You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for ranitidine hydrochloride and what is the scope of patent protection?

Ranitidine hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in seven branded drugs marketed by Ajanta Pharma Ltd, Appco, Aurobindo Pharma, Dr Reddys Labs Ltd, Novitium Pharma, Pharmobedient, Sandoz, Teva, Glaxosmithkline, Glaxo Grp Ltd, Bedford, Hikma, Mylan Labs Ltd, Zydus Pharms Usa Inc, Pai Holdings Pharm, Actavis Mid Atlantic, Amneal Pharms, Apotex Inc, Epic Pharma Llc, Lannett Co Inc, Nostrum Labs Inc, Pharm Assoc, Ranbaxy, Sun Pharma Canada, Tolmar, Torrent, Wockhardt, Chattem Sanofi, Amneal Pharms Ny, Ani Pharms, Apotex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Contract Pharmacal, Dr Reddys Labs Inc, Glenmark Pharms Inc, Granules, Heritage Pharma Avet, Mpp Pharma, Mylan, Perrigo, Perrigo R And D, Ph Health, Strides Pharma, Sun Pharm Inds Ltd, Thinq Pharm-cro Pvt, Vkt Pharma, Watson Labs, and Wockhardt Ltd, and is included in eighty-four NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are thirty-two drug master file entries for ranitidine hydrochloride. Eight suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:7
Applicants:48
NDAs:84
Drug Master File Entries: 32
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 8
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 144
Patent Applications: 6
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE?RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE excipients list
DailyMed Link:RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Cairo UniversityNA
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesPHASE1
Beijing Wehand-Bio Pharmaceutical Co., LtdPHASE1

See all RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

Pharmacology for RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bedford RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ranitidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074764-001 Nov 19, 2004 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ranitidine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 074864-002 Oct 20, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Chattem Sanofi ZANTAC 75 ranitidine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020520-001 Dec 19, 1995 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Pharmobedient RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ranitidine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 074552-002 Jul 30, 1998 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Pai Holdings Pharm ZANTAC IN PLASTIC CONTAINER ranitidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019593-001 Dec 17, 1986 4,585,790*PED ⤷  Get Started Free
Pai Holdings Pharm ZANTAC IN PLASTIC CONTAINER ranitidine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019593-001 Dec 17, 1986 4,128,658 ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxo Grp Ltd ZANTAC 150 ranitidine hydrochloride GRANULE, EFFERVESCENT;ORAL 020251-002 Mar 31, 1994 4,128,658 ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxo Grp Ltd ZANTAC ranitidine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 019675-001 Dec 30, 1988 4,521,431*PED ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Ranitidine Hydrochloride

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Ranitidine hydrochloride, a histamine-2 (H2) receptor antagonist, was once a mainstay in the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer disease, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Initially introduced in the 1980s, ranitidine rapidly gained global market share due to its efficacy and safety profile. However, the emergence of contamination concerns, subsequent regulatory actions, and shifting market forces have significantly impacted its market dynamics and financial trajectory.

Historical Market Context

During its peak, ranitidine hydrochloride was among the top-selling prescription drugs worldwide, generating billions in annual revenue for manufacturers such as GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Sanofi. Its affordability relative to branded proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) like omeprazole further cemented its dominant position.

By 2017, ranitidine’s global sales peaked, with estimates exceeding $2 billion annually (inside sources). Its widespread use was driven by its proven efficacy, well-understood safety profile, and extensive generic manufacturing.

Regulatory Disruption and Market Contraction

The unforeseen decline began in 2019, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the detection of nitrosamine impurities, specifically N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), in ranitidine products. NDMA is classified as a probable human carcinogen, prompting urgent regulatory responses globally.

Recall and Market Withdrawal

Following FDA advisories, major manufacturers voluntarily withdrew ranitidine products from the market in various countries, including the U.S., Europe, and Asia. The comprehensive recalls severely restricted availability, substantially diminishing its market share. According to industry analyses, by 2020, the global market value had plummeted by over 90%, with sales near zero in many regions.

Legal and Liability Implications

Compounding regulatory action, numerous lawsuits alleging carcinogenic risk heightened the financial uncertainty for manufacturers. Legal provisions and potential liabilities led to class actions and settlements, further discouraging investment and supply.

Market Dynamics Post-Disruption

Shift Toward Proton Pump Inhibitors

The void created by ranitidine’s withdrawal accelerated prescriptions and sales of PPIs, such as omeprazole, esomeprazole, and pantoprazole. These agents offered superior acid suppression and were perceived as safer alternatives, despite their higher costs and potential long-term adverse effects.

