Last Updated: May 10, 2026

METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for methylprednisolone sodium succinate and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Methylprednisolone sodium succinate is the generic ingredient in four branded drugs marketed by Abbott, Hospira, Hospira Inc, Elkins Sinn, Organon Usa Inc, Abraxis Pharm, Amneal, Bedford Labs, Eugia Pharma, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Hikma, Intl Medication, Sagent Pharms Inc, Teva Parenteral, Tianjin Kingyork, Watson Labs, and Pharmacia And Upjohn, and is included in forty-nine NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are two drug master file entries for methylprednisolone sodium succinate. Sixteen suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:4
Applicants:17
NDAs:49
Drug Master File Entries: 2
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 16
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 44
Patent Applications: 4,837
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE?METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE excipients list
DailyMed Link:METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityPHASE4
Henan Provincial People's HospitalPHASE4
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang UniversityPHASE4

See all METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE clinical trials

Pharmacology for METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE
A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment
A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS
A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS
A Alimentary tract and metabolism
A07EA Corticosteroids acting locally
A07E INTESTINAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENTS
A07 ANTIDIARRHEALS, INTESTINAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY/ANTIINFECTIVE AGENTS
A Alimentary tract and metabolism
C05AA Corticosteroids
C05A AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDS AND ANAL FISSURES FOR TOPICAL USE
C05 VASOPROTECTIVES
C Cardiovascular system
D07AA Corticosteroids, weak (group I)
D07A CORTICOSTEROIDS, PLAIN
D07 CORTICOSTEROIDS, DERMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS
D Dermatologicals
D07AA Corticosteroids, weak (group I)
D07A CORTICOSTEROIDS, PLAIN
D07 CORTICOSTEROIDS, DERMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS
D Dermatologicals
D07XA Corticosteroids, weak, other combinations
D07X CORTICOSTEROIDS, OTHER COMBINATIONS
D07 CORTICOSTEROIDS, DERMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS
D Dermatologicals
D10AA Corticosteroids, combinations for treatment of acne
D10A ANTI-ACNE PREPARATIONS FOR TOPICAL USE
D10 ANTI-ACNE PREPARATIONS
D Dermatologicals
H02AB Glucocorticoids
H02A CORTICOSTEROIDS FOR SYSTEMIC USE, PLAIN
H02 CORTICOSTEROIDS FOR SYSTEMIC USE
H Systemic hormonal preparations, excluding sex hormones and insulins
H02AB Glucocorticoids
H02A CORTICOSTEROIDS FOR SYSTEMIC USE, PLAIN
H02 CORTICOSTEROIDS FOR SYSTEMIC USE
H Systemic hormonal preparations, excluding sex hormones and insulins
R01AD Corticosteroids
R01A DECONGESTANTS AND OTHER NASAL PREPARATIONS FOR TOPICAL USE
R01 NASAL PREPARATIONS
R Respiratory system
S01BA Corticosteroids, plain
S01B ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENTS
S01 OPHTHALMOLOGICALS
S Sensory organs
S01CB Corticosteroids/antiinfectives/mydriatics in combination
S01C ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENTS AND ANTIINFECTIVES IN COMBINATION
S01 OPHTHALMOLOGICALS
S Sensory organs
S02BA Corticosteroids
S02B CORTICOSTEROIDS
S02 OTOLOGICALS
S Sensory organs
S03BA Corticosteroids
S03B CORTICOSTEROIDS
S03 OPHTHALMOLOGICAL AND OTOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS
S Sensory organs

US Patents and Regulatory Information for METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Fresenius Kabi Usa METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE methylprednisolone sodium succinate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 040583-001 Jul 30, 2004 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Tianjin Kingyork METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE methylprednisolone sodium succinate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 212396-002 Apr 20, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira A-METHAPRED methylprednisolone sodium succinate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 089173-001 Aug 18, 1987 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abraxis Pharm METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE methylprednisolone sodium succinate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 089189-001 Mar 28, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 23, 2026

Methylprednisolone sodium succinate is a short- to intermediate-acting, parenteral corticosteroid used across acute inflammatory and allergic indications. The market dynamics are dominated by (1) generic penetration after originator expiry, (2) procurement-driven hospital buying for injectable products, (3) inventory and supply continuity for sterile injectables, and (4) pricing pressure typical of mature, low-differentiation steroid injectables. Financial trajectory for manufacturers is constrained by ongoing generic competition, tender-based pricing, and periodic manufacturing capacity and regulatory compliance risks.

