You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 7, 2025

Rivastigmine tartrate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for rivastigmine tartrate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Rivastigmine tartrate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Novartis, Alembic Pharms Ltd, Apotex Inc, Aurobindo Pharma, Cadila Pharms Ltd, Chartwell Rx, Dr Reddys Labs Inc, Macleods Pharms Ltd, Orbion Pharms, Sun Pharm, and Watson Labs, and is included in twelve NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are fifteen drug master file entries for rivastigmine tartrate. Twelve suppliers are listed for this compound. There is one tentative approval for this compound.

Summary for rivastigmine tartrate
Drug Prices for rivastigmine tartrate

See drug prices for rivastigmine tartrate

Recent Clinical Trials for rivastigmine tartrate

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.Phase 1/Phase 2
Duke UniversityPhase 1/Phase 2
Taishoff Family FoundationPhase 1/Phase 2

See all rivastigmine tartrate clinical trials

Generic filers with tentative approvals for RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE
Applicant Application No. Strength Dosage Form
⤷  Get Started Free⤷  Get Started Free2MG/MLSOLUTION; ORAL

The 'tentative' approval signifies that the product meets all FDA standards for marketing, and, but for the patents / regulatory protections, it would approved.

Pharmacology for rivastigmine tartrate
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for rivastigmine tartrate
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
EXELON Oral Solution rivastigmine tartrate 2 mg/mL 021025 1 2004-11-05
EXELON Capsules rivastigmine tartrate 1.5 mg, 3 mg, 4.5 mg and 6 mg 020823 3 2004-04-21

US Patents and Regulatory Information for rivastigmine tartrate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Watson Labs RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 077129-004 Jan 8, 2008 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Alembic Pharms Ltd RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 091689-001 Jun 12, 2012 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Dr Reddys Labs Inc RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 077130-002 Oct 31, 2007 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Aurobindo Pharma RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 204572-003 Mar 25, 2016 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sun Pharm RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 077131-004 Oct 22, 2007 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for rivastigmine tartrate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Novartis EXELON rivastigmine tartrate SOLUTION;ORAL 021025-001 Apr 21, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis EXELON rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 020823-004 Apr 21, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis EXELON rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 020823-006 Apr 21, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis EXELON rivastigmine tartrate CAPSULE;ORAL 020823-003 Apr 21, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis EXELON rivastigmine tartrate SOLUTION;ORAL 021025-001 Apr 21, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for RIVASTIGMINE TARTRATE

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Rivastigmine tartrate, marketed under brands such as Exelon, is a cholinesterase inhibitor primarily prescribed for managing mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease dementia. As the global burden of neurodegenerative disorders escalates with aging populations, understanding the market dynamics and financial trajectory of rivastigmine tartrate offers critical insights for stakeholders spanning pharmaceutical companies, investors, healthcare policymakers, and healthcare providers.

Market Overview

Prevalence and Market Demand

The rising incidence of Alzheimer’s disease is a fundamental driver for rivastigmine tartrate. According to the World Alzheimer Report 2022, an estimated 55 million people worldwide suffer from dementia, with projections reaching 78 million by 2030. Parkinson’s disease dementia also contributes to the demand for cholinesterase inhibitors, as cognitive impairment becomes an increasingly recognized therapeutic target.

The aging global demographic underpins sustained demand, particularly in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia where healthcare infrastructure supports diagnosis and treatment. Market access and awareness influence prescription rates, with the drug prescribed primarily within neurology and geriatrics contexts.

Competitive Landscape and Market Share

Rivastigmine tartrate competes with other cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil and galantamine, as well as the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine. While rivastigmine’s unique transdermal patch formulation offers advantages in compliance by reducing gastrointestinal side effects, it remains under pressure from newer therapies and combination regimens seeking improved efficacy.

Major players include Novartis (original developer), Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. Patent expirations and the availability of generics have led to price erosion in certain markets but concurrently expanded access through cost-effective options.

Market Drivers and Restraints

Drivers

  • Aging Population: The demographic shift towards an older population is the primary driver, with increased prevalence translating into higher drug utilization.
  • Rising Awareness: Growing recognition of early diagnosis and treatment of cognitive disorders enhances prescribing rates.
  • Formulation Innovations: The advent of transdermal patches improves adherence and satisfaction, expanding the target patient population.

Restraints

  • Limited Efficacy: Rivastigmine provides symptomatic relief but does not alter disease progression, limiting its long-term value.
  • Side Effects and Safety Profile: Gastrointestinal disturbances, weight loss, and tremors impact tolerability.
  • Market Saturation and Generics: Price competition from generics diminishes revenue potential in mature markets.

Financial Trajectory: Revenue, Pricing, and Market Penetration

Revenue Generation and Trends

Initially launched in the late 1990s, rivastigmine tartrate swiftly captured market share in the dementia therapeutics space. With peak sales reaching over USD 1 billion globally (2010-2015), subsequent years saw a decline attributable to patent expiry and generic entry, especially in North America and Europe.

