Share This Page
Drugs Containing Excipient (Inactive Ingredient) GLYCERYL BEHENATE
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Branded drugs containing GLYCERYL BEHENATE excipient, and estimated key patent expiration / generic entry dates
| Company | Tradename | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient | Potential Generic Entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAT Rx USA LLC | WELLBUTRIN | bupropion hydrochloride | 16590-246 | GLYCERYL BEHENATE | |
| STAT RX USA LLC | APLENZIN | bupropion hydrobromide | 16590-922 | GLYCERYL BEHENATE | 2026-06-27 |
| Rebel Distributors Corp | WELLBUTRIN XL | bupropion hydrochloride | 21695-137 | GLYCERYL BEHENATE | |
| >Company | >Tradename | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient | >Potential Generic Entry |
Generic drugs containing GLYCERYL BEHENATE excipient
| Company | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAT RX USA LLC | gabapentin | 16590-104 | GLYCERYL BEHENATE |
| STAT Rx USA LLC | bupropion hydrochloride | 16590-246 | GLYCERYL BEHENATE |
| STAT RX USA LLC | bupropion hydrobromide | 16590-922 | GLYCERYL BEHENATE |
| >Company | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient |
Glyceryl Behenate Market Dynamics, Applications, Suppliers, and Financial Outlook
Glyceryl behenate is a specialty lipid excipient used mainly in modified-release tablets, lipid-based drug delivery, oral solid-dose manufacturing, cosmetics, and selected food applications. Its commercial value is driven by formulation performance rather than bulk volume. The market has a defensible specialty-excipient profile because pharmaceutical customers qualify suppliers, validate manufacturing performance, and often avoid switching after regulatory approval.
Public companies do not generally report glyceryl behenate revenue as a separate product line. Financial analysis therefore relies on end-market demand, supplier positioning, formulation activity, raw-material costs, and customer qualification barriers rather than audited product-level sales.
What is glyceryl behenate and how is it used?
Glyceryl behenate is a mixture of glycerol esters of behenic acid, generally containing mono-, di-, and tri-glycerides. It is also known by the chemical designation glyceryl tribehenate or glycerol behenate, depending on grade and composition.
Its main pharmaceutical functions are:
| Function | Formulation role |
|---|---|
| Modified-release matrix former | Controls drug diffusion and erosion in sustained-release tablets |
| Lubricant | Reduces friction during compression and ejection |
| Lipid carrier | Supports lipid-based oral delivery systems |
| Taste-masking aid | Helps reduce immediate drug release in some formulations |
| Tablet coating or processing aid | Improves processing and surface characteristics |
| Cosmetic structurant | Adds consistency and emollience to creams, balms, and color cosmetics |
Glyceryl behenate is particularly relevant when formulators need a hydrophobic matrix that can be processed by direct compression, granulation, or hot-melt techniques. The material can support controlled release without relying exclusively on hydrophilic polymers such as hypromellose.
Which pharmaceutical products use glyceryl behenate?
Glyceryl behenate is used in oral solid-dose products, especially formulations requiring extended or delayed release. The excipient can be used alone or combined with polymers, waxes, surfactants, and other lipids.
Typical applications include:
- Sustained-release tablets
- Multiparticulate pellets
- Granules and minitablets
- Lipid matrix formulations
- Taste-masked oral dosage forms
- Nutraceutical tablets and capsules
- Poorly water-soluble drug formulations
- Direct-compression formulations
- Solid lipid systems
The best commercial opportunities are products with complex release profiles, narrow therapeutic windows, or formulation designs that are difficult to reproduce with a simple immediate-release tablet.
Glyceryl behenate is not generally the primary excipient in conventional high-volume immediate-release tablets. That limits unit demand but supports higher value per kilogram in technically demanding formulations.
Which companies supply glyceryl behenate?