What does the product market look like today?

Core product form and typical setting

  • Dosage form: injectable methylprednisolone sodium succinate (water-soluble salt form enabling IV or IM use).
  • Use setting: hospitals, emergency departments, specialty infusion centers, and acute-care protocols.
  • Clinical positioning: “bridging” and acute management of inflammation where IV steroid therapy is used (e.g., severe allergic reactions, asthma exacerbations, autoimmune flare management, neurologic and inflammatory crises), often aligned to inpatient formularies and acute-care order sets.

Competitive structure

  • Competition type: largely generic.
  • Differentiation: limited by pharmacopoeial identity, bioequivalence expectations, and standardization of active ingredient strength and route of administration.
  • Buying behavior: tender and contract pricing; substitution among therapeutically equivalent corticosteroid injectables is routine when procurement rules allow.

Demand drivers

  • Seasonality: higher respiratory/allergy exacerbation volumes during specific periods can lift episodic demand for acute steroids.
  • Protocol-driven demand: steroid usage is strongly protocolized in many inpatient pathways, limiting demand elasticity.
  • Hospital formulary stability: once a product gains formulary listing, switching is often difficult mid-contract.

Demand constraints

  • Clinician preference stability vs substitution: preference for “usual brands” can persist, but procurement and shortages can force rotation.
  • Safety and monitoring requirements: system-level monitoring limits overuse; however, acute indications still create baseline demand.

What are the pricing and margin dynamics?

Pricing behavior for sterile injectable generics

  • Price compression is typical after market entry of multiple ANDA/generic equivalents.
  • Contracts and tenders drive net price down faster than list price; hospital netbacks reflect rebate structures and distribution agreements.
  • Shortages lift pricing temporarily: when supply disruptions occur at the manufacturing or packaging level, wholesalers and distributors can re-price inventories; those premiums generally reverse after supply normalizes.

Margin profile

  • Gross margins tend to be thin versus branded drugs because:
    • competitive bidding reduces unit economics,
    • compliance costs for sterile manufacturing are structurally high,
    • and inventory turnover is constrained by lead times and expiration management.
  • Net margins depend on:
    • manufacturing utilization (fixed-cost absorption),
    • batch yield and sterility assurance costs,
    • and working capital tied to long lead-time supply chains.

Market concentration vs commoditization

  • In mature generic injectables, a small number of suppliers often dominate availability in specific package sizes or strengths.
  • Even with commoditization, supplier concentration can create short-cycle pricing power during localized supply constraints.

What supply-side forces shape availability and financial outcomes?

Sterile manufacturing constraints

Sterile injectable corticosteroids are sensitive to:

  • aseptic processing capacity,
  • validated cleanroom throughput,
  • container closure integrity for vials,
  • and stability/expiration lot management.

Any reduction in manufacturing capacity, packaging availability, or QA release throughput tends to propagate into distributor and hospital pipeline shortages.

Regulatory and quality compliance

  • GMP compliance and batch release performance determine fill-rates.
  • Recalls or warning letters (even isolated) can temporarily reshape market share and drive procurement shifts, often benefiting competing suppliers with uninterrupted supply.

Sourcing and distribution

  • Wholesaler allocation is common during constrained supply.
  • Distribution contracts (national accounts) can lock in purchase commitments but also demand continuity; failures can trigger rapid rebids to alternative suppliers.

What does the financial trajectory look like for manufacturers?

Baseline trajectory for a mature generic steroid injectable

For methylprednisolone sodium succinate, the financial trajectory generally follows a mature generic pattern:

  • Phase 1: Entry/early competition
    Competitive offerings reduce pricing but still permit some volume growth and share capture, especially for suppliers with scale and reliable supply.
  • Phase 2: Multi-supplier normalization
    Net prices settle into a commodity range, with revenue growth increasingly dependent on procurement share, contract expansions, and supply reliability rather than unit pricing.
  • Phase 3: Cyclical disruption and consolidation
    Periodic manufacturing disruptions, quality events, or withdrawal/discontinuation of certain SKUs can create temporary premiums and share spikes; longer-term consolidation can raise stability for remaining suppliers.

Key financial KPIs

  • Net sales: driven by hospital contract wins, SKU coverage, and fill-rate performance.
  • Gross margin: most influenced by utilization rates and pricing compression.
  • Operating margin: dependent on overhead absorption in sterile manufacturing and regulatory compliance cost.
  • Working capital: tied to inventory management and expiration risk (especially for slow-moving strengths or packaging formats).
  • Market share volatility: sensitive to supply continuity and contract rebids after stockouts.

