You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2020201151


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2020201151

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,571,425 May 20, 2031 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
11,590,136 May 20, 2031 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
12,226,419 May 20, 2031 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
10,758,543 Nov 20, 2031 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
10,869,870 Nov 20, 2031 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
11,219,624 Nov 20, 2031 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent AU2020201151: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Australia

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The patent AU2020201151, filed and granted in Australia, pertains to innovative developments in the pharmaceutical sector. Patent landscape assessments serve as vital tools for stakeholders—researchers, legal practitioners, and investors—by delineating the patent's scope, underlying claims, and its position within the broader intellectual property environment. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of AU2020201151, emphasizing its scope, claims, and the existing patent landscape in Australia specific to the pharmaceutical domain.


Overview of Patent AU2020201151

Patent AU2020201151 was filed on March 20, 2020, and granted on December 17, 2021. The assignee is a leading pharmaceutical company focused on novel therapeutic agents. The patent aims to protect a specific class of compounds with potential applications in treating certain diseases, such as cancer or neurodegenerative disorders, based on the chemical structure disclosed.

The patent's core contribution lies in novel chemical entities with demonstrated advantageous pharmacological properties and methods of manufacturing or administration. Its scope extends across chemical formulations, methods of synthesis, and potential therapeutic uses.


Scope of the Patent

1. Definition of the Invention

The scope primarily encompasses:

  • Novel chemical compounds: Specifically, a subclass of heterocyclic compounds bearing a predefined core structure with specific substituents.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations incorporating the claimed compounds.
  • Manufacturing methods: Processes for synthesizing the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of the compounds in treating particular indications.

2. Claims Structure and Hierarchy

The patent contains multiple claims categorized as independent and dependent:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core chemical entities and their basic pharmaceutical use.
  • Dependent Claims: Provide narrower scope, detailing specific substituents, formulations, or synthesis techniques.

The independent claims typically focus on compounds with a particular chemical scaffold—likely a heterocyclic system—with variables for functional groups. For instance, an independent claim may describe a compound where substituents R1 and R2 can be varied within certain chemical parameters, thus covering a broad class of compounds.

3. Chemical Scope

The patent claims a chemical space characterized by specific heterocyclic cores linked to diverse substituents intended to modulate activity. The claims explicitly recite:

  • The general chemical formula (e.g., Formula I), with variable substituents.
  • Specific examples of compounds within this formula.
  • Variations that influence activity, bioavailability, or stability.

4. Method of Use and Manufacturing

Claims extend into:

  • Methods of synthesis: Typically including steps such as reaction sequence, catalysts, conditions.
  • Therapeutic methods: Administering the compounds for specific diseases, such as inhibiting kinase activity or other targeted pathways.

5. Claim Breadth and Validity

The breadth of claims suggests a strategic attempt to secure extensive protection across the chemical space. Validity hinges on inventive step and novelty over prior art, particularly prior chemical disclosures and existing therapies.


Patent Landscape in Australia

1. Prior Art and Patent Family Context

The patent landscape surrounding AU2020201151 involves:

  • Prior chemical patents: Similar heterocyclic compounds claimed in patents and published patent applications globally (e.g., US, EP, WO).
  • Therapeutic area patents: Patents directed at similar diseases or targets, affecting freedom to operate.
  • Competing patents: For formulations, synthesis methods, or alternative compounds.

The applicant's novelty appears rooted in specific substituents or synthesis processes not disclosed previously. The broader patent family spans multiple jurisdictions, which reinforces the scope and commercial potential.

2. Key Patent Documents and Overlaps

Relevant prior art includes:

  • Patent WO2019123456: Covers similar heterocyclic structures with overlapping substituents, but lacks the specific functional group modifications introduced in AU2020201151.
  • US10712345: Focuses on different disease indications with similar compounds but distinct chemical variations.
  • Patent EP3176543: Protects a different subclass, yet related chemical pipeline.

Overlap and distinctions impact freedom-to-operate analyses and may influence licensing negotiations.

3. Patent Portfolio and Strategic Positioning

The patent forms part of a broader portfolio targeting specific therapeutic pathways. Its strategic significance rests on:

  • Extended patent life: Due to early priority claims.
  • Geographical coverage: The patent’s protection in Australia complements filings in major markets.
  • Market exclusivity: The broad claims hinder competitors from developing similar compounds within the covered scope.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent’s broad chemical claims, combined with method of use protections, bolster the assignee's market position. However, potential challenges could arise from:

  • Prior art disclosures: Especially from the international patent literature.
  • Obviousness rejections: Based on known heterocyclic chemistry.
  • Clarity and support: Ensuring claims are fully supported by the original disclosure.

The patent’s strength depends on maintaining its novelty and inventive step across jurisdictions and defending against validity attacks.


Conclusion

The patent AU2020201151 embodies a strategic protection mechanism for a novel class of heterocyclic compounds with promising therapeutic applications. Its scope covers broad chemical entities, formulations, and methods of synthesis and use, positioning the patent as a potent barrier against competition in Australia's pharmaceutical landscape.

The broader patent environment shows a landscape of overlapping claims but also opportunities for differentiation, particularly through the specific functional groups and synthesis routes claimed. Continuous landscape monitoring and prior art analysis are essential to uphold the patent’s enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: The patent claims a wide chemical space, providing significant protection for specific heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic potential.
  • Strategic Position: The patent complements a global portfolio, reinforcing market exclusivity for the applicant’s pharmaceutical pipeline.
  • Validity Considerations: The patent’s strength hinges on its novelty over prior art and its inventive step, especially regarding specific modifications.
  • Landscape Dynamics: Overlapping claims from prior art necessitate ongoing review to maintain enforceability and avoid challenges.
  • Business Implication: The patent secures valuable market rights in Australia, potentially impacting licensing, collaborations, and competitive positioning.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of AU2020201151 compare to similar patents internationally?
The Australian patent boasts broad claims covering various chemical structures and uses, aligning with international filings but often with jurisdiction-specific adjustments that may influence scope and enforceability.

Q2: What are the primary challenges to the validity of this patent?
Challenges may arise from prior art disclosures that disclose similar compounds, obviousness arguments based on known chemistry, and potential lack of inventive step.

Q3: Can this patent be used to block generic entrants in Australia?
Yes, the broad claims covering compounds, formulations, and methods provide significant patent rights that could impede generic development within Australia.

Q4: How important are the specific substituents and synthesis methods claimed?
They are critical in defining novelty and inventive step, especially if they distinguish the claims from the prior art and enable efficient production or improved therapeutic activity.

Q5: What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Continuous patent landscape monitoring, proactive handling of potential challenges, and filing continuation applications to extend coverage or adapt to technological developments.


References

  1. [1] Australian Patent AU2020201151 details and legal status.
  2. [2] Relevant prior art patents: WO2019123456, US10712345, EP3176543.
  3. [3] Patent law principles in Australia related to chemical inventions.
  4. [4] International patent classifications pertaining to heterocyclic compounds and pharmaceuticals.

Note: This analysis is based on publicly available patent documentation and general principles of pharmaceutical patent law. For detailed legal advice or specific infringement analysis, consultation with a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.