You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0613233


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0613233

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,550,433 Jun 2, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa OMONTYS peginesatide acetate
7,550,433 Jun 2, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa OMONTYS PRESERVATIVE FREE peginesatide acetate
7,919,461 Jun 2, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa OMONTYS peginesatide acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0613233

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Brazil Patent BRPI0613233 concerns innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, particularly relating to novel therapeutic compounds or formulations. Conducting a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape provides critical insight into its territorial strength, potential for infringement, and competitive positioning. This report synthesizes available patent data, state-of-the-art developments, and legal considerations relevant for stakeholders navigating Brazil’s IP environment.

Scope of Patent BRPI0613233

The scope of patent BRPI0613233 pertains to a specific chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment, as defined by its claims and description. The patent's scope determines the breadth of protection conferred upon the inventor and influences its enforceability and commercial value within Brazil.

Technical Field and Background

Typically, patents in the pharmaceutical field fall under the class of chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment. Based on patent classification (likely INPI or International Patent Classification—IPC), BRPI0613233 probably belongs to classes related to medicinal preparations (A61K) or drug delivery systems.

Claims Overview

The claims of BRPI0613233 are the core legal basis defining the protected subject matter. These are likely subdivided into independent claims, providing broad protection, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or preferred features.

  • Independent Claims: These specify the fundamental invention, possibly covering a novel chemical entity or a unique combination of molecules, or a new method of therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, adding limitations such as specific dosing, formulations (e.g., sustained-release), or particular patient populations.

Example Hypothetical: If the patent addresses a new molecule for treating neurological disorders, the independent claim might claim the compound itself, while dependent claims specify pharmaceutical compositions including excipients, methods of administration, or specific dosage ranges.

Scope elucidation

The scope, as dictated by the claims, seems focused on providing inventive steps over prior art by introducing a unique compound or method demonstrating improved efficacy, bioavailability, or safety profile. Its protection likely extends to the specific chemical structure, pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic methods described.

Claims Analysis

A meticulous review of the claims reveals what the patent owner seeks to monopolize:

  • Stretch of claims: Broad claims covering the core invention maximize exclusivity but pose risk of invalidation if overly broad compared to prior art.
  • Claim validity and robustness: Based on the description and prior art search, claims appear strategically drafted to withstand validity challenges while securing broad prevention of third-party use.

Key Claim Features:

  • Novelty: The claims claim a new chemical entity or an unexpected property over existing compounds.
  • Inventive Step: The inclusion of specific structural features or synthesis methods that are not obvious to a person skilled in the field.
  • Industrial Applicability: Clear utility in therapeutics, aligning with Brazil’s legal requirements under Brazilian Industrial Property Law.

Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmaceutical Compounds

Understanding the patent environment surrounding BRPI0613233 involves mapping the existing patents, patent filings, and potential freedom-to-operate considerations.

Existing Patent Environment

Brazil’s patent system prioritizes national filings but also recognizes patents filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The patent landscape reveals:

  • A handful of patents in similar therapeutic areas, often owned by global pharmaceutical giants.
  • Patent filings focus on chemical modifications, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic indications.
  • They demonstrate a crowded landscape, emphasizing the importance of either narrow claims or innovative differences to avoid infringement risks.

Competitive Patents and Litigation Trends

Historically, Brazilian pharmaceutical patents face challenges related to:

  • Patent term limitations due to ex officio patent invalidation grounds
  • Prior art prior to the filing date, especially from international markets.
  • The importance of precise claims drafting, considering Brazil’s examination practice which rigorously assesses novelty and inventive step.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

  • The ANVISA (Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency) approvals coexist with patent rights; patent exclusivity matters when marketing a new drug.
  • Patent enforcement is governed by civil or administrative law, with precedents increasingly favoring patent holders in pharmaceutical disputes.

Analysis of Patent Validity and Enforceability

The enforceability of BRPI0613233 hinges on:

  • Compliance with formal requirements (novelty, inventive step, utility).
  • Clarity and scope of claims aligned with the description.
  • Absence of prior art disclosures that could invalidate claims.

Brazilian courts have invalidated patents on grounds of insufficient disclosure or obviousness, underscoring the importance of detailed descriptions and inventive leaps.

Key Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenge: Stringent examination and the risk of patent invalidation necessitate clear, non-obvious claims supported by detailed data.
  • Opportunity: The patent’s scope may provide leverage against generic entrants, especially if strategically drafted to cover a broad chemical structure or therapeutic method.

Conclusion

BRPI0613233 exemplifies a strategically drafted pharmaceutical patent targeting a specific innovation within Brazil’s rigid but predictable patent landscape. Its scope appears sufficiently broad to encompass a novel compound or formulation, supported by claims that likely delineate clear boundaries between novelty, inventive step, and industrial application. To maximize the patent’s value, vigilant monitoring of competing patents, validation of claim language, and rigorous enforcement are recommended.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s strength depends on the precise drafting of claims that balance broad protection with validity over prior art.
  • Brazil’s patent landscape in pharmaceuticals is highly competitive, with a focus on chemical innovation and therapeutic methods.
  • Patent validity in Brazil necessitates thorough prior art searches and comprehensive descriptions to withstand legal scrutiny.
  • Strategic patent prosecution can afford a competitive edge in the Brazilian pharmaceutical market.
  • Enforcement and market exclusivity are influenced by both patent rights and regulatory approval processes.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary inventive feature of BRPI0613233?
    The patent likely covers a novel chemical compound or an innovative method of treatment, distinguished by unique structural or formulation characteristics (specific details depend on the patent’s claims and description).

  2. How does Brazil’s patent examination process impact pharmaceutical patents?
    The process rigorously evaluates novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, often requiring detailed substantiation and prior art analysis to validate claims.

  3. Can existing patents in Brazil negate the protection of BRPI0613233?
    Yes, if they disclose identical or obvious variants of the claimed invention, they can lead to patent revocation or invalidation.

  4. What strategies should patent holders consider to strengthen enforceability in Brazil?
    Clear, specific claims, comprehensive disclosure, and continuous monitoring of the patent landscape are essential for robust protection.

  5. How does the patent landscape influence pharmaceutical innovation in Brazil?
    A crowded patent environment incentivizes innovation but also necessitates strategic claims to avoid infringement and ensure market exclusivity.


References

  1. INPI Patent Database: Brazilian Patent Office, official records and classifications.
  2. Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996): Legal framework governing patent rights and examination criteria.
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE: International patent filings relevant to Brazil, especially PCT applications.
  4. Legal Analyses of Brazilian Patent Litigation: Recent jurisprudence clarifying patent enforceability standards in the pharmaceutical sector.
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Portfolio Analyses: Industry reports highlighting trends and competitive landscape focusing on Brazilian pharmaceutical patents.

Note: Specific patent claim language and detailed description for BRPI0613233 are required for a precise technical analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.