Last Updated: September 23, 2026

Terazosin hydrochloride - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for terazosin hydrochloride and what is the scope of patent protection?

Terazosin hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in three branded drugs marketed by Abbott, Ajanta Pharma Ltd, Bionpharma, Heritage Pharma Avet, Hikma, Jubilant Cadista, Pharmobedient, Ranbaxy Labs Ltd, Senores Pharms, Novitium Pharma, Chartwell Rx, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Sandoz, and Teva, and is included in sixteen NDAs. There are two patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Twenty-two suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for terazosin hydrochloride
US Patents:2
Tradenames:3
Applicants:14
NDAs:16
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 21
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 29
Patent Applications: 2,190
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in terazosin hydrochloride?terazosin hydrochloride excipients list
DailyMed Link:terazosin hydrochloride at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for terazosin hydrochloride

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Nandakumar NarayananPHASE1
University of IowaEARLY_PHASE1
Newcastle UniversityPHASE3

See all terazosin hydrochloride clinical trials

Pharmacology for terazosin hydrochloride

US Patents and Regulatory Information for terazosin hydrochloride

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Jubilant Cadista TERAZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE terazosin hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 075317-001 Dec 20, 2004 AB RX No Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva TERAZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE terazosin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 074446-003 May 18, 2000 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hikma TERAZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE terazosin hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 075498-004 Apr 12, 2001 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott HYTRIN terazosin hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 020347-002 Dec 14, 1994 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmobedient TERAZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE terazosin hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 075384-003 Dec 1, 2000 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for terazosin hydrochloride

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Abbott HYTRIN terazosin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 019057-004 Aug 7, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott HYTRIN terazosin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 019057-004 Aug 7, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott HYTRIN terazosin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 019057-002 Aug 7, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott HYTRIN terazosin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 019057-001 Aug 7, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott HYTRIN terazosin hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 020347-003 Dec 14, 1994 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Terazosin Hydrochloride Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: August 28, 2026

Terazosin hydrochloride is a mature, multisource generic alpha-1 adrenergic blocker used primarily for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and hypertension. Its commercial profile is defined by long-expired primary protection, multiple generic suppliers, low pricing, limited differentiation, and declining clinical preference relative to newer BPH therapies. Public companies do not generally report terazosin revenue separately, so molecule-level financial analysis relies on prescription volume, reimbursement data, supplier participation, and broader generic-drug segment disclosures.

What is the current FDA status of terazosin hydrochloride?

Terazosin hydrochloride is an FDA-approved small-molecule prescription drug available in capsule form. The reference product was Hytrin, originally developed and marketed by Abbott Laboratories. FDA labeling covers:

  • Treatment of symptomatic BPH
  • Treatment of hypertension
  • Oral capsule strengths commonly ranging from 1 mg to 10 mg

The drug is administered once daily after dose titration. The initial dose is typically 1 mg, with gradual increases used to limit first-dose hypotension and syncope risks. FDA labeling identifies orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, weakness and syncope as important safety considerations.[1]

Regulatory attribute Terazosin hydrochloride
Active ingredient Terazosin hydrochloride
Drug class Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist
Primary indications BPH and hypertension
Dosage form Immediate-release oral capsules
Reference brand Hytrin
Regulatory pathway for current products Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA
Biologic status Not applicable
Biosimilar exposure None
Current commercial status Mature generic market

Terazosin is not a biologic, so biosimilar substitution is not relevant. Competition comes from chemically equivalent generic products and therapeutic alternatives such as tamsulosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin, silodosin and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors.

When did terazosin lose exclusivity?

Terazosin lost meaningful market exclusivity decades ago. Its present market is not protected by a commercially relevant compound patent or regulatory exclusivity period.

The original Hytrin product was approved in the late 1980s. The principal commercial protection associated with the original product has expired, allowing multiple generic manufacturers to enter through the ANDA pathway. The drug is therefore in the late-stage generic lifecycle, with competition focused on manufacturing cost, supply reliability, pharmacy contracting and reimbursement access rather than patent differentiation.[2]

What patents protect terazosin hydrochloride?

No active composition-of-matter patent is generally understood to provide current commercial protection for terazosin hydrochloride in the United States. Any historical patents covering the active compound, pharmaceutical compositions or use of terazosin would have expired after the original development period.

The practical patent position is:

Patent category Current commercial relevance
Composition of matter Expired
Basic oral capsule formulation Expired or commercially immaterial
BPH method of use Expired or not a meaningful barrier
Hypertension method of use Expired or not a meaningful barrier
New chemical entity exclusivity Expired
Pediatric exclusivity Expired
Current Orange Book blocking patent No material barrier generally expected
Patent-based generic entry risk Low

The absence of an active blocking patent means a new ANDA applicant generally would not face the type of patent certification risk associated with protected branded products. Any current Paragraph IV filing would have limited strategic value unless directed at a newly listed formulation, manufacturing process or other narrow claim.

What is the Orange Book status of terazosin hydrochloride?

