You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Acitretin - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for acitretin
Drug Prices for acitretin

See drug prices for acitretin

Recent Clinical Trials for acitretin

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Army Medical University, ChinaPHASE4
Sheikh Zayed Medical CollegePHASE2
South Valley UniversityNA

See all acitretin clinical trials

Pharmacology for acitretin
Drug ClassRetinoid
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for acitretin

US Patents and Regulatory Information for acitretin

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Impax Labs Inc ACITRETIN acitretin CAPSULE;ORAL 202552-001 Dec 23, 2015 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Stiefel Labs Inc SORIATANE acitretin CAPSULE;ORAL 019821-002 Oct 28, 1996 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Alembic ACITRETIN acitretin CAPSULE;ORAL 217774-002 Aug 5, 2024 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax Labs Inc ACITRETIN acitretin CAPSULE;ORAL 202552-004 Dec 23, 2015 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Alembic ACITRETIN acitretin CAPSULE;ORAL 217774-003 Aug 5, 2024 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mylan ACITRETIN acitretin CAPSULE;ORAL 202148-002 Sep 10, 2015 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Acitretin

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Acitretin, a second-generation oral retinoid, is primarily prescribed to treat severe psoriasis and other keratinization disorders. Its unique therapeutic profile, coupled with evolving market forces, shapes its commercial trajectory. This analysis explores the market dynamics influencing acitretin's demand, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and financial outlook, offering healthcare stakeholders a comprehensive understanding of its position within the pharmaceutical ecosystem.


Pharmacological Profile and Clinical Indications

Acitretin functions by modulating keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, effectively managing psoriasis refractory to other treatments. Its FDA approval in 1996 cemented its role in dermatological therapy. While highly effective, acitretin's teratogenicity and side effect profile necessitate cautious dosing and patient monitoring, influencing prescribing trends (1).

Key Indications:

  • Severe plaque psoriasis
  • Pityriasis rubra pilaris
  • Keratinization disorders

The efficacy of acitretin, paired with a favorable safety profile relative to earlier retinoids, sustains its clinical relevance despite competition from biologics.


Market Dynamics Influencing Acitretin

1. Competitive Landscape

The dermatology market has experienced a paradigm shift with the advent of biologic therapies such as secukinumab, ixekizumab, and adalimumab. These agents demonstrate superior efficacy and more favorable safety profiles, especially for moderate to severe psoriasis (2). Consequently, acitretin's market share faces pressure from these newer, targeted treatments.

However, acitretin retains a pivotal role in:

  • Patients contraindicated for biologics
  • Those preferring oral medications
  • Long-term management where biologic costs are prohibitive

2. Regulatory Environment and Patent Status

Acitretin, a generic drug, entered the market post-patent expiration, fostering price competition and broader accessibility across regions. Regulatory agencies' stringent controls on teratogenicity management have mandated robust prescribing guidelines, influencing its utilization.

In some markets, regulatory constraints have limited its use among women of childbearing potential, reducing potential patient pools.

3. Pricing, Reimbursement, and Healthcare Policies

Price sensitivity in healthcare systems, particularly in cost-cutting environments, favors lower-cost generics like acitretin. Reimbursement policies in high-income countries often favor biologics due to their efficacy, but in low to middle-income settings, acitretin remains a cost-effective option.

Additionally, government initiatives promoting biosimilars and generics could sustain acitretin’s market presence through price advantages.

4. Technological and Formulation Innovations

Limited innovation has characterized acitretin’s formulation, with no recent breakthrough therapies improving its pharmacokinetics or compliance. This stagnation restricts market expansion, highlighting the need for drug delivery enhancements.

Conversely, research into combination therapies with biologics could redefine its role, although such combinations remain experimental.


Market Size and Financial Trajectory

Current Market Size and Trends

The global dermatology therapeutics market was valued at approximately USD 40 billion in 2021, with psoriasis accounting for a significant segment (3). Acitretin's share within this sector, although declining, is estimated at several hundred million USD annually, mainly driven by use in emerging markets and specific clinical niches.

In developed nations, the decline of acitretin parallels increased biologic adoption. In contrast, developing economies rely on affordable generics, providing steady demand.

Forecasted Growth and Drivers

Projections suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 2-3% for the acitretin market over the next five years, mainly due to:

  • Expanding psoriasis prevalence globally (4)
  • Increasing access to affordable generics
  • Growing awareness of psoriasis management

However, these gains are tempered by:

  • The rise of biologic and small-molecule therapies
  • Stringent safety monitoring requirements
  • Regulatory restrictions on teratogenic drugs

Financial Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Market share erosion due to biologics
  • Regulatory constraints impacting prescribing
  • Patent and exclusivity limitations, especially in some jurisdictions

Opportunities:

  • Strategic positioning in cost-sensitive markets
  • Developing combination therapy protocols
  • Enhanced formulations ensuring better compliance

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

The teratogenic risk of acitretin necessitates strict regulatory oversight, including pregnancy prevention programs. These requirements augment costs and complicate marketing strategies.

Ethically, ensuring optimal risk-benefit ratios remains paramount. Regulatory agencies are increasingly emphasizing pharmacovigilance and post-marketing surveillance, influencing market dynamics indirectly.


Conclusion and Strategic Insights

While acitretin faces competitive pressures from biologics and evolving treatment paradigms, its cost-effectiveness and sustained relevance in specific patient populations secure its financial trajectory, particularly in emerging markets. Continual regulatory adaptation and formulation innovation could unlock new growth avenues. Companies should consider positioning acitretin as a complementary therapy, emphasizing affordability and safety.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Position: Acitretin remains relevant in cost-sensitive regions, but global market share diminishes with biologic innovations.
  • Growth Drivers: Rising psoriasis prevalence and increasing access to generics underpin steady demand.
  • Challenges: Competition from targeted biologics, regulatory hurdles linked to teratogenicity, and limited formulation innovations constrain growth.
  • Opportunities: Strategic focus on emerging markets, combination therapies, and improved drug delivery systems can enhance profitability.
  • Regulatory Considerations: Ongoing pharmacovigilance and strict prescribing guidelines influence market penetration and financial outcomes.

FAQs

1. What are the primary drivers for acitretin's market stability?
Its cost-effectiveness, efficacy in severe psoriasis, and use in patients contraindicated for biologics sustain demand, especially in emerging markets.

2. How does the patent status impact acitretin’s market dynamics?
Patent expiry led to generic availability, increasing affordability but intensifying price competition, which reduces profit margins.

3. What regulatory hurdles affect acitretin’s use?
Strict teratogenicity monitoring and pregnancy prevention programs limit patient access, especially among women of childbearing potential.

4. How are biologics influencing acitretin’s market?
Biologics offer superior efficacy with better safety profiles, leading to declining acitretin prescriptions in developed regions.

5. What future strategies could enhance acitretin’s market share?
Formulation improvements, combination therapies, and targeted marketing in developing markets can boost its financial outlook.


References

  1. Current Therapeutic Research. 2020.
  2. NICE Guidelines on Psoriasis. 2022.
  3. Market Research Future. "Dermatology Therapeutics Market." 2022.
  4. Global Psoriasis Market Analysis. 2021.

Disclaimer: This analysis is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or medical advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.