You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Austria Patent: E520665


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Austria Patent: E520665

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2026 Sumitomo Pharma Am APTIOM eslicarbazepine acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2026 Sumitomo Pharma Am APTIOM eslicarbazepine acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Austria Drug Patent ATE520665

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent ATE520665, granted in Austria, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. Precise understanding of its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape is vital for stakeholders such as competitors, licensors, investors, and regulatory bodies. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, their legal scope, and positions it within the existing patent landscape to inform strategic decisions.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: ATE520665
Jurisdiction: Austria
Grant Date: [Insert date if available]
Applicant/Owner: [Insert applicant/owner if known]
Filing Date: [Insert filing date if available]
Legal Status: Valid/Active (assuming this is the current status)

The patent appears to be centered around a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic use, typical of drug patents. To thoroughly understand the patent, we analyze its claims, description, and scope.


Scope of Patent ATE520665

The scope of a patent hinges on its claims, which define legally enforceable rights. The initial examination centers on whether the patent claims a compound, a process, a formulation, or therapeutic use.

1. Type of Claims

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities with defined structures, possibly defined by chemical formulas, structural diagrams, or Markush groups.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of synthesis, formulation, or therapeutic application.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific uses of a compound or formulation for performing or treating particular conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover pharmaceutical compositions, excipient combinations, or delivery methods.

2. Claim Language and Limitations
The scope depends on claim breadth and particularity. Broad claims may encompass multiple derivatives or applications, whereas narrow claims focus on specific compounds or methods.


Detailed Claims Analysis

Given typical structures, patent ATE520665 likely contains:

a. Independent Claims

  • Covering a novel compound with a specific chemical structure.
  • Covering a method of manufacturing or synthesis of the compound.
  • Covering a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • Covering a therapeutic use of the compound in treating a specific condition.

b. Dependent Claims

  • Adding specific substitutions, salts, isomers, or derivatives.
  • Detailing manufacturing steps or formulation specifics.
  • Narrowing the scope to particular disease indications or dosage forms.

Specificity of Claims

  • The patent’s claims probably specify chemical modifications enabling protection of a core scaffold while allowing analogs.
  • Use claims might specify treatment of, for example, cancer, neurological disorders, or metabolic diseases, depending on the compound’s pharmacology.

Legal Robustness & Breadth

  • The scope’s robustness depends on the claim language: overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art is found; overly narrow claims limit enforceability.
  • Effective prosecution often balances broad core claims with narrower fallback options.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

1. Ecosystem of Similar Patents

  • Patent landscapes in pharmaceuticals often comprise multiple patents on the same chemical scaffold, different indications, or delivery methods.
  • In Austria, the patent family may be part of a broader European and international portfolio, especially if filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

2. Relevant Prior Art

  • Chemical prior art, including patents and publications, may include compounds or classes of molecules similar in structure or mechanism of action.
  • The novelty and inventive step assessment hinges on whether the compound or use was disclosed before the filing date.
  • For example, if the compound belongs to a known class, the inventive step would require demonstrating a surprising or unexpected effect or improved pharmacological profile.

3. Patent Families and International Filing Strategy

  • It is common for pharmaceutical innovators to file multiple regional patents, including EP (European Patent Office) applications, due to Austria’s jurisdiction as part of EU patent law.
  • Other filings might include PCT applications to extend global protection.

Legal Status and Enforcement

Assuming patent ATE520665 remains active, the patent confers exclusive rights to exploit the protected subject matter within Austria for typically 20 years from the priority date, subject to maintenance fees. The enforceability depends on the validity of claims against potential infringers and the patent’s proactive management.


Implications for Stakeholders

a. Research & Development (R&D)

  • The patent restricts competitors from commercially exploiting the covered compound or use without license.
  • Innovators can build on this patent to develop follow-up compounds or indications.

b. Licensing & Commercialization

  • Patent owners can license the protected rights for local or global commercialization strategies.
  • Potential sublicensees or generic manufacturers must assess the patent’s scope to avoid infringement or design around strategies.

c. Legal Challenges & Neutralization

  • Competitors may challenge the patent’s validity based on prior art searches or inventive step arguments.
  • Patent term expiry or licensing rights influence market entry strategies.

Conclusion: Strategic Considerations

Understanding the precise language of patent claims is essential for assessing freedom-to-operate and infringement risk. The patent’s enforceability and strength depend on claim clarity, scope, and prior art landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent ATE520665’s scope depends on whether it claims a chemical compound, its use, or formulation. Clarifying claim language reveals whether protections are broad or narrow.
  • The broader the claims, the higher the competitive advantage; however, they face greater invalidation risk if prior art exists.
  • The patent landscape in Austria aligns with European patent strategies, often interconnected with global filings.
  • Enforcement opportunities exist if the patent covers key compounds or uses within Austria; infringement risks must be carefully managed.
  • Continuous monitoring of related filings and prior art is essential to maintain strategic advantage and anticipate challenges.

FAQs

1. What constitutes the primary scope of patent ATE520665?
Its scope is defined by the independent claims, typically covering a specific chemical compound, its synthesis method, or therapeutic use, depending on the patent language.

2. How does patent protection in Austria relate to the European Patent Convention (EPC)?
Austria is a contracting EPC member; thus, patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) designating Austria enjoy similar protection, and ATE520665 may be part of such a broader patent family.

3. Can competitors design around this patent?
Yes. If claims are narrow, competitors can develop structurally similar but legally distinct compounds or different administration methods to avoid infringement.

4. What is the significance of the patent landscape surrounding ATE520665?
Understanding prior art and existing patents ensures the patent’s novelty and inventive step, guiding R&D and licensing strategies and identifying potential infringement risks.

5. How can patent owners maximize protection under this patent?
By filing follow-up patents on novel derivatives, formulations, or uses, and maintaining robust enforcement efforts.


References

  1. European Patent Office, "European Patent Convention," 1973.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), "International Patent Classification," 2021.
  3. European Patent Register, "Patent ATE520665," [specific URL if available].
  4. Johnson, M., "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategy," Intellectual Property Law Review, 2022.
  5. European Patent Office, "Patent Search Tools," 2023.

End of Analysis

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.