The leading branded pharmaceutical grade is Compritol 888 ATO, supplied by Gattefossé. It is widely recognized as a glyceryl behenate-based excipient for modified-release and lipid-based formulations.
| Supplier or product family | Market position | Primary relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Gattefossé, Compritol 888 ATO | Leading pharmaceutical-grade branded product | Modified release, lipid matrices, direct compression |
| BASF and other specialty excipient suppliers | Adjacent lipid and formulation technologies | Competing or complementary lipid systems |
| Regional excipient manufacturers | Price-sensitive and local supply | Generic pharmaceutical and industrial applications |
| Cosmetic and food ingredient suppliers | Broader ester and lipid portfolios | Cosmetics, personal care, and food uses |
Gattefossé has positioned Compritol 888 ATO through formulation support, technical documentation, regulatory information, and application development. That model creates switching costs beyond the physical material. Customers qualify particle size, polymorphism, ester composition, flow, compaction, dissolution performance, and batch consistency.
The relevant competitive market is broader than glyceryl behenate alone. Alternative materials include glyceryl palmitostearate, glyceryl stearate, hydrogenated vegetable oils, carnauba wax, beeswax, stearic acid, polyethylene glycol, ethylcellulose, and hypromellose.
How large is the glyceryl behenate market?
There is no reliable public financial disclosure for a standalone global glyceryl behenate market. Commercial market reports often aggregate glyceryl behenate with pharmaceutical lipids, fatty-acid esters, tablet lubricants, or specialty excipients. Those broader figures should not be treated as glyceryl behenate revenue.
The market is best characterized as:
- Small relative to bulk pharmaceutical excipients
- Higher margin than commodity tablet fillers and binders
- Concentrated among a limited number of qualified suppliers
- Closely tied to oral solid-dose development
- Supported by recurring demand from approved products
- Exposed to customer concentration and formulation substitution
The financial profile resembles a specialty ingredient rather than a commodity chemical. Revenue growth depends more on new product approvals, generic launches, and penetration of complex formulations than on overall tablet volume.
What is driving demand for glyceryl behenate?
Growth in modified-release medicines
Modified-release products use excipient systems to control drug release over several hours or longer. Glyceryl behenate can form a hydrophobic matrix that slows water ingress and drug diffusion. Demand therefore follows development of extended-release products in cardiovascular, central nervous system, metabolic, pain, and gastrointestinal indications.
Generic reformulation and complex generics
Generic manufacturers increasingly pursue products with formulation barriers, including extended-release tablets, multiparticulates, and poorly soluble drugs. Glyceryl behenate can be part of the formulation platform for these products.
The commercial benefit for suppliers is repeat demand after approval. Once an excipient system is embedded in an approved product and supported by process validation, substitution becomes less attractive unless cost savings are material.
Oral delivery of poorly soluble compounds
Lipid excipients can improve wetting, dissolution, and drug dispersion. Glyceryl behenate is not a universal solubilizer, but it can be used in lipid-based and solid-dispersion strategies where the formulation requires a structured lipid matrix.
Nutraceutical and consumer health demand
Nutraceutical tablets, capsules, and functional powders can generate incremental demand. These applications are usually more price-sensitive and have lower regulatory switching costs than pharmaceutical products.
Cosmetics and personal care
Glyceryl behenate provides emolliency and structure in creams, balms, lip products, and other semisolid formulations. Cosmetic demand broadens the customer base but usually produces lower technical barriers than pharmaceutical use.
What factors determine glyceryl behenate pricing?
Pricing is influenced by feedstock, grade, manufacturing complexity, and regulatory documentation.
| Cost driver | Financial effect |
|---|---|
| Behenic acid and vegetable-oil feedstocks | Determines the largest variable-cost component |
| Hydrogenation and esterification | Affects conversion cost and energy use |
| Purification and fraction control | Raises cost for pharmaceutical grades |
| Particle-size engineering | Increases processing and quality-control expense |
| GMP production | Adds facility, testing, and documentation costs |
| Regional freight and import duties | Creates geographic price differences |
| Customer qualification | Supports premium pricing for established brands |
| Supply concentration | Reduces price transparency and can protect margins |
Pharmaceutical-grade glyceryl behenate generally commands a premium over cosmetic or industrial material. The premium reflects certificate-of-analysis requirements, traceability, microbiological controls, residual testing, stability data, technical support, and change-control obligations.