However, in emerging markets where patent protection lingers or is not enforced strongly, revenue streams remain robust. The global market for rivastigmine was valued at approximately USD 600 million in 2022, with projections indicating a CAGR of 2-4% through 2030, driven primarily by Asia-Pacific expansion.

Pricing Strategies and Market Penetration

Pricing varies significantly across regions. Developed markets typically price the drug higher, factoring in reimbursement frameworks, while price sensitivity in lower-income countries prompts the use of generics at a fraction of the original cost. Innovative formulation approaches, such as patch delivery systems, command premium pricing due to convenience and improved adherence.

Market penetration is enhanced through collaborations with healthcare systems and insurers. Subscription and value-based arrangements may influence revenue streams, especially amidst increasing scrutiny over drug pricing.

Patent Expiry and Generic Competition

The expiration of key patents in Europe (around 2016) and North America (around 2012-2013) heralded a wave of generic competitors. This resulted in substantial price declines (up to 80%) and eroded profit margins for original patent-holders. However, sustained demand continues, albeit at lower price points.

Future Market Outlook and Financial Trajectory

Research and Development Landscape

Advancements in formulations, combination therapies, and biomarkers for early detection may influence rivastigmine’s future trajectory. While no new chemical entities of rivastigmine are anticipated soon, lifecycle management through dosage optimization and novel delivery systems could bolster revenue.

Market Expansion Opportunities

Emerging markets offer significant growth prospects due to demographic shifts and expanding healthcare access. Additionally, regulatory approvals for extended indications, such as Lewy body dementia, may augment market size.

Potential Challenges

Evolving therapeutic paradigms favor disease-modifying agents over symptomatic treatments, risking a decline in rivastigmine’s long-term prominence. Moreover, safety concerns and side effect profiles may influence prescriber preference.

Strategic Considerations

  • Cost-Effective Manufacturing: Leveraging biosimilar or generic production can sustain profitability amidst pricing pressures.
  • Partnerships and Licensing: Collaborations with biotech firms focusing on early diagnosis or neuroprotective strategies could augment market relevance.
  • Regulatory Engagement: Proactive engagement to secure approvals for expanded indications enhances market longevity.

Key Takeaways

  • Demand driven by demographic aging ensures a steady baseline need for rivastigmine tartrate in neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Market growth is constrained by patent expirations and aggressive generic competition, with revenue declines in mature markets offset by expansion in emerging economies.
  • Formulation innovations, such as transdermal patches, provide differentiation but must be balanced against pricing pressures.
  • Long-term profitability hinges on lifecycle management, strategic partnerships, and potential integration into combination therapies or early diagnosis protocols.
  • The future landscape is uncertain, with emerging disease-modifying therapies potentially displacing symptomatic agents like rivastigmine.

Conclusion

Rivastigmine tartrate maintains a significant role in symptomatic management of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. While patent expiries and the advent of generics challenge revenue streams, demographic trends and therapeutic innovations continue to support its market presence. Stakeholders must navigate complex pricing, regulatory, and competitive environments, leveraging formulation improvements and strategic alliances to maximize financial trajectory.

FAQs

1. How does rivastigmine tartrate compare to other cholinesterase inhibitors in efficacy?
Rivastigmine offers comparable symptomatic benefits to donepezil and galantamine but has a unique transdermal formulation that improves adherence and reduces gastrointestinal side effects, providing an advantage in certain patient populations [1].

2. What factors influence the pricing of rivastigmine in different regions?
Pricing depends on healthcare system reimbursement policies, patent status, competition from generics, manufacturing costs, and formulation type. Developed markets tend to have higher prices, while emerging markets benefit from lower-cost generics [2].

3. What is the impact of patent expiration on rivastigmine’s market share?
Patent expiry typically leads to the entry of generic producers, significantly reducing prices and profitability for original developers. However, brand loyalty, formulation advantages, and regulatory exclusivities can mitigate this impact temporarily [3].

4. Are there ongoing research efforts to develop disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s?
Yes, numerous clinical trials are exploring amyloid-targeting agents, neuroprotective compounds, and biomarkers for early detection. These developments could eventually diminish rivastigmine’s role as a symptomatic agent [4].

5. What opportunities exist for expanding rivastigmine’s therapeutic indications?
Potential extensions include treatment for Lewy body dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and combination regimens. Regulatory approval for these indications could sustain or grow market revenues [5].


References

[1] Birks, J. (2006). Cholinesterase inhibitors for mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
[2] Miertschin, N., et al. (2016). Pricing and Reimbursement Strategies of Pharmaceuticals: Trends and Challenges. Pharmaceutical Economics.
[3] Kesselheim, A. S., et al. (2010). Patent Expiration and Generic Competition in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine.
[4] Cummings, J., et al. (2021). Disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s: The promise and the challenges. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[5] World Health Organization. (2022). Dementia: Key facts and future directions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.