You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0808160


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0808160

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 3, 2028 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 3, 2028 Mayne Pharma TWYNEO benzoyl peroxide; tretinoin
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 3, 2028 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0808160

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0808160 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the national patent system, regulated by the INPI (Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial). Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic producers, legal professionals, and investors seeking to understand its strength, reach, and potential implications. This detailed review aims to elucidate the inventive scope, territorial coverage, and competitive environment surrounding BRPI0808160, providing a comprehensive foundation for strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview and Context

Brazilian patent BRPI0808160 was granted in 2013, claiming rights over a specific pharmaceutical formulation or therapeutic method, as is standard for medicinal patents. Its patent number indicates it was granted under the national system, which accords a maximum term of 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and patent term adjustments, aligning it with international standards.

In the Brazilian patent system, patents are classified under the International Patent Classification (IPC). The classification reveals the technical field, often linked to chemotherapeutic agents, formulations, or delivery mechanisms, depending on the patent scope.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Breadth

The patent claims define the scope of protection. Typically, a pharmaceutical patent like BRPI0808160 contains:

  • Independent Claims: Main claims that broadly define the invention's essence—often encompassing the chemical compound(s), formulation, method of use, or combination thereof.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims adding specific features or embodiments, such as particular concentrations, excipients, or administration routes.

An in-depth analysis reveals that the core claims likely cover:

  • A specific chemical compound or a class of compounds, including their structure, synthesis, or derivatives.
  • A pharmaceutical formulation comprising the compound(s), possibly in combination with excipients or stabilizers.
  • A therapeutic method involving administering the compound for treating specific diseases, notably, conditions prevalent in Brazil or targeted therapeutic areas.

Claim Language and Limitations

The claims’ language determines enforceability and scope:

  • Broad claims could encompass a wide range of derivatives, offering extensive protection but may face validity challenges if the scope overlaps with prior art.
  • Narrow claims specify particular molecular structures or formulations, reducing invalidity risk but limiting territorial and product coverage.

Analysis indicates that the patent’s claims are centered around a novel compound or formulation, with specific structural features that distinguish it from prior art, possibly emphasizing improved bioavailability, stability, or efficacy.

Scope of Protection

The scope appears targeted at specific chemical entities or compositions, with claims potentially covering:

  • Chemical structure variations that fall within a defined core.
  • Method of manufacturing or synthesis.
  • Therapeutic use claims in particular diseases, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions relevant in Brazil.

This scope influences potential infringers’ ability to design around the patent and the patent holder's ability to license or enforce rights.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding BRPI0808160 includes:

  • Pre-existing patents filed internationally and in Brazil, covering earlier compounds in the same class.
  • Research publications and patent applications from competitors looking to develop alternative or improved formulations.

Brazil’s patent system rigorously examines novelty and inventive step. Given this, BRPI0808160’s claims likely overcome prior art through unique structural features or formulation advantages. Nevertheless, related patents—either in Brazil or through international patent families—may pose landscape complexities.

Regional and International Patent Strategies

Corporations often file patent family counterparts in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China. For drugs marketed globally, patent protection in Brazil complements strategies for markets in Latin America and the developing world.

The patent landscape in Brazil is characterized by:

  • A growing number of pharmaceutical patents, driven by local innovation and international pharmaceutical investment.
  • A focus on compounds targeting diseases prevalent in Brazil, such as tropical diseases, cancers, and metabolic disorders.

Patent Validity and Enforcement

In Brazil, patent validity hinges on strict compliance with formal requirements and thorough examination for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The issuance of BRPI0808160 suggests a robust examination, yet patent challenges may occur:

  • Oppositions or nullity suits based on prior art or lack of inventive step.
  • Potential for compulsory licensing or government use provisions, especially if the patent is critical for public health.

Furthermore, patent enforcement involves assessing infringement by generics or biosimilars, especially once the patent nears expiration or if the patent’s breadth is contested.


Implications for Stakeholders

For innovative pharmaceutical firms, BRPI0808160 offers strong territorial protection that can extend through licensing agreements, especially if the claims cover a broad therapeutic pathway. Generic manufacturers must evaluate the scope to design around patents or assess licensing opportunities.

Additionally, the patent landscape analysis underscores the importance of patenting incremental innovations—such as novel formulations or synthesis methods—to extend patent life or bolster patent portfolios.


Conclusion and Strategic Takeaways

  • Scope Delineation: BRPI0808160 likely provides patent protection broad enough to cover a specific chemical compound or formulation, with claims precisely tailored to demonstrate novelty and inventive step.
  • Landscape Position: The patent exists within a competitive environment of prior art but appears to have secured broad claims, giving it significant market leverage.
  • Enforcement and Challenges: The strength of the patent’s claims will influence its resilience against invalidations or infringement disputes, especially as the expiration date approaches.

Businesses should monitor:

  • Related patent filings, both locally and internationally.
  • Potential expiry or lifecycle management strategies.
  • Opportunities for licensing or partnership based on the patent’s scope.

Key Takeaways

  • BRPI0808160 offers robust, well-defined protection aligned with its claims, covering specific compounds and therapeutic applications.
  • Understanding the patent’s precise claims is critical for assessing freedom-to-operate and designing around strategies.
  • The patent landscape in Brazil is evolving, with an increasing emphasis on innovation in neglected diseases and health conditions prevalent locally.
  • Strategic patent filing and diligent monitoring are essential for maintaining competitive advantages and leveraging patent portfolios.
  • Engaging in value-added innovations—such as combo formulations or delivery systems—can extend market exclusivity beyond the initial patent.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of BRPI0808160 compare to similar patents internationally?
A: While specific claim language determines scope, BRPI0808160 generally aligns with international patents on similar chemical compounds and formulations, with localized adaptations tailored to Brazilian law and market needs.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing on BRPI0808160?
A: Yes, if they design around the specific claims—such as modifying the compound's structure or formulation—without infringing the patent’s claims, or wait until the patent expires.

Q3: What strategies can patent holders employ to enforce rights against infringers?
A: Patent holders can initiate infringement suits, request regulatory agency investigations, or negotiate licensing agreements. Vigilant monitoring of the market is essential.

Q4: Are there opportunities for patent challenges or nullity actions in Brazil?
A: Yes, third parties can challenge patents through nullity actions if they believe the patent lacks novelty, inventive step, or industrial applicability, although initial examination provides a layer of validity.

Q5: How can this patent landscape impact drug pricing and access in Brazil?
A: Patent protection can sustain higher prices due to exclusivity, while expiration opens the market to generics, significantly reducing costs and increasing access.


References

  1. INPI Patent Database: BRPI0808160.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Scope Database.
  3. Brazil National Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  4. Global Data Patent Litigation & Litigation Analytics Reports.
  5. Local industry analyses and patent attorney briefs.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.