A supplier with a validated pharmaceutical grade can maintain pricing even when lower-cost material is available, provided the customer values regulatory continuity and manufacturing reproducibility.
How strong is the patent estate for glyceryl behenate?
Glyceryl behenate itself is an established excipient, not a newly patented active pharmaceutical ingredient. The core material is unlikely to have meaningful composition-of-matter exclusivity in major markets.
The relevant intellectual-property categories are:
- Formulations using glyceryl behenate as a matrix former.
- Drug-specific extended-release compositions.
- Multiparticulate or pellet manufacturing processes.
- Hot-melt and lipid-processing methods.
- Combination excipient systems.
- Drug-excipient ratios and dissolution profiles.
- Delivery systems for poorly soluble active ingredients.
Patent risk therefore attaches mainly to the finished drug product and formulation architecture, not to the sale of glyceryl behenate as a raw excipient.
A glyceryl behenate supplier may hold trademarks, technical know-how, manufacturing controls, and proprietary particle engineering without owning broad enforceable patent rights over the chemical substance. The practical moat is often qualification and performance data rather than patent exclusivity.
What is the FDA and Orange Book status of glyceryl behenate?
Glyceryl behenate is an inactive pharmaceutical ingredient. It is not an FDA-approved active ingredient and does not receive a standalone Orange Book listing.
The FDA Inactive Ingredient Database is the principal public source for determining whether an excipient has precedent in approved drug products, dosage forms, and routes of administration. The database is used by formulators and ANDA sponsors when assessing inactive-ingredient precedent, although the presence of an excipient in the database does not eliminate the need for product-specific regulatory justification.[1]
The Orange Book lists approved drug products and patent or exclusivity information associated with those products. It does not list excipients as independent products.[2]
For a pharmaceutical-grade supplier, regulatory value comes from:
- DMF or equivalent regulatory support
- Compendial compliance where applicable
- GMP manufacturing
- Change-control procedures
- Impurity and residual-solvent data
- Stability information
- Traceability of raw materials
- Consistent composition and particle-size distribution
When does glyceryl behenate lose exclusivity?
Glyceryl behenate does not have a standalone drug exclusivity period comparable to an active pharmaceutical ingredient. There is no independent Hatch-Waxman exclusivity clock for the excipient.
Exclusivity can instead arise at the drug-product level. An extended-release tablet containing glyceryl behenate may be protected by:
- Drug-substance patents
- Formulation patents
- Method-of-use patents
- Dosage-regimen patents
- Manufacturing-process patents
- Regulatory exclusivity attached to the approved product
Those rights belong to the drug-product sponsor or patent owner and may expire on different dates. The expiration of a formulation patent can enable generic entry without eliminating demand for glyceryl behenate, because generic manufacturers may use the same excipient or a functionally equivalent material.
Are there Paragraph IV challenges involving glyceryl behenate?
Paragraph IV certifications apply to patents listed for an approved drug product, not to an excipient sold independently. A generic sponsor may challenge patents covering an extended-release product that uses glyceryl behenate, but the certification would target the listed drug-product patents.
The commercial consequences are indirect:
- A successful Paragraph IV challenge can accelerate generic entry.
- Generic entry can increase excipient volume.
- Price erosion in the finished drug can pressure formulation costs.
- The generic may retain glyceryl behenate or switch to another lipid system.
- A formulation patent may force redesign around a different excipient ratio or release mechanism.
The excipient supplier therefore benefits from product launches and generic substitution but does not control the patent litigation outcome unless it is also involved in formulation technology or indemnification arrangements.
Does glyceryl behenate face biosimilar risk?
Direct biosimilar risk is negligible. Biosimilars are biologic products and generally use different formulation platforms from oral small-molecule tablets, where glyceryl behenate has its strongest position.
Indirect risk can arise if pharmaceutical development shifts from oral small molecules to injectable biologics, long-acting biologic delivery systems, or other dosage forms that do not use glyceryl behenate. That is a portfolio-level risk rather than a direct substitution threat.
What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers protect suppliers?
The strongest barriers are operational and regulatory.