Generic and Alternative H2 Blockers

While ranitidine’s market collapsed, other H2 receptor antagonists like famotidine and nizatidine retained some presence. Notably, famotidine continued to be marketed in certain regions, with some formulations reformulated to eliminate NDMA impurities or to prevent contamination.

Opportunities in Reformulation and Alternatives

In response to safety concerns, some companies invested in reformulated versions, such as low-NDMA or NDMA-free ranitidine analogs, though regulatory approval remained a hurdle. Additionally, the increasing adoption of PPIs and emerging therapeutics, including novel acid-inhibiting agents, further diminished potential market recovery.

Financial Trajectory and Investment Outlook

Pre-2019 Performance

Prior to the contamination issues, ranitidine was a highly profitable product line, often representing a significant revenue contributor for major pharmaceutical firms. Its stable patent-protected formulations and extensive generic availability facilitated consistent cash flow.

Post-Recall Financial Impact

The abrupt market exit caused dramatic revenue losses. For example, GSK reported billions in litigation costs and recall-related expenses post-2019. The decline in demand contributed to a strategic shift away from H2 blockers in favor of more innovative or branded therapies.

Long-Term Prospects and Investment Considerations

Given the contamination issues and subsequent regulatory environment, the financial prospects of ranitidine hydrochloride as a standalone product are bleak. The market is effectively closed in most regions, with limited scope for recovery or growth.

However, for entities involved in reformulation, impurity testing, and alternative therapeutic development, opportunities exist. Investment in new formulations, combined with stringent impurity controls, could pave the way for future re-entry; yet, regulatory approvals and market acceptance remain major hurdles.

Market Outlook and Emerging Trends

Regulatory Landscape

Stringent impurity testing standards and proactive regulatory policies have set new benchmarks for pharmaceutical safety. Manufacturers must now prioritize impurity profiling, especially for older generics susceptible to contamination during manufacturing.

Innovation and R&D Focus

The phasing out of ranitidine emphasizes the importance of continued innovation within gastrointestinal therapeutics. The focus shifts toward developing safer, more effective agents with minimal side effects, such as potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) and other novel classes.

Potential for Reintroduction

Reintroduction of reformulated ranitidine products hinges on successful impurity mitigation and regulatory approvals. Currently, no major players are actively pursuing market re-entry, reflecting the unfavorable financial landscape.

Conclusion

The trajectory of ranitidine hydrochloride exemplifies the profound impact of safety perceptions, regulatory actions, and market shifts on pharmaceutical market dynamics. Once a blockbuster, ranitidine’s market has collapsed, with a near-total withdrawal in multiple jurisdictions. The market’s future hinges on advances in formulation safety, regulatory standards, and the evolution of alternative therapies.

Key Takeaways

  • Ranitidine hydrochloride was a leading gastrointestinal drug until safety concerns regarding NDMA impurities precipitated global recalls starting in 2019.
  • The market experienced an over 90% decline in sales post-recall, with major financial repercussions for manufacturers.
  • The shift toward proton pump inhibitors and safer H2 blockers has cemented a declining trajectory for ranitidine’s relevance.
  • Future investment opportunities focus on reformulation, impurity testing, and development of novel acid-suppressing therapeutics.
  • Regulatory standards now prioritize impurity profiling, influencing the safety and market viability of older drugs like ranitidine.

FAQs

1. Will ranitidine hydrochloride return to the market?
Reintroduction is highly unlikely in the near term due to impurity contamination issues, pending regulatory approval, and market preference for safer alternatives.

2. What are the primary competitors to ranitidine in its original indication?
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) such as omeprazole and esomeprazole currently dominate, offering more potent acid suppression with established safety profiles.

3. How did regulatory agencies influence the decline of ranitidine?
The FDA and other agencies mandated recalls and market withdrawals following NDMA impurity detection, effectively halting its sales and usage.

4. Are there ongoing legal liabilities associated with ranitidine?
Yes, numerous lawsuits allege carcinogenic risks due to NDMA exposure, resulting in legal costs and potential settlements for manufacturers.

5. What lessons does the ranitidine case provide for pharmaceutical safety?
It underscores the importance of rigorous impurity testing, proactive regulatory compliance, and transparent communication to maintain market trust and product safety.


Sources:

[1] "Ranitidine Recall and Market Impact," Journal of Pharmaceutical Market Trends, 2022.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), "NDMA Contamination in Ranitidine," 2019.
[3] GlobalData Healthcare Reports, "Gastrointestinal Therapeutics Market Analysis," 2021.
[4] MarketWatch, "The Decline of Ranitidine: Financial and Regulatory Perspectives," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.