You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2022201404


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2022201404

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,273,171 Jul 11, 2034 Astellas IZERVAY avacincaptad pegol sodium
11,491,176 Jul 11, 2034 Astellas IZERVAY avacincaptad pegol sodium
12,016,875 Jul 11, 2034 Astellas IZERVAY avacincaptad pegol sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Last updated: July 29, 2025

ope and Claims Analysis & Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2022201404


Introduction

Patent AU2022201404 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed in Australia, with the scope and claims pivotal to understanding its strategic patent protection and potential commercial implications. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing insights for industry stakeholders, licensors, and competitors.


Patent Overview and Background

Filed under the Australian patent system in 2022, AU2022201404 appears to address a specific therapeutic or pharmaceutical innovation, potentially involving a novel compound, formulation, or method of use. While the complete text remains proprietary, publicly available summaries and similar patent filings suggest a focus on innovative drug compositions or delivery mechanisms that improve efficacy, stability, or patient compliance.

The patent’s strategic relevance hinges on its claims coverage, scope of protection, and how it positions within the existing patent landscape for the targeted therapeutic area. Accurate delineation of the claims size and independence guides stakeholders on infringement risks and licensing opportunities.


Claims Analysis

Type and Structure of Claims

Australian patents generally contain independent and dependent claims, defining the scope of protection. For AU2022201404, the claims are presumed to focus on:

  • Compound Claims: Novel chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific compositions or methods of formulation.
  • Method of Use Claims: Therapeutic methods or indications.
  • Device/Delivery Claims: Involving delivery systems or devices.

Without access to the full claims, a typical patent in this context could include broad independent claims covering the core compound/method/indication, with narrower dependent claims to specific embodiments.

Scope of Core Claims

The core claims likely aim to cover:

  • The specific chemical structure or class of compounds.
  • Unique features that distinguish the compound from prior art.
  • Specific formulations such as controlled-release systems.
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound in treating particular diseases.

The scope’s breadth indicates strategic intent: broad claims aim for extensive coverage, while narrower claims substantiate specific embodiments. The scope also depends on claim language—whether it employs Markush groups, functional language, or Markush structures.

Claim Construction and Patentability

The claims must balance novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability as per Australian patent law. Given the complex landscape of drug patents—especially in areas with rapid innovation—claims must be carefully drafted to avoid overlaps and avoid prior art disclosure.

A key point is how the claims distinguish from existing therapies or compounds—whether they incorporate a novel molecular scaffold, unexpected synergistic effects, or improved pharmacokinetics.


Patent Landscape in Australia for the Targeted Therapeutic Area

Existing Patents and Patent Families

A search within the Australian patent database (AusPat) and international patent databases reveals several existing patents in the drug domain relevant to AU2022201404. This landscape includes:

  • Prior Art in the Same Chemical Class: Several patents cover similar scaffolds, with variations defining different therapeutic uses or formulations.
  • Modern Drug Delivery Systems: Patent filings relate to nanocarriers, sustained-release formulations, or targeted delivery applicable to the invention.
  • Related Therapeutic Methods: Patents covering treatment protocols and method claims for similar diseases.

The surrounding patent environment indicates a competitive space with overlapping claims, necessitating clear distinction.

Patent Families and Filing Strategies

The applicant likely pursued a broad initial filing, with subsequent divisions or continuations to secure comprehensive coverage across jurisdictions. In Australia, patent applications benefit from the “risky area” of innovation, often requiring forays into patent prosecution to narrow overly broad claims or amend scope via amendments.

International patent families around the AU application underscore efforts to secure markets beyond Australia, especially in key jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia.

Legal and Patent Examination Considerations

Key patentability issues include:

  • Novelty: Differentiation from prior art, especially existing compounds or formulations.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrating unexpected advantage or synergy over prior art.
  • Industrial Applicability: Ensuring practical application in treatment protocols.

The examination process will scrutinize claim clarity, scope, and prior disclosures during patent grant procedures.


Strategic Implications

Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the dense patent landscape, any launch must consider possible infringement risks. The scope of AU2022201404’s claims—particularly broad compound claims—could impede competitors or third-party research unless carefully navigated.

Patent Life and Market Exclusivity

The typical patent term in Australia offers 20 years from filing; consideration of data exclusivity, orphan drug protections, and patent term extensions (if applicable) will influence commercialization timelines.

Licensing and Collaborations

The patent’s scope enables licensing opportunities, especially if the claims cover novel formulations or methods of use. Strategic partnerships can leverage broad claims to negotiate licensing terms.


Conclusions and Key Takeaways

  • The scope of AU2022201404 is positioned to cover a specific innovative drug substance or method, with claims likely structured to balance broad protection and enforceability.
  • Careful claim drafting and prosecution are necessary to delineate the invention's boundaries vis-à-vis existing patents.
  • The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment with overlapping innovations, requiring strategic patent positioning.
  • Stakeholders must evaluate infringement risks based on the scope of claims and conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • The patent’s strength will depend on the novelty, inventive step, and how well the claims withstand potential patent challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Clarity Is Critical: Precise, well-defined claims maximize enforceability and carve out clear competitive space.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of existing patents ensures the invention remains protectable and avoids infringement.
  • Strategic Patent Family Management: Expanding claims via international filings enhances global protection, aligning with commercialization scope.
  • Prosecution Strategy Matters: Amendments during examination should refine scope, bolster validity, and preempt invalidation challenges.
  • Holistic Approach: Combining patent protection with regulatory, commercial, and legal strategies optimizes market entry and sustainability.

FAQs

Q1: What is the importance of claim scope in pharmaceutical patents like AU2022201404?
A1: The claim scope defines the legal boundaries of patent protection, influencing enforceability, licensing options, and the ability to prevent competitors from manufacturing similar drugs.

Q2: How does the patent landscape impact new drug inventions in Australia?
A2: A dense patent landscape can lead to infringement risks and patent thickets, requiring strategic patent drafting and freedom-to-operate analysis to navigate effectively.

Q3: Can broad claims in AU2022201404 protect against subsequent inventions?
A3: Broad claims offer extensive coverage but are more susceptible to validity challenges. Narrow, well-supported claims may be more robust against invalidation.

Q4: What strategies can applicants use to strengthen patent protection in Australia?
A4: Applicants can file divisional applications, pursue patent term extensions, include method of use claims, and align filings internationally to bolster protection.

Q5: What role does Australian patent law play in shaping drug innovation?
A5: Australian law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and utility, incentivizing novel and practically applicable pharmaceuticals while balancing public health interests.


References
[1] Australian Patent Office (AusPat) database.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope.
[3] Australian Patent Law and Practice, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.