Where are opportunities and risks in the product’s commercial path?

Opportunities

  1. Secure procurement agreements with IDNs and group purchasing organizations by guaranteeing availability for high-volume package sizes and consistent lead times.
  2. Strength and packaging portfolio: selling across multiple vial strengths and package configurations reduces lost purchasing when distributors rotate supply.
  3. Service-level performance: in sterile injectables, “on-time and complete” delivery often wins the next contract cycle.

Risks

  1. Sustained price compression as more generic competitors maintain capacity and bid for tenders.
  2. Manufacturing yield and QC release delays that impair fill-rates and trigger customer substitution.
  3. Regulatory events that can lead to temporary suspension, forcing immediate reallocations to competitors.
  4. Inventory write-offs from expiration or order cancellations tied to formulary shifts or budget tightening.

What do market signals in global and US drug pricing imply?

System-level pricing pressure

US and global drug pricing trends for mature injectables reflect:

  • substitution and generic competition,
  • tender-driven net pricing,
  • and limited therapeutic differentiation.

These forces typically lead to:

  • slower revenue growth relative to volume,
  • reliance on market share stability and supply reliability,
  • and periodic revenue spikes only when competitors face supply constraints.

Hospital formulary and reimbursement dynamics

  • For hospital-administered products, reimbursement is often bundled or accounted for in DRG and payer contracts, making procurement price and supply reliability decisive.
  • Formularies can be stable once products are established, but budget cycles and shortages enable mid-cycle switching.

Competitive benchmark: how this molecule usually behaves versus other injectable steroids

Compared with other mature injectable corticosteroids (same therapeutic class, similar usage patterns), methylprednisolone sodium succinate typically exhibits:

  • lower pricing power due to generic commoditization,
  • similar supply-risk sensitivity driven by sterile manufacturing constraints,
  • similar demand elasticity because acute indications depend on clinical protocol rather than marketing.

Key sensitivities that determine revenue outcomes

Contract and tender calendar effects

  • Revenue is sensitive to:
    • annual or multi-quarter tender cycles,
    • rebidding after outages,
    • and group purchasing organization contract renewals.

Supply continuity

  • Fill-rate and lot release performance drive:
    • conversion of pilot formularies into long-term listings,
    • reduced risk of stockouts,
    • and customer retention.

SKU-level dynamics

  • Some vial strengths/package configurations may be more in demand than others.
  • Revenue outcomes often hinge on which SKUs a supplier reliably supplies, not only total molecule volume.

Key Takeaways

  • Market dynamics are generic- and procurement-led: pricing is shaped by hospital tenders, not therapeutic differentiation.
  • Financial trajectory is mature-generic: net sales tend to track volume and market share stability; unit pricing trends downward and margin depends on manufacturing utilization and QC throughput.
  • Supply continuity is the primary swing factor: sterile manufacturing disruptions and lot release issues drive short-cycle revenue shifts and margin volatility.
  • Winners are operational: robust aseptic capacity, high batch release consistency, and contract execution determine durable commercial performance.

FAQs

1) Is methylprednisolone sodium succinate a branded- or generic-led market?

It is generic-led in most practical purchasing channels because injectable corticosteroids with this active ingredient are mature and widely available in therapeutically equivalent forms.

2) What most influences hospital purchasing decisions for this product?

Net contract pricing, formulary listing, and supply reliability (fill-rate and lot availability) drive purchasing more than differentiating clinical claims.

3) Why do sterile injectable shortages matter so much for the revenue trajectory?

Sterile injectable shortages can force distributor allocation and hospital substitution. Suppliers with uninterrupted capacity can capture incremental share and sometimes short-term pricing premiums until supply normalizes.

4) What is the margin sensitivity profile?

Margins are highly sensitive to aseptic manufacturing utilization, QC release costs, batch yield, and expiration/working capital management, because price competition compresses gross margin.

5) What are the main long-run growth limits?

Long-run growth is constrained by generic competition and limited differentiation. Growth depends mainly on market share, contract wins, and SKU coverage rather than premium pricing.


References

[1] FDA. Generic Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ (accessed 2026-04-23).
[2] FDA. Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book) search results for methylprednisolone sodium succinate. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ (accessed 2026-04-23).
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Model Lists of Essential Medicines (corticosteroids as class references). https://www.who.int/ (accessed 2026-04-23).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.