Manufacturing barriers
Consistent glyceryl behenate requires control over:
- Fatty-acid chain-length distribution
- Esterification profile
- Mono-, di-, and triglyceride content
- Melting range
- Solid-state behavior
- Particle-size distribution
- Moisture and impurity levels
- Powder flow and compressibility
Small changes in ester composition or particle engineering can alter tablet hardness, dissolution, lubrication, and release kinetics. Pharmaceutical customers therefore evaluate the excipient as a process-critical material rather than a generic commodity.
Intellectual-property barriers
Potentially protectable areas include:
- Specific drug-glyceryl behenate compositions
- Release profiles
- Coated multiparticulates
- Manufacturing temperatures and shear conditions
- Particle engineering
- Combination systems with polymers or surfactants
These rights are generally narrower than patents covering a new active ingredient. Their value depends on whether the formulation produces a clinically or commercially important performance advantage.
What licensing deals involve glyceryl behenate?
Public licensing agreements specifically centered on glyceryl behenate are limited. The material is commonly sold through direct supply, distribution, technical-support, or preferred-vendor arrangements rather than headline licensing transactions.
Commercial agreements may include:
- Regional distribution rights
- Pharmaceutical-grade supply agreements
- Joint formulation development
- Technical-service arrangements
- Customer-specific particle engineering
- Dual-sourcing and contingency supply
- Regulatory-support commitments
The absence of public licensing disclosures does not mean the product lacks commercial value. Specialty excipient economics often depend on recurring supply and customer qualification rather than royalty-bearing intellectual property.
How does glyceryl behenate compare with competing excipients?
| Excipient | Primary strength | Relative competitive risk to glyceryl behenate |
|---|---|---|
| Hypromellose | Established hydrophilic extended-release matrix | High in conventional sustained-release tablets |
| Glyceryl palmitostearate | Lipid matrix and release control | Direct substitution risk |
| Hydrogenated vegetable oil | Low-cost hydrophobic matrix | High in price-sensitive products |
| Carnauba wax | Strong hydrophobic barrier | Moderate, depending on processability |
| Ethylcellulose | Robust polymeric release control | High in multiparticulate systems |
| PEG-based systems | Solubilization and hot-melt processing | Moderate |
| Glyceryl stearate | Lubrication and lipid structuring | Moderate, but performance differs |
Glyceryl behenate is strongest where its melting behavior, compaction profile, and release characteristics are validated in a specific formulation. It is weaker where the customer prioritizes lowest cost or can meet the target dissolution profile with a standard polymer.
What is the financial trajectory for glyceryl behenate?
The likely financial trajectory is stable to moderately positive, with growth concentrated in higher-value pharmaceutical applications.
Near-term outlook
Demand should track:
- New extended-release approvals
- Complex generic launches
- Oral dosage-form development
- Nutraceutical production
- Cosmetic lipid demand
- Pharmaceutical outsourcing and regional manufacturing
Near-term margin risk comes from vegetable-oil feedstock volatility, freight costs, energy prices, and customer pressure to qualify alternative suppliers.
Medium-term outlook
The strongest growth opportunity is in differentiated formulation support. Suppliers that provide dissolution modeling, processing guidance, scale-up support, and regulatory packages can capture more value than suppliers selling an undifferentiated lipid powder.
The market may also see wider use in:
- Continuous manufacturing
- Direct compression
- Abuse-deterrent dosage forms
- Multiparticulate delivery
- Pediatric modified-release products
- Fixed-dose combinations
Downside scenarios
Revenue and margins could weaken if:
- Customers move to lower-cost hydrogenated oils.
- Hypromellose or ethylcellulose meets the same release target.
- A major customer redesigns a formulation.
- Feedstock costs rise faster than contract pass-throughs.
- Regional suppliers achieve acceptable pharmaceutical quality.
- Supply interruptions reduce confidence in a single branded grade.
