You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112015022070


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112015022070

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 9, 2033 Chiesi KENGREAL cangrelor
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 10, 2030 Chiesi KENGREAL cangrelor
⤷  Get Started Free May 13, 2029 Chiesi KENGREAL cangrelor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112015022070

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction
Brazilian patent BR112015022070 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations, with significant implications for market exclusivity, licensing, and competitive positioning within Brazil’s burgeoning pharmaceutical patent landscape. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and position within Brazil’s IP framework, providing a comprehensive understanding for stakeholders, including innovators, legal professionals, and market analysts.


Overview of Patent BR112015022070

Patent BR112015022070 was granted under the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) in 2015. It primarily claims a specific pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacturing, or formulation, tied to a particular therapeutic application—though exact technical details necessitate further disclosure. Its priority likely traces to an international application, possibly under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), underscoring strategic patent filing activity by innovator entities in Brazil.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Type and Nature of Claims

The patent comprises both independent and dependent claims. Independent claims broadly define the core inventive concept—be it a novel compound, formulation, or manufacturing process—while dependent claims add specific embodiments or refinements.

Key Claim Elements

The scope hinges on vital parameters:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims specify the molecular structure, ratios, or specific combinations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). For example, a claim may encompass a compound with a unique substituent pattern or chiral configuration.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims extend to specific dosage forms such as sustained-release tablets, transdermal patches, or injectable formulations, emphasizing controlled delivery or bioavailability enhancements.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims may cover proprietary synthesis routes, purification steps, or formulation techniques, aiming to secure process innovation as well as product protection.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims sometimes extend to the use of the composition in treating particular conditions, aligning with "use patents" common in pharmaceuticals.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The breadth of the claims indicates strong protection, especially if they encompass a wide range of chemical variants or formulations. However, Brazilian patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, which constrains overly broad claims. For instance, if the claims only cover a specific compound with a narrow therapeutic application, they offer limited scope but more robust defensibility against prior art challenges.

Claim Strategies and Potential Implications

  • Potential for Patent Thickets: Multiple claims covering various formulations and manufacturing methods increase patent robustness but could complicate freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses for competitors.
  • Use of Markush Groups or Functional Language: Such language broadens the scope but may invite validity challenges, especially if claims are overly generic.
  • Secondary Claims: Dependent claims refining the independent claim can extend patent life and client options, though their scope is narrower.

Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmaceuticals

Regulatory and Patent Environment

Brazil’s patent system is governed by the Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996) and aligns with international standards via agreements like TRIPS. The pharmaceutical patent landscape has evolved notably since Brazil’s adherence to TRIPS, balancing innovation incentives with access considerations.

Patent Filing Trends and Strategic Considerations

  • Incremental Innovation: Brazilian filings often focus on formulations or manufacturing processes rather than novel compounds, reflecting patent strategy adaptation.
  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: BR112015022070’s protection duration extends 20 years from the filing date, with data exclusivity periods influencing market dynamics.
  • Local vs. International Filings: Many pharmaceutical patents are filed internationally (e.g., via PCT) and validated in Brazil, reinforcing its status as a regional patent target.

Major Competitors and Patent Trends

Competitors likely include multinational pharmaceutical companies and local innovators. Trends show a rise in patent filings around complex formulations, biosimilars, and targeting chronic diseases, suggesting a dynamic competitive landscape with opportunities for patent infringement disputes and licensing.

Legal and Policy Implications

Brazil’s patent law includes compulsory licensing provisions, especially for public health emergencies, which can impact patent enforcement. Recent legal debates focus on patent term adjustments, patent evergreening, and access-to-medicines balance.


Patent Validity and Risk Factors

Prior Art Search and Patentability

The validity of BR112015022070 hinges on novelty and inventive step over existing prior art—comprising published compositions, manufacturing methods, or therapeutic techniques. Landmark cases have scrutinized pharmaceutical patents for obvious modifications, and claims must demonstrate non-obviousness to withstand validity challenges.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness / Inventive Step: If similar formulations or processes exist, the patent may face invalidation risks.
  • Overlap with Existing Patents: The patent landscape must be analyzed to prevent infringement or invalidation due to overlapping claims.
  • Public Health Considerations: Legal instruments exist that facilitate licensing or compulsory licenses, especially if the patent hinders public access.

Current Patent Landscape Context

Brazil’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals has been characterized by increased filings post-TRIPS compliance, with a focus on:

  • Method-of-Use Patents: Covering new therapeutic indications.
  • Formulation Patents: Protecting specific delivery forms that improve bioavailability or patient compliance.
  • Combination Patents: Covering synergistic drug combinations.

This environment demands innovative and well-drafted patent claims to carve out meaningful market exclusivity, often necessitating strategic claim drafting and thorough prior art searches.


Conclusion

Patent BR112015022070 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent tailored to the Brazilian market, with claims likely centered on specific chemical formulations and manufacturing processes. Its scope aims to balance broad protection with validity under Brazilian patent law, aligning with global R&D trends in pharmaceuticals. The patent landscape in Brazil continues to evolve, emphasizing incremental innovations, complex formulations, and regulatory considerations impacting patent validity and market entry.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims Optimization: Ensure claims are specific enough to meet Brazil’s novelty and inventive step requirements yet broad enough to deter copying.
  • Strategic Patent Filing: Leverage international patent applications (PCT) to establish priority and extend protection in Brazil.
  • Landscape Awareness: Monitor local and regional patent filings to identify potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Vigilance: Prepare for validity challenges by conducting comprehensive prior art searches and drafting claims to withstand legal scrutiny.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Consider Brazil’s public health policies and patent exceptions to optimize patent strategy and market planning.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical filing process for pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
    The process involves filing an application with the INPI, undergoing examination for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, followed by publication and grant issuance. Patent term is 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees.

  2. Can patent BR112015022070 be challenged for validity?
    Yes, third parties can file a nullity action within legal deadlines, challenging the patent's novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art indicates overlap or obviousness.

  3. How does Brazil’s patent law affect pharmaceutical patent enforcement?
    Brazil's law emphasizes public health, allowing compulsory licensing and patent flexibilities under certain conditions, which can influence enforcement strategies.

  4. What are the key considerations for patent infringement in Brazil?
    Infringement occurs if a third party produces, markets, or uses a patented invention without authorization, with enforcement requiring proof of patent rights and unauthorized use.

  5. How can patent filings in Brazil enhance a pharmaceutical company's IP portfolio?
    Strategic filings protect innovation, facilitate licensing deals, strengthen market position, and can deter competitors, especially within the regional Latin American market.


Sources:
[1] Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996)
[2] Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) guidelines and examination procedures
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports on South America
[4] Legal analyses of pharmaceutical patent law in Brazil

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.