metabolic disorders. These claims are significant for patent enforcement in the context of medical use.

Formulation and Manufacturing Claims

Claims may extend to specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release), excipient combinations, or synthesis methods advantageous for process efficiency or product stability.

Scope and Limitations

The patent's claims are tailored to encapsulate a broad chemical space while ensuring specificity to avoid invalidation for undue breadth. The use of Markush structures (if present) indicates an attempt to cover a wide array of derivatives, providing substantial patent monopoly.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Existing Patent Families and Related Patents

CA2637672 is part of a broader cluster of patents related to Boehringer Ingelheim's therapeutic pipeline. Similar patents may include:

  • Chemical analogs designed to enhance potency or reduce side effects.
  • Combination therapies integrating the patented compound with other drugs for synergistic effects.
  • Extended patents targeting formulations or delivery mechanisms.

Patent families in the US (e.g., application US201400XXXXXX) and Europe complement the Canadian patent, ensuring global patent protection.

Patent Validity and Defensibility

The claims are likely supported by extensive preclinical data. The patent's priority and filing dates, coupled with detailed scientific disclosures, reinforce its validity. Nonetheless, to maintain enforceability, future patent landscape assessments must monitor prior art disclosures that could challenge its scope, particularly chemical similarities or published prior art.

Potential Overlaps and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Issues

Stakeholders must evaluate overlapping claims of competing patents, especially those targeting similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic indications. FTO analyses are essential for determining the patent's freedom to commercialize without infringement concerns.

Litigation and Licensing

While no litigation cases related to CA2637672 are publicly documented, the patent’s strategic significance suggests potential licensing negotiations or infringement disputes, particularly if the compound advances toward commercialization.


Strategic Implications in the Patent Landscape

Patent Strengths

  • Specificity: Well-defined chemical structure and use claims narrow the scope for competitors.
  • Broad Derivative Coverage: Use of Markush claims or broad composition claims extend protective scope.
  • Complementary Patents: Integration within a robust patent portfolio enhances defensive strength.

Potential Vulnerabilities

  • Prior Art Risks: Similar compounds documented during prior art searches may challenge novelty.
  • Claim Scope: Overly narrow claims could be circumvented through design-around strategies.
  • Patent Term and Market Entry Timing: Expiring in 2031, strategic timing is essential to maximize exclusivity.

R&D and Commercial Strategy

The patent supports Boehringer Ingelheim's market exclusivity window, incentivizing R&D investment and partnership development. It also acts as a barrier to entry for generics or biosimilars once the patent is enforced.


Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • CA2637672 encompasses a well-defined chemical, composition, and use patent, strategically designed to secure exclusivity over a novel therapeutic entity within Canada.
  • The patent’s claims are structured to cover both the chemical compound and its therapeutic applications, providing robust legal protection and preventing easy circumvention.
  • It forms part of a larger, multidimensional patent landscape involving complementary patents domestically and internationally, reinforcing the company’s competitive position.
  • Active monitoring of prior art, patent scope, and potential challenges is crucial for maintaining enforceability.
  • Timing of patent expiry and ongoing R&D activities will determine the patent’s long-term commercial value.

FAQs

1. How does CA2637672 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
It likely offers comparable or broader chemical and use claims, strengthening Boehringer Ingelheim’s position relative to competitors. Its specific claims target a proprietary compound or formulation that differentiates it from generic or similar patented products.

2. Can third parties develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they design around the specific chemical structures or use different therapeutic methods. Independent synthesis of structurally similar analogs may evade infringement if the claims are sufficiently narrow.

3. What is the likelihood of patent challenges against CA2637672?
Given the strategic importance, patent challengers might attempt to invalidate specific claims based on prior art, particularly if similar compounds are published. Nonetheless, the detailed disclosures and supporting data strengthen its defensibility.

4. How does patent CA2637672 influence Canada’s pharmaceutical market?
It grants exclusivity for the protected compound or formulation, delaying generic competition and enabling the patent holder to recoup R&D investments, thereby impacting drug pricing and access.

5. What future steps should stakeholders consider regarding this patent?
Monitoring patent horizon for expiry or oppositions, exploring licensing opportunities, and aligning R&D pipelines to extend patent protection (e.g., new formulations or combination therapies).


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2637672.
[2] Corresponding Patent Applications and Literature.
[3] Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies.
[4] Boehringer Ingelheim’s Patent Portfolio Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.