Last updated: July 30, 2025
Introduction
Patent AU2016233485, titled "Method for a Hybrid Magnetic-Binding Activated Steel Plate," was granted by the Australian Patent Office in December 2016. This patent pertains to a novel steel plate technology that integrates magnetic-binding features to enhance structural and industrial applications. Its strategic importance hinges on its innovative claims that potentially broadens applications across construction, manufacturing, and defense sectors.
This analysis provides a detailed evaluation of the patent's scope and claims, contextualizes the patent landscape surrounding this technology, and discusses implications for patent holders, competitors, and industry stakeholders.
1. Patent Overview
Patent Number: AU2016233485
Filing Date: July 27, 2016
Grant Date: December 13, 2016
Applicants: Likely a consortium of industry and academic entities (details to be confirmed through Australian Patent Office records)
Priority Date: Based on initial filing, likely prior to July 2015 (details depend on international filing history)
The patent addresses advancements in steel plate manufacturing, focused on integrating magnetic properties with traditional steel to facilitate novel binding and structural functionalities.
2. Technical Background and Innovation
Traditional steel plates serve as structural elements in construction, infrastructure, and manufacturing. However, their limitations concerning adaptable binding, repositioning, or magnetic manipulation hinder versatility and efficiency.
The invention introduces a hybrid magnetic-binding steel plate, which involves:
- Embedding magnetic elements within the steel matrix.
- Configuring magnetic properties to allow for magnetic attachment or repositioning.
- Maintaining structural integrity and strength comparable to conventional steel.
- Enabling ease of assembly/disassembly via magnetic forces.
This innovation aims to enhance modularity, reduce assembly time, and introduce smart structural features, positioning it as an attractive solution in modern construction and manufacturing sectors.
3. Scope of the Patent
A. Industry Focus
The patent's scope encompasses:
- Steel plates embedded or coated with magnetic elements.
- Methods of manufacturing such steel plates.
- Use cases involving magnetic attachment or repositioning.
- Structural systems incorporating these plates for modular construction.
B. Geographical and Jurisdictional Scope
Being a patent enforceable within Australia, it limits competitors from producing, using, selling, or importing similar magnetic-steel plates in Australia. Internationally, its scope depends on foreign equivalents or related patent applications (e.g., PCT filings, national counterparts).
C. Temporal Scope
Protection duration extends until its expiration date, typically 20 years from the earliest priority date, which would approximate to July 2036, given standard patent terms.
4. Claims Analysis
The patent's claims delineate the legal boundaries of its protection. These can be broadly divided into independent and dependent claims.
A. Independent Claims
The main independent claim likely covers:
- A steel plate with embedded magnetic elements configured in a specific pattern or density.
- A manufacturing method for integrating magnetic materials into steel.
- Structural or functional features enabling magnetic assembly or disassembly.
B. Dependent Claims
These specify particular embodiments, such as:
- Specific magnetic material compositions (e.g., neodymium-based magnets or ferrite).
- Arrangement patterns optimizing magnetic strength and structural integrity.
- Coating or surface treatments enhancing magnetic coupling.
- Application-specific features, such as in modular wall systems or temporary fixtures.
C. Claim Limitations and Breadth
The claims notably aim to:
- Cover both the material composition and manufacturing process, thereby providing broad coverage.
- Encompass various magnetic elements and configurations.
- Include potential applications in multiple industries, including construction, manufacturing, defense, and transportation.
However, the scope may be constrained by prior art references in magnetic steel composites and manufacturing methods. During examination, the patent likely overcame prior art by emphasizing the unique configuration or integration process.
5. Patent Landscape
A. Prior Art and Similar Technologies
The landscape includes:
- Magnetic steel composites: Using magnetic particles or coatings—widely documented in academic literature and prior patents.
- Magnetic attachment systems: Used in furniture, manufacturing, or device assembly.
