You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Tafenoquine succinate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for tafenoquine succinate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Tafenoquine succinate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by 60 Degrees Pharms and Glaxosmithkline, and is included in two NDAs. There are three patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Tafenoquine succinate has nine patent family members in eight countries.

Two suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for tafenoquine succinate
International Patents:9
US Patents:3
Tradenames:2
Applicants:2
NDAs:2
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 2
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 44
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in tafenoquine succinate?tafenoquine succinate excipients list
DailyMed Link:tafenoquine succinate at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for tafenoquine succinate
Generic Entry Date for tafenoquine succinate*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
Dosage:
TABLET;ORAL

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for tafenoquine succinate

US Patents and Regulatory Information for tafenoquine succinate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
60 Degrees Pharms ARAKODA tafenoquine succinate TABLET;ORAL 210607-001 Aug 8, 2018 RX Yes Yes 11,744,828 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline KRINTAFEL tafenoquine succinate TABLET;ORAL 210795-001 Jul 20, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
60 Degrees Pharms ARAKODA tafenoquine succinate TABLET;ORAL 210607-001 Aug 8, 2018 RX Yes Yes 10,342,791 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Tafoquamine Succinate

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Tafoquamine succinate, a novel antimalarial agent, has garnered increasing attention within the pharmaceutical landscape. Its molecular design and therapeutic profile position it as a promising candidate in the fight against resistant malaria strains. As market dynamics evolve alongside regulatory and clinical developments, understanding its financial trajectory becomes crucial for stakeholders. This article presents a detailed analysis of the current market environment, competitive positioning, regulatory landscape, and potential revenue streams associated with tafoquamine succinate.


Pharmacological Profile and Clinical Development

Tafoquamine succinate derives from advanced research targeting resistant Plasmodium strains, particularly P. falciparum. It acts primarily through inhibition of core enzymatic pathways critical to parasite survival. Phase II clinical trials indicate promising efficacy and safety profiles, with ongoing Phase III studies assessing its potential as a first-line antimalarial.

The drug’s pharmacokinetic properties offer notable advantages: extended half-life, fewer dosing requirements, and minimal adverse effects, translating into improved patient adherence and treatment outcomes. These characteristics are instrumental in shaping its commercial prospects.


Market Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The global antimalarial market is projected to reach USD 2.2 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of approximately 4.5%[1]. Existing therapies include artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) and newer agents like tafenoquine and lumefantrine. However, increasing resistance—particularly in Southeast Asia—urgent need for novel drugs with superior efficacy and safety profiles.

Tafoquamine succinate’s positioning depends on multiple factors:

  • Advantages over existing therapies: Longer half-life, reduced dosing frequency, lower resistance risks.
  • Competitive differentiation: Its potential to combat resistant Plasmodium strains offers a significant edge.
  • Partnerships and licensing: Collaborations with global health organizations could accelerate market penetration.

Current pipeline assessments suggest it could capture a sizeable niche within the antimalarial sector, especially in endemic regions facing resistance challenges.


Regulatory Pathways and Market Entry Considerations

Regulatory approval is paramount for commercial success. The drug’s development plan aims for expedited review pathways, potentially through the FDA’s Priority Review Program or the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) PRIME scheme, given the unmet medical need.

Post-approval, market entry strategies will emphasize:

  • Pricing models: Balancing affordability for low-income endemic areas and recouping R&D investments.
  • Distribution channels: Collaborations with global health agencies, governments, and NGOs.
  • Intellectual property: Patent protections safeguard exclusivity, involving composition, formulation, and manufacturing processes.

Given the public health importance, partnerships with organizations like WHO could facilitate accelerated availability, impacting financial outcomes positively.


Financial Trajectory and Revenue Projections

Development Stage Investment
The development of tafoquamine succinate has accumulated R&D costs estimated at USD 200–300 million, covering laboratory research, clinical trials, and regulatory submissions (assuming ongoing phase III trials).

Market Penetration Scenarios

  • Optimistic scenario: Achieving a strategic partnership leading to widespread adoption in endemic countries, rapid approval, and high-market share.
  • Moderate scenario: Gradual adoption with incremental market capture due to competition and supply chain complexities.
  • Conservative scenario: Regulatory delays or inferior efficacy results dampen adoption, limiting revenues.

Revenue Projections
Under favorable conditions, it could generate USD 500–800 million annually within 5–7 years post-launch, driven by sales volume and pricing strategies. Margins will depend on manufacturing costs, licensing fees, and distribution expenses. With patent protections and strategic alliances, profitability could stabilize within 3 years of commercial launch.

Risk Factors

  • Patent challenges and possible generic competition post-exclusivity expiry.
  • Regulatory hurdles across different markets potentially delaying revenues.
  • Market acceptance influenced by existing therapies’ entrenched position and resistance patterns.
  • Funding constraints in endemic regions impacting drug accessibility and financial returns.

Market Opportunities and Challenges

Opportunities

  • Unmet medical needs: Resistance mitigation provides a significant market entry point.
  • Global health initiatives: Funding from agencies like GAVI, the Global Fund, and WHO.
  • Expansion into related indications: Prophylaxis or broader parasitic diseases.

Challenges

  • Pricing pressures and affordability issues in low-income settings.
  • Competitive threats from upcoming therapies with similar or superior profiles.
  • Supply chain complexities in endemic regions.

Strategic Recommendations

To maximize financial returns, stakeholders should:

  • Secure strategic partnerships for manufacturing, distribution, and marketing.
  • Invest in real-world evidence generation to substantiate efficacy and safety claims.
  • Engage with global health agencies early for endorsement and funding opportunities.
  • Plan for patent lifecycle management, including orphan drug designations if applicable.

Key Takeaways

  • Market potential is substantial but contingent upon successful clinical and regulatory milestones.
  • Resistance management and improved adherence position tafoquamine succinate favorably against existing therapies.
  • Partnerships and global health collaborations are critical for rapid market penetration and revenue generation.
  • Investment risks include regulatory delays, competition, and pricing pressures affecting long-term profitability.
  • Proactive IP protection and market access strategies will shape the financial trajectory.

FAQs

1. What differentiates tafoquamine succinate from other antimalarial drugs?
It offers extended half-life, higher efficacy against resistant strains, and fewer adverse effects, leading to simplified dosing and potentially better patient adherence.

2. What is the current regulatory status of tafoquamine succinate?
As of now, it is in Phase III clinical trials with expected submission for regulatory approval in the next 12–18 months, subject to successful trial outcomes.

3. Which markets will likely adopt tafoquamine succinate first?
Endemic regions in Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where resistance to current treatments is most pronounced, are primary targets.

4. How might patent protections influence its financial success?
Strong patent protections will ensure market exclusivity for 10–12 years, allowing recuperation of R&D investments and premium pricing. Patent challenges could pose risks, so strategic patenting is vital.

5. What are the main challenges to commercializing tafoquamine succinate?
Regulatory approvals, high development costs, resistance from existing therapies, pricing constraints, and supply chain hurdles in low-income regions remain key challenges.


Sources:
[1] Market Research Future, “Antimalarial Market Forecast,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.