The Orange Book framework applies to the historical reference product and approved abbreviated applications, but it does not create continuing market protection for an old generic drug. Hytrin's historical regulatory listing identifies terazosin hydrochloride as the active ingredient and provides the reference product against which generic versions were approved.[2]

Current Orange Book analysis should distinguish between:

  1. The discontinued or commercially inactive reference brand.
  2. Approved generic terazosin hydrochloride ANDAs.
  3. Any historical patents or exclusivity entries associated with the original NDA.
  4. Current marketing status for individual generic applicants.

Generic approval does not guarantee continuous commercial supply. Manufacturers may retain FDA approval while discontinuing active marketing because of low margins, contract losses, manufacturing costs or supply-chain problems.

How many manufacturers supply terazosin hydrochloride?

The U.S. market has historically included multiple generic suppliers, including large generic manufacturers and contract manufacturers. Supplier participation has changed over time as companies have exited low-margin products or transferred product rights.

The relevant competitive structure is fragmented:

  • Large generic companies compete for wholesaler and pharmacy contracts.
  • Smaller manufacturers may enter when supply shortages create temporary pricing opportunities.
  • Private-label distributors can market products manufactured by another FDA-approved supplier.
  • Retail availability can vary by strength, package size and pharmacy chain.

The market is more concentrated at the distributor and pharmacy-benefit level than at the approval level. Several approved manufacturers may exist, while only a smaller number actively supply national accounts.

What formulations are protected by terazosin patents?

The commercially established formulation is an immediate-release oral capsule. There is no significant current formulation moat around the standard product. Differentiation opportunities would be limited to:

  • Modified-release delivery
  • Fixed-dose combinations
  • Alternative dosage forms
  • Improved titration or adherence systems
  • Specialty packaging

Any such product would need to demonstrate clinical, regulatory or commercial value against a low-cost generic capsule. A new formulation could obtain patent protection, but its market opportunity would be constrained by the low price of existing products and the availability of other alpha blockers.

How strong is the terazosin patent estate?

The terazosin patent estate is commercially weak because the relevant protection is historical and the molecule is fully genericized.

Patent-strength factor Assessment
Remaining composition protection None of practical significance
Remaining regulatory exclusivity None of practical significance
Formulation differentiation Limited
Method-of-use protection Not commercially meaningful
Patent litigation leverage Low
ANDA entry barrier Minimal
Freedom-to-operate risk for standard capsules Low, subject to product-specific review

The principal risks for a manufacturer are regulatory and operational rather than patent-based. These include FDA manufacturing compliance, product quality, pharmacovigilance, supply continuity and the ability to maintain competitive pricing.

What is the financial trajectory for terazosin hydrochloride?

Terazosin's financial trajectory follows the standard pattern for an old generic:

  1. High branded revenue during the Hytrin lifecycle.
  2. Rapid price erosion after generic entry.
  3. Volume retention in selected patients and institutional channels.
  4. Stable but low-value generic demand.
  5. Periodic price increases only when supplier exits or shortages reduce supply.

No major manufacturer generally reports terazosin hydrochloride revenue as a separate line item. Public filings usually aggregate the product within broad generic pharmaceutical or established-products categories. This prevents a reliable molecule-specific revenue estimate from public company reports.

What drives terazosin revenue?

Revenue is driven by prescription volume multiplied by realized net price. The main variables are:

  • Total BPH and hypertension treatment volume
  • Share retained by terazosin against newer alpha blockers
  • Generic supplier count
  • Medicaid and commercial reimbursement
  • Pharmacy benefit manager contracts
  • Wholesale acquisition price
  • Shortages or manufacturing interruptions
  • Prescription preference for once-daily low-cost treatment

The price environment is structurally unfavorable for suppliers. Terazosin has low development risk, but its mature status limits pricing power. Gross margins can remain acceptable for efficient manufacturers with established production lines, while smaller suppliers may struggle to justify ongoing commercialization.

How does terazosin compare with competing BPH drugs?

Terazosin competes mainly with tamsulosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin and silodosin. It also competes indirectly with finasteride and dutasteride, which treat BPH through a different mechanism.

Drug Class Generic status Typical market position
Terazosin Nonselective alpha-1 blocker Generic Low-cost, mature option
Tamsulosin Alpha-1A selective blocker Generic Stronger BPH preference and broad use
Alfuzosin Uroselective alpha blocker Generic Alternative for BPH
Doxazosin Nonselective alpha-1 blocker Generic Competes in BPH and hypertension
Silodosin Alpha-1A selective blocker Generic More targeted BPH option
Finasteride 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor Generic Used for enlarged prostate, often long-term
Dutasteride 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor Generic Used for prostate-volume reduction

Terazosin's disadvantages include orthostatic hypotension and the need for dose titration. Tamsulosin and other uroselective agents can be preferred for BPH because they may produce less systemic blood-pressure reduction. Terazosin retains utility where low acquisition cost, combined blood-pressure and urinary-symptom treatment, or existing patient response supports continued use.