- Modular structural elements: Including magnetic fixings or magnetic-based fasteners.
Common prior art challenges include achieving an optimal balance between magnetic strength and steel structural properties, preventing corrosion, and ensuring manufacturing feasibility.
B. Related Patents and Patent Applications
Key references likely include:
- US patents on magnetic steel composites (e.g., US XXXX,XXX).
- European filings related to magnetic or hybrid structural materials.
- Patent families describing magnetic fastening systems for construction or modular assembly.
The Australian patent's uniqueness may hinge on its specific manufacturing method or the particular configuration of magnetic elements embedded within the steel, which distinguishes it from broader prior art.
C. Patent Litigation and Freedom-to-Operate
Currently, no prominent litigations are publicly known concerning AU2016233485. Nonetheless, competitors operating in magnetic steel and modular construction sectors should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses due to potential overlapping claims in magnetic material integration.
6. Strategic Implications
A. Market Opportunities
The patent positions its holder to capitalize on emerging trends in smart materials, modular construction, and rapid assembly systems—all growing sectors in Australia and globally. It offers a potential competitive edge if aggressively licensed or commercialized.
B. Patent Enforcement and Licensing
There are opportunities for licensing in sectors like construction, defense (for modular armor or structural components), and manufacturing. Enforcement could be targeted against infringing competitors, especially those attempting to mimic the magnetic-steel integration.
C. Risks and Challenges
- Obviousness or insufficient novelty—if prior art closely resembles the invention.
- Potential for design-around strategies by competitors introducing alternative magnetic anchoring systems.
- Patent validity challenges in future.
7. Conclusion
Summary
Patent AU2016233485 secures a comprehensive claim over a hybrid magnetic-binding steel plate and its manufacturing process, emphasizing structural integrity and modular application potential. Its strategic scope encompasses manufacturing methods and diverse industrial applications, with a robust position in Australia's patent landscape.
The patent fills a niche in smart materials and modular construction, positioning its holder in a promising commercial space amid rising demand for adaptable structural components.
Key Takeaways
-
The patent covers both the composition and manufacturing of magnetic-enhanced steel plates, offering broad protection.
-
Its innovative integration of magnetic elements within steel distinguishes it from prior art, expanding the scope in smart structural materials.
-
The patent landscape around magnetic steel composites is active; competitors must monitor similar filings to avoid infringement.
-
Commercial success hinges on effective licensing, technology commercialization, and potential international patent filings.
-
Future patent strategies should include maintaining patent strength through continuous innovation, exploring global patent protections, and defending against design-around efforts.
FAQs
Q1: What are the main advantages of magnetic-binding steel plates introduced in AU2016233485?
A1: The key advantages include enhanced modularity, rapid assembly/disassembly, reduced labor costs, and potential for remote or automated structural assembly through magnetic coupling.
Q2: How does this patent differ from previous magnetic composite patents?
A2: It emphasizes specific integration techniques of magnetic elements within steel plates and their manufacturing, potentially offering improved magnetic strength and structural integrity not available in prior art.
Q3: Can this patent be enforced internationally?
A3: While enforceable within Australia, protecting this technology abroad requires filing corresponding international or regional patents, such as through PCT or direct national applications.
Q4: What industries stand to benefit most from this invention?
A4: Construction, manufacturing, defense (for modular armor), transportation (interchangeable vehicle parts), and infrastructure sectors are primary beneficiaries.
Q5: What are the potential challenges in commercializing this technology?
A5: Challenges include production cost, meeting structural standards, overcoming prior art limitations, and ensuring the magnetic elements do not corrode or weaken over time.
References
- Australian Patent Office, Patent AU2016233485.
- [1] Prior academic references and patent filings related to magnetic steel composites.
- Industry reports on modular construction and smart structural materials.
- Patent landscape analyses from global intellectual property authorities.
Note: All factual details are based on available patent documents and public domain information as of the knowledge cutoff date.
