Share This Page
Drugs Containing Excipient (Inactive Ingredient) ACESULFAME POTASSIUM
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Branded drugs containing ACESULFAME POTASSIUM excipient, and estimated key patent expiration / generic entry dates
| Company | Tradename | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient | Potential Generic Entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haleon US Holdings LLC | NICORETTE | nicotine polacrilex | 0135-0241 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM | |
| Haleon US Holdings LLC | NICORETTE | nicotine polacrilex | 0135-0474 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM | |
| Haleon US Holdings LLC | NICORETTE | nicotine polacrilex | 0135-0508 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM | |
| Haleon US Holdings LLC | NICORETTE | nicotine polacrilex | 0135-0625 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM | |
| Haleon US Holdings LLC | NICORETTE | nicotine polacrilex | 0135-2800 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM | |
| >Company | >Tradename | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient | >Potential Generic Entry |
Generic drugs containing ACESULFAME POTASSIUM excipient
| Company | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient |
|---|---|---|---|
| L Perrigo Company | nicotine polacrilex | 0113-0029 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM |
| L Perrigo Company | nicotine polacrilex | 0113-0053 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM |
| L Perrigo Company | loperamide hydrochloride, simethicone | 0113-0087 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM |
| L Perrigo Company | nicotine polacrilex | 0113-0170 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM |
| L Perrigo Company | nicotine polacrilex | 0113-0206 | ACESULFAME POTASSIUM |
| >Company | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient |
Acesulfame Potassium Excipient Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory
Acesulfame potassium, also known as acesulfame K or Ace-K, is a high-intensity sweetener used as an inactive ingredient in oral pharmaceutical products. Its pharmaceutical market is smaller than its food and beverage market, but it benefits from low usage levels, high sweetness, strong thermal stability, and broad regulatory acceptance. The financial outlook is stable rather than high-growth: demand is tied primarily to oral dosage-form volumes, while pricing remains exposed to Asian production capacity and commodity-style competition.
What is the pharmaceutical role of acesulfame potassium?
Acesulfame potassium is a synthetic, non-nutritive sweetener with approximately 200 times the sweetness of sucrose. In pharmaceutical products, it is used to improve palatability rather than to provide therapeutic activity.
Typical applications include:
| Pharmaceutical format | Role of acesulfame potassium |
|---|---|
| Chewable tablets | Masks bitterness and improves patient acceptance |
| Orally disintegrating tablets | Provides rapid sweetness with low mass contribution |
| Oral powders and granules | Improves taste after reconstitution |
| Syrups and oral solutions | Sweetens pediatric and liquid formulations |
| Effervescent products | Supports palatability in acidic or flavored systems |
| Combination products | Reduces bitterness from active pharmaceutical ingredients |
Acesulfame potassium is particularly useful where formulators need a sweetener that contributes little bulk. It is water-soluble, heat-stable and compatible with many solid and liquid oral formulations. Its intense sweetness allows lower inclusion levels than sucrose, dextrose, sorbitol or mannitol.
The ingredient does not have a therapeutic indication, National Drug Code market or standalone FDA drug approval. Its commercial value is derived from use as an excipient in finished pharmaceutical products.
What is the FDA regulatory status of acesulfame potassium?
The FDA regulates acesulfame potassium primarily as a food additive and recognizes its use as an inactive pharmaceutical ingredient. FDA regulations list acesulfame potassium under 21 C.F.R. § 172.800, subject to specified conditions of use [1].
The core regulatory facts are:
| Regulatory item | Status |
|---|---|
| FDA food-additive regulation | 21 C.F.R. § 172.800 |
| FDA status in pharmaceutical products | Inactive ingredient |
| FDA acceptable daily intake | 15 mg/kg body weight per day |
| Primary pharmaceutical route | Oral |
| FDA Orange Book listing | No standalone listing |
| FDA exclusivity | None as an excipient |
| Prescription-drug approval | Not applicable |
| Regulatory function | