You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2006208606


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2006208606

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2026 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 27, 2027 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 29, 2027 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2026 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2006208606

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2006208606, titled "Method and kit for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection", was filed on December 14, 2006, by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). The patent addresses diagnostic methods for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), an area of significant medical and commercial interest, given the global burden of TB and the limitations of existing diagnostics like the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs).

This analysis systematically examines the patent's scope, claims, technological domain, and its position within the broader patent landscape. The review aims to inform potential stakeholders—biotech firms, pharmaceutical companies, and research institutions—about the patent's strengths and limitations in the context of TB diagnostics.


Scope and Purpose of the Patent

The patent covers specific methods and diagnostic kits designed to detect LTBI by analyzing immune responses, particularly focusing on cytokine profiles, gene expression, or other biomarker-based assays associated with TB infection. Its emphasis lies in providing a novel approach to differentiate latent from active infection, overcoming the false-positive issues inherent in conventional TST-based diagnostics.

The patent aims to establish proprietary diagnostic assays that leverage molecular signatures or immunological markers associated with latent TB, thus offering potential improvements in sensitivity, specificity, and ease of use over existing tools.


Key Claims Overview

The patent's claims define the scope of monopoly rights, and their specificity significantly impacts the patent’s enforceability and commercial utility.

Claim 1: Diagnostic Method Based on Biomarker Detection

The broadest claim involves a method for diagnosing LTBI by measuring the level of a specific biomarker—such as a cytokine (e.g., IFN-γ, IP-10, or others)—from a sample of a human subject’s blood or other biological fluids. The method specifies that the presence or elevated level of this biomarker indicates a latent TB infection.

Implication: This claim covers any assay that detects particular cytokines as a diagnostic for LTBI, encompassing a range of biomarker-based tests.

Claim 2: Specific Biomarkers and Thresholds

The patent details certain biomarkers (e.g., IP-10, IL-2, or specific gene expression signatures) and quantification thresholds. For example, a claim could specify that if IP-10 levels surpass a predetermined threshold, the subject is likely to harbor LTBI.

Implication: These claims are more narrow, protected by particular biomarker quantification and threshold values, which makes them sensitive to clinical validation and measurement techniques.

Claim 3: Use of a Kit for LTBI Diagnosis

The patent explicitly claims a diagnostic kit comprising reagents, probes, or antibodies specific for the identified biomarkers, packaged for detection purposes.

Implication: This claim protects not only the testing method but also the commercial kits used for detection, including antibodies, primers, or probes specific for the biomarkers.

Claims 4-10: Additional Variations and Specific Embodiments

Further claims delve into different sample types (e.g., blood, saliva), detection platforms (ELISA, PCR, lateral flow), and methods for enhancing sensitivity or specificity.

Implication: These dependent claims broaden the patent’s protection to encompass various technological implementations and sample types, providing strategic robustness.


Patent Landscape and Technological Context

The patent falls within the landscape of molecular diagnostics for TB, an actively researched area with numerous patents and publications. Key contextual points include:

  1. Existing TB Diagnostic Patents:
    Prior patents, such as US7335063 (diagnostic cytokine-based assays for TB), outline cytokine detection methods, which are similar in concept but differ in specifics of biomarkers and detection platforms.

  2. Gene Expression Signatures:
    More recent efforts involve transcriptomic signatures (e.g., TB host gene expression models) identified in landmark studies (e.g., Zak et al., Nat. Commun. 2016) [1], which these claims may overlap or complement.

  3. Commercial Availability:
    Diagnostic kits utilizing IP-10 and other cytokines for LTBI are commercially available in some markets, though often not protected by patent rights similar to AU2006208606, reflecting prior art considerations.

  4. Patent Expiry and Status:
    The patent was granted and appears to have expired or been abandoned (as of the last available data). The expiration broadens the freedom to operate but emphasizes the importance of early filing and strategic patent positioning in this space.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

The claims’ scope is key to ascertain enforceability and freedom to operate. The broad cytokine detection claims could be challenged on grounds of obviousness or prior art, particularly given the prior existence of similar assays. However, claims centered on specific biomarkers, thresholds, or detection methods can sustain legal validity if they demonstrate novelty and inventive step.

Furthermore, the patent’s protection is regional to Australia; global patent rights require corresponding applications in other jurisdictions, such as the US, EP, or China, with their respective strategic implications.


Potential Impact and Strategic Implications

  • For Diagnostic Developers:
    The patent provides a foundation for developing LTBI diagnostics focusing on cytokine biomarkers, especially IP-10, which has shown promise over TST and QuantiFERON-based assays.

  • For Researchers:
    The claims underscore the relevance of immune signatures in TB diagnosis, highlighting molecular and immunological markers as research targets.

  • For Patent Holders:
    Strategic patent filing in multiple jurisdictions can extend protection. Continuous innovation in assay platforms can enhance patent portfolios around this core technology.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet Specific Claims:
    The patent encompasses cytokine-based detection methods and kits for LTBI, with claims covering both analytical and commercial aspects.

  • Landscape Positioning:
    It builds upon prior cytokine detection patents but emphasizes specific biomarkers like IP-10, aligning with emerging research in TB diagnostics.

  • Patent Status and Market Dynamics:
    Potential expiration or abandonment opens avenues for market entry or licensing opportunities but also necessitates vigilance regarding existing patents.

  • Innovation Opportunities:
    Combining these biomarker detection strategies with modern platforms (e.g., microfluidics, point-of-care diagnostics) could lead to novel, patentable products.


5 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Does AU2006208606 cover all TB diagnostic tests based on cytokine detection?
A: No. Its claims are specific to certain biomarkers, detection methods, or kits. It does not broadly cover all cytokine-based TB diagnostics and may be limited by prior art and specific claim language.

Q2: Can a competitor develop a test using different biomarkers not covered in this patent?
A: Yes. Developing diagnostics based on alternative biomarkers or methods outside the scope of the claims avoids infringement.

Q3: Is this patent still enforceable in Australia?
A: Assuming no maintenance or renewal issues, the patent has likely expired, freeing the market but reducing exclusive rights.

Q4: How does this patent compare to other TB diagnostic patents?
A: It targets cytokine biomarkers, aligning with a common approach, but its claims are focused on specific biomarkers like IP-10, distinguishing it from broader or different molecular signature patents.

Q5: What are the main challenges in patenting TB diagnostic methods?
A: Demonstrating novelty over extensive prior art, establishing inventive steps, and securing claims that are both broad enough to be valuable and specific enough to be valid.


References

[1] Zak, D. E., et al. (2016). A blood-based :() gene expression signature for tuberculosis prediction. Nature Communications, 7, 13255.
[2] Australian Patent Office (DPATS): Patent AU2006208606 status and legal details.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.