What generic entry risks exist for terazosin?

For the incumbent supplier, generic entry risk is already realized rather than emerging. The commercial risks are:

  • Further price erosion from additional ANDA holders
  • Loss of preferred-pharmacy status
  • Supplier consolidation followed by aggressive bidding
  • FDA inspection or manufacturing disruptions
  • Shortage-driven substitution by other alpha blockers
  • Clinical migration to tamsulosin or other BPH therapies

For a new entrant, Paragraph IV litigation risk is low, but commercial entry risk is high. A new applicant would face an established generic market with limited brand loyalty and modest revenue per prescription. The investment case depends on manufacturing efficiency, reliable supply and a commercial channel that can support low-margin products.

Is there terazosin patent litigation or a settlement agreement?

No major current patent litigation or settlement structure is generally associated with standard terazosin hydrochloride capsules. The product's principal patent disputes, if any, would be historical and tied to the original branded product or early generic entry.

A new standard-capsule applicant would be more likely to encounter ordinary ANDA approval and commercial contracting issues than a branded patent settlement. No biosimilar litigation applies because terazosin is a small molecule.

Are there licensing deals involving terazosin hydrochloride?

The original branded product was associated with Abbott Laboratories. Current terazosin transactions are more likely to involve generic product rights, manufacturing arrangements, private-label supply and portfolio acquisitions than high-value discovery or licensing deals.

The economics do not support substantial upfront licensing payments for the active ingredient. Transaction value would depend on:

  • Approved ANDA status
  • Active commercial supply
  • Manufacturing site ownership
  • Customer contracts
  • Historical shortage performance
  • Geographic rights
  • Remaining product liability exposure

What geographic markets remain commercially relevant?

The United States remains commercially relevant because of its large generic prescription market and established reimbursement infrastructure. Europe, Canada and other regulated markets also have generic terazosin products, but market structures differ by country.

Region Commercial characteristics
United States ANDA-based competition, PBM contracting and low generic prices
European Union National reimbursement and tender systems
Canada Provincial formularies and pharmacy substitution
Emerging markets Variable regulatory enforcement and local manufacturing
Japan and other Asian markets Country-specific approval, pricing and distribution rules

Geographic expansion offers limited upside unless the supplier already has regulatory infrastructure and local distribution. The main barrier is not patent coverage but registration cost, pricing controls and fragmented market access.

What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers affect terazosin?

Manufacturing barriers are moderate. Terazosin is an established active pharmaceutical ingredient with a conventional oral dosage form, but suppliers must maintain:

  • Qualified API sourcing
  • Consistent impurity control
  • Content uniformity
  • Dissolution performance
  • Stability data
  • FDA-compliant manufacturing
  • Reliable packaging and distribution

The IP barrier is low. Manufacturing scale, quality systems and customer access determine competitiveness more than patents. API-source qualification can still create supply vulnerability if the market depends on a small number of approved suppliers.

Key Takeaways

  • Terazosin hydrochloride is a mature generic alpha-1 blocker with no meaningful remaining primary exclusivity.
  • The reference brand, Hytrin, was approved in the late 1980s and has long since lost commercial exclusivity.
  • Current competition is based on price, supply reliability, reimbursement and manufacturing efficiency.
  • Public companies generally do not disclose terazosin revenue separately.
  • Revenue has likely followed the standard mature-generic pattern: severe post-entry price erosion, persistent low-cost demand and limited growth.
  • Tamsulosin and other uroselective alpha blockers limit terazosin's growth in BPH.
  • There is no biosimilar risk because terazosin is a small molecule.
  • Patent litigation and settlement risk for standard terazosin capsules is low.
  • The main investment risks are market contraction, supplier exits, price competition and manufacturing disruption.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is terazosin hydrochloride still profitable to manufacture?

It can be profitable for an efficient supplier with low production costs and established pharmacy or institutional contracts. The product is unlikely to support premium pricing or substantial standalone investment.

Does terazosin hydrochloride have a new chemical entity patent?

No commercially relevant new chemical entity protection remains. The drug has been genericized for decades.

Can a company launch a new terazosin formulation?

Yes, subject to FDA requirements and any applicable product-specific patent review. Commercial success would require a meaningful adherence, safety or dosing advantage over inexpensive immediate-release capsules.

Is terazosin being replaced by tamsulosin?

Tamsulosin is preferred for many BPH patients because of its uroselective profile, but terazosin remains available for patients who respond to it or need an alpha blocker that also lowers blood pressure.

What is the main risk in acquiring a terazosin generic product?

The main risk is weak and declining economics. A buyer should focus on active market share, supplier concentration, net pricing, customer contracts, manufacturing cost and recent FDA compliance history rather than patent duration.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Terazosin hydrochloride prescribing information. DailyMed.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: Hytrin, NDA 019057.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Orange Book.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Abbreviated new drug application approvals and generic drug resources.
  5. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Terazosin hydrochloride drug label information. DailyMed.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.