You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016244279


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016244279

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2034 Novartis TAFINLAR dabrafenib mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2034 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2016244279

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2016244279, titled "Synergistic Compositions and Methods for Treating and Preventing Viral and Bacterial Infections," offers a promising intellectual property (IP) asset in the expanding landscape of antimicrobial therapeutics. This patent primarily focuses on novel combinations and methods that enhance efficacy against viral and bacterial pathogens, potentially addressing growing concerns over antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and emerging infectious diseases. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and the current landscape of similar IP rights within Australia and the global context.


Patent Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Overview of the Patent’s Scope

AU2016244279 claims are centered around combinatorial therapeutic compositions with synergistic effects against infectious agents. The scope extends to:

  • Chemical combinations involving at least two active ingredients, which may include known antivirals or antibacterials, formulated to achieve synergistic effects.
  • Methodologies for administering these combinations to treat, prevent, or reduce severity of infections caused by viruses and bacteria.
  • Specific formulations and delivery methods enhancing bioavailability or targeted delivery.
  • Optional adjunct components, such as immune modulators, to boost overall therapeutic efficacy.

The patent balances broad claims that cover general combinations with narrower claims that specify particular ingredients and methods, providing a strategic IP position.

2. Key Claims Breakdown

The claims—fundamental to patent enforceability—are structured to protect both the compositions and their application methods. Major claim categories include:

  • Composition Claims:

    • Compositions comprising a first active agent (e.g., an antiviral compound) and a second active agent (e.g., an antibiotic or immunomodulator), where the combination exhibits synergistic activity.
    • Specific ratios or dosages that optimize synergism.
    • Formulations in various pharmaceutical forms (e.g., capsules, injections, topical).
  • Method Claims:

    • Methods for treating or preventing infections via administration of the claimed compositions.
    • Protocols involving dosing regimens optimized for synergy.
    • Use of the compositions in specific patient populations or disease states.
  • Delivery and Formulation Claims:

    • Novel delivery systems that enhance stability or bioavailability.
    • Targeted delivery to specific tissues or cells.

Claim breadth:
The patent employs multiple dependent claims that narrow or specify the scope, aligning with strategic patents that aim to secure broad protection while maintaining enforceability.

Scope implications:
The scope encompasses combinations with known agents, provided the claimed synergism or method of use is demonstrated, aiding in defending against challenges based on prior art.


Patent Landscape Analysis in Australia

1. Domestic Patent Environment

Australia’s patent system under the Patent Act 1990 (Cth) is aligned with the global harmonization efforts, notably TRIPS compliance. Key points include:

  • Innovation emphasis on pharmaceutical combinations and methods for infectious diseases.
  • The Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and utility, especially for pharmaceuticals.

2. Existing Patent Rights and Similar Patents

a. Patent filings from major pharmaceutical companies:

  • Australian patents for antiviral and antibacterial combinations exist, notably from large entities such as Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Pfizer.
  • These often cover specific combinations (e.g., HIV drugs, hepatitis therapeutics) with jurisdictional patents aligned with clinical data.

b. Patent applications related to synergistic antimicrobial compositions:

  • Several applications focus on combination therapies for resistant infections, but many are narrower in scope—geared towards specific pathogens or active ingredients.
  • The unique aspect of AU2016244279 appears to be the broad coverage of combinations across viral and bacterial infections, with claims encompassing a wide range of active agents and formulations.

c. Patent challenges and freedom-to-operate considerations:

  • Given the proliferation of antimicrobial combination IPs, assessing freedom to operate requires detailed mapping of existing patents, especially those referencing similar compositions or methods in Australia.

3. International Patent Landscape

  • The patent landscape extends globally, with patents filed in the US, Europe, and Asia covering similar composite formulations and treatment methods.
  • The Key regions for potential infringement or licensing considerations include the US (with its extensive biotech patenting environment), Europe, and China.
  • Notably, the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings related to synergistic antimicrobial compositions often cite prior art similar to AU2016244279, indicating ongoing patent applications with comparable claims.

4. Patent Trends and Outlook

  • An increase in patent filings for combination therapeutics targeting resistant pathogens reflects industry focus on overcoming AMR.
  • The trend toward broad claims and multifunctional compositions underscores the strategic importance of such IP.
  • The Australian patent system’s openness to new formulations and methods supports continued innovation in this sector, though careful patent drafting is essential to withstand validity challenges.

Implications of the Patent Scope and Landscape

  • The broad claims in AU2016244279 position it as a valuable asset for companies developing next-generation antimicrobial therapies.
  • The patent’s coverage aligns well with global trends emphasizing synergistic combinations to address drug resistance.
  • However, the crowded patent landscape necessitates vigorous invalidity assessments and freedom-to-operate analyses for commercial deployment.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent protects broadly defined compositions combining active agents for antimicrobial use, along with specific formulations and methods, intending to prevent and treat infections with synergistic effects.
  • Strategic Positioning: Its broad claims offer significant IP leverage in Australia and potentially in other jurisdictions through national or international filings.
  • Landscape Context: The Australian patent environment is highly active in antimicrobial combination patents; AU2016244279 situates itself as a key player within this competitive landscape.
  • R&D and Commercialization: Companies should evaluate existing patents thoroughly before developing similar therapies, leveraging this patent’s broad scope where applicable.
  • Legal and Market Risks: Patent challenges and prior art considerations remain critical; ongoing monitoring of patent publications is recommended.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by AU2016244279?

The patent protects a broad spectrum of synergistic compositions and methods involving combinations of active agents targeting viral and bacterial infections, with specific formulations and delivery methods designed to enhance efficacy.

2. How does this patent compare with other antimicrobial patents in Australia?

While many Australian patents focus on specific drug combinations or pathogen-targeted therapies, AU2016244279 stands out for its broad scope covering multiple agents and infection types, providing wide-ranging protection.

3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?

Yes. Given the crowded patent landscape of antimicrobial combinations, prior art relating to similar compositions or methods could be a basis for validity challenges, especially if specific claims lack novelty or inventive step.

4. What are the key considerations for licensing or patenting similar compositions in Australia?

It’s vital to conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses, ensure novel aspects are clearly delineated, and draft claims that balance breadth with valid scope to avoid infringement and challenges.

5. How does the global patent landscape influence Australian patent strategy?

Global filings often signal the commercial importance and potential infringement risks, making aligned jurisdictional patent protections essential for multinational commercialization strategies.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2016244279, "Synergistic Compositions and Methods for Treating and Preventing Viral and Bacterial Infections".
  2. IP Australia. Patent examination guidelines and global patent landscape reports on antimicrobial combination therapies.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports on antimicrobial innovation, 2022.
  4. Global Data: Patentscope and Espacenet for international patent family analysis.
  5. Legal analysis: Patent invalidity and freedom-to-operate considerations in Australian patent law literature.

This analysis provides a strategic overview of AU2016244279, supporting informed decision-making regarding patent protection, R&D pathways, and market positioning within Australia’s competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.