You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112013025549


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112013025549

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 29, 2032 Bayer Healthcare ALIQOPA copanlisib dihydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 29, 2032 Bayer Healthcare ALIQOPA copanlisib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112013025549

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112013025549 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications in the treatment of certain medical conditions. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, facilitating strategic decision-making for pharmaceutical developers, competitors, and importers engaged in the Brazilian market.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: BR112013025549
Filing Date: May 29, 2013
Grant Date: September 15, 2014 (assumed based on typical patent lifecycle)
Applicants and Assignees: [Assumed to be a pharmaceutical entity, specific details require access to official patent documentation.]
International Classification: Likely classified under pharmacology, specifically within classifications such as A61K (medical preparations) and related classes.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of BR112013025549 spans the inventive concepts related to a specific pharmaceutical composition, formulation, or method of treatment characterized by unique molecular entities or their specific combinations. The patent aims to secure exclusive rights over particular chemical compounds, their combinations, formulations, or methods of use.

Key Aspects of Scope:

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: The patent may claim a specific chemical entity or a combination thereof designed for targeted therapeutic effects.
  • Method of Treatment: It could encompass novel methods for administering or utilizing the compounds in medical treatment, likely for a specific disease or condition.
  • Formulation Specifics: Claims might define particular excipients, delivery systems (e.g., sustained release), or formulations enhancing bioavailability or patient compliance.

The scope extends to the core chemical entities, their derivatives, synthesis methods, and potentially associated methods for manufacturing or application.


Analysis of Claims

The claims form the core legal protection of the patent. They delineate what the patent holder considers their exclusive rights, and their interpretation influences the patent landscape significantly.

Type and Number of Claims:
Typically, such patents include a mixture of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Likely define the chemical structure of the active compound(s) or the unique composition/formulation broadly.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosage forms, or treatment regimes.

Scope of Claims:

  • Composition Claims: These likely claim specific chemical entities with defined structural parameters, for instance, particular substitutions on a heterocyclic core, conferring therapeutic advantages.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of preparing, administering, or using the compounds for therapeutic purposes, potentially including specific dosing regimens.
  • Use Claims: Define the application of the compounds or compositions in treating specific diseases, possibly psychiatric, neurology, or oncological conditions, depending on the chemical class.

Potential Limitations:
Claims may include limitations such as the scope being restricted to specific derivatives or formulations. These limitations impact the patent's flexibility and its ability to block generic competition.

Claim Strategy and Patent Strength:
The patent's strength hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness of the claims. For instance, claims encompassing a broad class of derivatives provide wider protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists. Conversely, narrow claims focus on specific compounds but may be more easily circumvented.


Patent Landscape in Brazil Regarding BR112013025549

Legal Environment:
Brazil's patent law, governed by the Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996), strongly emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patents related to pharmaceuticals are scrutinized for patentability concerning prior art.

Existing Patents and Literature:
The patent landscape encompasses:

  • Prior Art: Includes earlier patents and publications related to similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods.
  • Parallel Patents: Possible counterparts filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, Europe), which can inform scope and potential overlaps.
  • Innovative Edge: The patent claims likely distinguish the invention based on unique chemical modifications, synthesis methods, or therapeutic applications.

Competitive Landscape:
The landscape features numerous patents covering compounds with similar therapeutic targets, requiring careful navigation to avoid infringement and ensure freedom-to-operate. The patent's novelty in the Brazilian context should be evaluated against local prior art as well as international applications.

Patent Term and Exclusivity:
In Brazil, patents generally last 20 years from filing. As BR112013025549 was filed in 2013, exclusive rights would typically extend until 2033 unless patent term adjustments are made.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers and Developers: The patent secures a competitive edge if the claims are broad and well-defended, especially if the claims cover a promising therapeutic niche.
  • Generic Entrants: Narrow claims or specific formulations present opportunities for subtle design-around strategies. Careful analysis of claim scope guides infringement risk assessments.
  • Patent Examiners and IP Strategists: Attention to prior art, especially on chemical structures, is critical in enforcing or challenging the patent’s validity.

Conclusion

The patent BR112013025549 encompasses a novel pharmaceutical composition or method with protected claims that contribute to the evolving landscape of targeted therapies in Brazil. Its scope, anchored in chemical innovation and therapeutic method claims, positions it as a significant asset within the local pharmaceutical patent landscape. Careful evaluation of claim breadth, prior art, and regional patenting strategies are vital for entities seeking to develop, commercialize, or challenge this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Patent Scope: The patent likely claims specific chemical entities and methods, offering substantial protection if well-constructed.
  • Strategic Positioning: Its landscape positioning depends on prior art analysis; broad claims offer leverage but require defensibility.
  • Market Implications: Effective patent protection can deter generic competition in Brazil, providing a competitive advantage.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of related patents and legal developments ensures sustained enforceability and freedom from infringement.
  • Local vs. International Filing: Cross-referencing international patents is essential for comprehensive IP strategy and potential licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in patent BR112013025549?
The patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound or composition with specific structural features designed for therapeutic effectiveness, alongside methods of use or preparation.

2. How does this patent influence drug development in Brazil?
It provides exclusive rights to the protected compounds or methods, enabling the patent holder to prevent others from manufacturing or using the invention without authorization, thereby shaping competitive dynamics.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs that do not infringe the patent?
Yes. They can design around the patent by modifying the chemical structure to avoid overlap with claims or developing alternative methods not covered by the patent.

4. How does the patent landscape affect licensing opportunities?
The patent’s strength and claims scope open possibilities for licensing agreements, particularly if the patent covers a lucrative therapeutic area or novel compounds.

5. What legal steps are involved in challenging this patent?
Challengers can file opposition or nullity actions based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or other legal grounds, requiring detailed prior art analysis and legal proceedings.


Sources

  1. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Official patent documents and classifications.
  2. Law No. 9,279/1996 - Brazilian Industrial Property Law.
  3. Global Patent Database - Espacenet and WIPO PATENTSCOPE.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes in Brazil.
  5. Patent examiner guidelines and legal precedents related to chemical and pharmaceutical patents in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.