Which generic launch scenarios affect glyceryl behenate demand?
| Generic scenario | Effect on glyceryl behenate |
|---|---|
| Generic copies the reference formulation | Volume increases if the same excipient is selected |
| Generic designs around a formulation patent | Volume may remain stable or decline if another matrix is used |
| Multiple ANDA entrants launch | Unit demand can rise while finished-drug pricing falls |
| Reference product loses market share | Demand depends on generic formulation choices |
| Complex generic fails bioequivalence | Delays excipient demand |
| Supplier is qualified by several manufacturers | Recurring demand becomes more resilient |
The most favorable scenario is broad generic adoption of a validated glyceryl behenate platform. The least favorable is successful redesign around a cheaper excipient with equivalent dissolution and manufacturing performance.
What geographic markets are most important?
North America and Europe remain important because of mature generic markets, extensive regulatory precedent, and demand for high-quality pharmaceutical excipients. India and China are significant growth markets because of pharmaceutical manufacturing scale, generic production, and expanding domestic drug consumption.
Regional competition is strongest where local manufacturers can provide:
- GMP documentation
- Consistent batch quality
- Regulatory support
- Competitive freight economics
- Reliable supply continuity
A supplier’s geographic advantage depends on both production location and the regulatory acceptability of its manufacturing site. Pharmaceutical customers may prefer a higher-priced supplier with established documentation over a lower-priced source that requires extensive qualification.
Key Takeaways
- Glyceryl behenate is a specialty lipid excipient used primarily in modified-release and lipid-based oral formulations.
- Gattefossé’s Compritol 888 ATO is a leading branded pharmaceutical-grade product.
- Public companies do not disclose glyceryl behenate revenue separately, so standalone market-size estimates require caution.
- The commercial moat comes from qualification, formulation data, manufacturing consistency, and regulatory support.
- Glyceryl behenate has no independent Orange Book listing or standalone drug exclusivity period.
- Paragraph IV litigation can affect demand indirectly through patents covering finished extended-release products.
- Direct biosimilar risk is minimal because glyceryl behenate is used mainly in oral small-molecule formulations.
- The main substitutes are hypromellose, ethylcellulose, glyceryl palmitostearate, hydrogenated vegetable oils, and carnauba wax.
- Financial growth is most likely in complex generics, modified-release products, direct compression, and technical formulation services.
- Feedstock costs, supplier qualification, and customer-specific formulation performance are the principal margin drivers.
FAQs About Glyceryl Behenate
Is glyceryl behenate the same as Compritol 888 ATO?
Compritol 888 ATO is a branded pharmaceutical-grade glyceryl behenate product supplied by Gattefossé. The commercial grade includes controlled composition and specifications that may not be identical to every material sold under the generic name glyceryl behenate.
Is glyceryl behenate a lubricant or a release-control excipient?
It can perform both functions. In many tablet formulations, its principal commercial value is as a hydrophobic matrix former for modified release, while it also contributes lubrication during compression.
Can glyceryl behenate be replaced without a new drug application?
A change may require regulatory assessment because excipient composition, level, particle size, and processing can affect dissolution and bioequivalence. The filing pathway depends on the approved product, the scale of the change, and applicable FDA requirements.
Does glyceryl behenate have a public drug master file?
Pharmaceutical suppliers may maintain drug master files or equivalent regulatory packages, but the existence, number, and accessibility of a specific file should be verified through the supplier and applicable regulatory records.
Is glyceryl behenate a high-margin excipient?
Pharmaceutical-grade material can support specialty-excipient margins because of qualification and technical-support requirements. Margins are lower in cosmetic, food, and industrial applications where customers are more price-sensitive and switching barriers are weaker.
References
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Inactive Ingredient Database. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/inactive-ingredients-database-iid
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: The Orange Book. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/approved-drug-products-therapeutic-equivalence-evaluations-orange-book
-
Gattefossé. (n.d.). Compritol 888 ATO: Glyceryl behenate for pharmaceutical applications. https://www.gattefosse.com
-
United States Pharmacopeia. (n.d.). United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary. U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention.
-
European Medicines Agency. (2016). Guideline on excipients in the dossier for application for marketing authorisation of a medicinal product. https://www.ema.europa.eu
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Generic Entry Opportunies 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Make Better Decisions
- Identify first generic entrants
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Obtain formulation and manufacturing information