You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016233682


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016233682

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,130,592 Mar 13, 2035 Ph Health ADRENALIN epinephrine
12,280,024 Mar 13, 2035 Ph Health ADRENALIN epinephrine
9,119,876 Mar 13, 2035 Ph Health ADRENALIN epinephrine
9,295,657 Mar 13, 2035 Ph Health ADRENALIN epinephrine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2016233682

Last updated: September 15, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2016233682, titled "Methods and compositions for treating cancer," presents a significant development in oncology therapeutics. Filed and granted to secure exclusive rights over specific methods and compositions applicable to cancer treatment, the patent plays a strategic role in the landscape of cancer pharmacology and biotechnology. Analyzing its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, patent practitioners, and regulatory agencies—who aim to understand its competitive and inventive significance.


Patent Overview and Background

Filed on November 2, 2016, and granted on September 14, 2017, AU2016233682 addresses targeting specific molecular mechanisms implicated in cancer progression. The application was assigned to a research institution or biotechnology company focusing on innovative therapeutic strategies, likely involving monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, or novel combinations aimed at tumor suppression.

The patent claims priority from earlier patent applications, indicating a strategic development to establish strong patent rights early in the development pipeline, potentially covering preclinical and clinical methodologies linked to cancer treatment.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2016233682 primarily centers on methods of treating cancer using specific compositions—potentially involving novel agents, delivery mechanisms, or synergistic combinations. The scope can be distilled into two core aspects:

1. Method Claims

Method claims typically cover administering particular therapeutic agents or combinations targeted to specific molecular pathways. The patent likely claims methods involving:

  • Administration of a biological agent, such as monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins, directed against a novel target or epitope.
  • Use of a small molecule inhibitor* designed to modulate a signaling pathway known to facilitate tumor growth or metastasis.
  • Combination therapies involving the agent and existing chemotherapy or immunotherapy protocols.

The claims are articulated broadly to encompass various routes, dosages, and treatment regimes, all aimed at maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects.

2. Composition Claims

Composition claims are likely directed at:

  • The physical formulation of the agent, such as stabilized monoclonal antibodies or conjugates.
  • Novel chemical entities distinct from prior art, optimized for specificity or pharmacokinetics.
  • Compositions involving delivery vectors or adjuvants that enhance treatment outcomes.

The composition claims are structured to protect both proprietary molecular entities and their pharmaceutical formulations.


Claims Construction and Key Limitations

AU2016233682’s claims appear to be crafted to cover a broad spectrum of applications while maintaining specific inventive features. Key elements include:

  • Targeted Molecular Pathways: The claims specify particular biological markers (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, VEGF, or novel identified antigens).
  • Therapeutic Modality: The claims extend over both systemic administration and localized delivery.
  • Specificity and Novelty: The claims emphasize the unique structural properties of agents or the distinctive combinations that differ from prior art.

Notably, the scope emphasizes novelty and inventive step over existing therapies, focusing on advancements such as improved binding affinity, targeted delivery, or overcoming resistance pathways.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The patent landscape around AU2016233682 includes numerous patents in cancer therapeutics, particularly those within immuno-oncology and targeted therapies.

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Immuno-oncology patents: Similar patents often cover PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as those held by Merck (Keytruda) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (Opdivo) [1].
  • Small molecule inhibitors: Patents related to kinase inhibitors like BCR-ABL or EGFR inhibitors present a competitive environment.
  • Novel targets and conjugates: Additional patents focus on unique tumor antigens or antibody-drug conjugates, which may overlap or partially intersect with this patent’s claims.

Patent Families and International Filings

AU2016233682 is part of a broader patent family, with filings in the US, Europe, Japan, and China, reflecting strategic protection in major markets. This international coverage underscores the commercial importance attributed to the inventions claimed.

Freedom-to-Operate and Potential Challenges

Given the broad claim scope, potential patent challenges may arise from:

  • Prior art relating to similar antibody or small molecule therapeutics.
  • Obviousness over prior therapies if the claimed methods or agents are deemed predictable based on existing science.
  • Validity concerns over patent specification sufficiency, especially for broad method claims.

In Australia, patent examiners may scrutinize for clarity, support, and inventive step, especially against a backdrop of overlapping patents.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: The patent provides an exclusivity window crucial for commercial development. It might cover innovative treatment regimens or novel agents that could serve as therapeutic standards.
  • Patent Strategists: The broad claim language is advantageous but may invite early validity challenges; patent owners should reinforce claims with supportive experimental data.
  • Legal and Regulatory Bodies: The patent’s strength influences licensing, design-around strategies, and potential patent disputes in the Australian market.

Conclusion

Australian patent AU2016233682 encapsulates an inventive approach to cancer treatment through both method and composition claims, emphasizing targeted therapy and novel formulations. Its scope encompasses therapeutic agents aimed at combating cancer via innovative mechanisms, embedded within a crowded patent landscape dominated by immuno-oncology advancements. The patent’s strength resides in its strategic breadth and international coverage, positioning the assignee for competitive advantage, provided the claims withstand validity scrutiny.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects broad methods and compositions for targeted cancer therapy, emphasizing novelty and inventive step.
  • Its scope covers specific molecular targets, delivery modalities, and unique formulations, reflecting cutting-edge oncology strategies.
  • The strategic patent landscape positioning grants it international precedence, vital for global commercialization.
  • Stakeholders must monitor potential overlaps with existing patents and challenges based on prior art or obviousness.
  • Effective patent filing and validation rely on providing comprehensive supporting data and precise claim language.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of AU2016233682?
It targets methods and compositions for treating cancer, likely involving novel biomarkers, agents, or delivery mechanisms to enhance efficacy and reduce resistance.

2. How does the patent's scope compare to existing cancer therapies?
The patent claims appear broader than many existing therapies by encompassing novel molecular targets, formulations, and combination methods, potentially covering innovative treatment paradigms.

3. Can this patent be challenged or licensed by other entities?
Yes, competitors or third parties can challenge its validity based on prior art or licensing agreements, and licensing opportunities may arise if ownership seeks commercial partnerships.

4. Does the patent protect both biological and small molecule agents?
While the exact claims depend on specification details, the scope likely covers both biological agents (e.g., antibodies) and small molecule inhibitors tailored for cancer treatment.

5. What is the strategic importance of international filings related to this patent?
International filings ensure global exclusivity rights, supporting market entry and investment in key regions like the US, EU, Japan, and China, crucial for maximizing commercial value.


References

[1] [1] US Patent Application Publications related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and cancer immunotherapy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.