You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI1009619


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI1009619

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 7, 2030 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 7, 2030 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 7, 2030 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 7, 2030 Veroscience CYCLOSET bromocriptine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Brazil Patent BRPI1009619

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI1009619, granted by the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), represents a significant piece of intellectual property in the pharmaceutical domain. To assess its strategic value, legal robustness, and positioning within the patent landscape, a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and relevant prior art landscape is essential. This report delves into these aspects, focusing on how the patent shapes the proprietary rights in its targeted pharmaceutical segment, the breadth of its claims, and its standing relative to global patent activity.

Scope of Patent BRPI1009619

The scope of INPI patent BRPI1009619 centers around a specific pharmaceutical invention—likely involving a novel compound, formulation, or method of use—though explicit content specifics are essential for precise interpretation. Typically, such patents aim to secure exclusivity over inventive features perceived to provide a technical advantage, thus preventing unauthorized use or production.

The patent's territorial scope is exclusively within Brazil, with the protection arising from national rights, but it may influence regional patent strategies if the invention’s rights extend into other jurisdictions through international filings like PCT or regional patent applications.

The legal scope explicitly depends on the claims' wording, which determines the affirmatively protected features, and the description, which provides the supporting technical disclosure. As it is common in pharmaceutical patents, the scope may be divided into:

  • Compound Claims: Covering specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Formulation Claims: Protecting specific combinations or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering particular therapeutic indications or treatment methods.
  • Process Claims: Describing synthesis or manufacturing processes.

A critical assessment requires analyzing whether the patent’s wording encompasses narrowly defined inventions or broader categories, which significantly impacts its enforceability and vulnerability to design-around strategies.

Claims Analysis

The claims define the crux of protection and determine infringement boundaries. They are typically divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Chemical Compound or Composition: If BRPI1009619 claims a specific chemical entity, the scope is confined to that molecule's structure, possibly with defined salts, esters, or derivatives.
  • Method of Treatment: If claiming therapeutic methods, the scope extends to particular medical indications or routes of administration.
  • Manufacturing Process: If claiming a process, protection covers specific steps or conditions.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims usually specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, concentrations, or auxiliary ingredients, narrowing the scope but reinforcing the patent’s defensibility.

Assessment of Claims Breadth and Validity:

  • Novelty & Inventive Step: For claims to be valid, the invention must demonstrate novelty over existing art and an inventive step. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.
  • Claim Language Precision: Precise language supports enforceability, whereas vague claims risk being challenged or invalidated.

Potential Limitations:

  • Narrow claims restrict infringement scope but can be easier to defend.
  • Broader claims increase market control but risk invalidation without sufficient inventive contributions.

Claims Set and Strategic Consideration

A balanced claims set includes a combination of broad and narrow claims, optimizing patent strength and market coverage. Examining the actual claim language (not provided in this context) is necessary for a nuanced understanding but general principles suggest the protection likely targets specific compounds and associated methods.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

The patent landscape surrounding BRPI1009619 involves analyzing:

  • Prior Patents and Patents Applications: Including patents in Brazil, PCT publications, and regional filings in key markets like the US, EU, and China.
  • Scientific Literature: Published research, especially recent studies, that might disclose similar compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Global Competitive Activity: Market competitors may have filed similar or overlapping patents, influencing freedom-to-operate and licensing strategies.

In pharmaceutical patent landscapes, key issues often involve:

  • Overlap with Known Compounds: Many pharmaceutical patents involve modifications of known molecules to achieve improved efficacy or pharmacokinetics, which can limit patentability unless sufficiently inventive.
  • Method of Use vs Compound Claims: In some cases, the method of use claims may be easier to design around than compound claims.

Recent Trends:

  • Increased patent filings around novel derivatives, formulations with improved bioavailability, or combination therapies.
  • Use of patent term extensions and data exclusivity periods to extend market protection.

Legal and Commercial Implications:

  • The robustness of BRPI1009619 depends on its claim patentability amidst the prior art landscape.
  • Patent stratagems such as claims to polymorphs, isomers, or novel manufacturing processes are common to fortify protection.

Legal Status and Enforcement

As of its granting, the patent's enforceability within Brazil is upheld, providing exclusivity. Challenges could stem from:

  • Oppositions or Nullity Actions: Filed by third parties citing lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Design Around Strategies: Competitors may modify molecular structures or formulations to avoid infringement.
  • Patent Term and Regulatory Data Exclusivity: The patent's remaining term influences commercial viability, aligned with marketing approval timelines.

Conclusion

BRPI1009619’s scope, shaped by its claims, reflects a targeted innovation—likely a specific pharmaceutical compound or method. Its strategic value lies in the specificity of its claims and its position amidst a competitive landscape characterized by existing prior art. Ensuring robust claim language, continuous monitoring of prior art, and implementing patent strategies involving auxiliary claims are essential for maintaining protection.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth & Specificity: The strength of BRPI1009619 hinges on its claim scope—balanced claims covering broad inventive concepts with narrower dependent claims provide robust protection.
  • Prior Art Navigation: The patent’s validity depends on rigorous differentiation from prior patents and scientific disclosures; ongoing patent landscape analysis is critical.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent’s role in broader patent portfolios influencing market exclusivity, licensing, and partnerships.
  • Legal Vigilance: Active monitoring for potential nullity actions or licensing opportunities can sustain patent value.
  • Global Considerations: Complementing national protection with international filings maximizes market control.

FAQs

  1. What is the main inventive feature protected by Brazil patent BRPI1009619?
    Without the specific claims text, it is presumed to cover a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. The key inventive feature would be the unique aspect that distinguishes it from existing similar inventions.

  2. How broad are the claims likely to be in BRPI1009619?
    Patent claims generally aim for a balance, possibly including both narrow compound-specific claims and broader method claims. The actual breadth determines market scope and vulnerability to design-around strategies.

  3. What risks does BRPI1009619 face from prior art?
    The primary risks involve prior patents or scientific publications disclosing similar compounds or methods that could challenge novelty or inventive step, potentially nullifying the patent or limiting its enforcement.

  4. Can BRPI1009619 be enforced effectively?
    Effectiveness depends on the claim clarity, enforcement resources, and the scope relative to prior art. Given its granted status, it provides enforceable rights in Brazil, but proactive enforcement and legal vigilance are essential.

  5. Is BRPI1009619 part of a broader patent portfolio?
    Likely, pharmaceutical firms file multiple patents around the core invention—covering derivatives, formulations, or methods—to strengthen market control and fallback options in litigation or licensing.


Sources

  1. INPI Patent Database.
  2. Global Patent Search Databases (WIPO, EPO, USPTO).
  3. Pharmaceutical patent legal frameworks in Brazil.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends.
  5. Scientific literature on the relevant medicinal chemistry or formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.