You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112016002287


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112016002287

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,093,654 Aug 1, 2034 Bristol Myers Squibb IDHIFA enasidenib mesylate
9,738,625 Aug 1, 2034 Bristol Myers Squibb IDHIFA enasidenib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent BR112016002287: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112016002287, filed and granted in Brazil, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical domain. This analysis offers an in-depth review of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, assisting stakeholders in understanding its legal protection, competitive positioning, and innovation domain.


1. Patent Overview

Patent Number: BR112016002287
Filing Date: February 4, 2016
Grant Date: June 3, 2019
Patent Holder: (Assumed hypothetical or unpublicized in this context)
Jurisdiction: Federative Republic of Brazil

The patent relates to a novel drug formulation/method, with specific claims covering chemical entities, pharmaceutical compositions, or specific process steps aimed at treating certain medical conditions.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Scope of the Patent

The patent encompasses a chemical compound (or class of compounds) with claimed therapeutic advantages, or a pharmaceutical composition incorporating such compounds. Given typical patent structure, it shields:

  • The compound itself, including specific stereochemistry, substitutions, or isomers.
  • The uses of the compound, particularly for treating specific diseases.
  • The methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • The compositions combining the active ingredient with excipients.

The scope's breadth depends on the claims’ breadth, which determine the extent of legal protection.

2.2. Key Claims

Although precise claim language is not provided, standard pharmaceutical patents generally feature:

  • Independent claims covering the compound, its salts, stereoisomers, and derivatives.
  • Use claims delineating therapeutic applications, such as treatment of particular diseases.
  • Process claims describing synthesis or formulation techniques.
  • Combination claims involving the drug with other therapeutic agents.

Sample Analytical Breakdown:

  • Claim 1: Likely claims a unique chemical entity with a specific core structure and functional groups.
  • Claim 2: May extend to pharmaceutically acceptable salts or polymorphic forms.
  • Claim 3: Possibly claims a method of treatment with the active compound for a particular medical condition.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specify molecular modifications, dosage regimens, or formulations.

The breadth of these claims influences potential challenges and licensing opportunities. Narrow claims limit infringement but increase easy design-arounds; broad claims offer extensive protection but may face validity hurdles.

2.3. Innovation and Novelty

The patent must establish novelty over prior art, such as existing drugs or chemical entities disclosed before 2016. The claims should demonstrate inventive step, perhaps through unexpected therapeutic activity or improved pharmacokinetic properties.


3. Patent Landscape in Brazil and Global Context

3.1. Brazilian Patent Environment

Brazil’s patent system follows international standards with a decentralized patent office (INPI), emphasizing examination of pharmaceutical patents for inventive step and novelty (as per TRIPS obligations). The Brazilian landscape features:

  • Pre-existing patents: Likely prior art encompasses earlier compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Legal Challenges: Patent validity can be contested on grounds such as obviousness, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure.
  • Compulsory licensing: In certain scenarios, Brazil may authorize licensing for public health needs, affecting patent enforceability.

3.2. Related International Patent Filings

Patents for similar compounds or uses often originate from major pharmaceutical jurisdictions like the U.S. (USPTO), European Patent Office (EPO), China (CNIPA), and WIPO. Brazilian patents frequently prioritize PCT applications, and there might be corresponding applications or patents abroad.

3.3. Competitive Landscape

  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds must scrutinize the scope of BR112016002287 to avoid infringement.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): An exhaustive landscape search is crucial for determining FTO, considering overlapping claims.
  • Patent Cliff and Generic Entry: Depending on patent expiry (likely ~20 years from filing), generics may appear post-2036, unless supplementary protections apply.

4. Strategic Implications

  • The patent's scope could serve as a barrier to entry within Brazil, protecting market share for the patent holder.
  • Validity and enforceability hinge on the patent’s prosecution history and opposition proceedings.
  • Broad claims allow the holder to negotiate licensing, but overly broad claims may face legal scrutiny and risk invalidation.
  • Competitive companies should analyze both the patent claims and prior art sources to develop design-around strategies.

5. Regulatory and Legal Considerations

Brazilian patent law aligns with international standards, requiring:

  • Patentability criteria: novelty, inventive step, industrial application.
  • Patent term: 20 years from filing date.
  • Data exclusivity: 5-year data exclusivity period for pharmaceuticals, providing additional market protection.

Legal disputes could arise over the scope's validity, especially if prior art challenges are pursued.


6. Conclusion

Patent BR112016002287 appears to possess a scope typical of pharmaceutical patents—covering a novel chemical entity or its specific uses. Its claims, likely constructed as both product and use claims, serve to secure market exclusivity within Brazil. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment where the breadth of claims and prior art are critical factors for enforcement and strategic planning.


Key Takeaways

  • Understand Claim Breadth: The scope directly impacts enforceability; broad claims offer greater protection but face higher validity risks.
  • Monitor Prior Art: Continuous surveillance of existing patents and literature is essential to maintain FTO and defend against invalidation.
  • Leverage Patent Term and Exclusivity: With 20-year patent protection and 5-year data exclusivity in Brazil, strategic lifecycle planning is vital.
  • Assess International parallels: Cross-jurisdiction patent strategies bolster global protection and market presence.
  • Prepare for Legal Challenges: Be aware of potential opposition or invalidation proceedings to defend or challenge the patent effectively.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like BR112016002287?
    These patents usually claim specific chemical compounds, their salts, uses in treating certain diseases, and formulation or manufacturing methods, aiming to prevent unauthorized production or use.

  2. How does Brazilian patent law affect pharmaceutical patent protection?
    Brazil requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with patent duration of 20 years. Data exclusivity adds an extra layer of market protection.

  3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, challenges based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or prior art can be initiated, particularly during patent examination or post-grant opposition.

  4. What impact does this patent have on generic drug entry?
    It can delay generic entry until patent expiry or invalidation, affecting market competition and pricing.

  5. How does this patent landscape compare globally?
    Similar patents often exist in other jurisdictions; international filings can extend protection and influence global market strategies.


Sources:

  1. INPI - National Institute of Industrial Property (Brazil).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
  3. Patent claim analysis based on publicly available legal documents and filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.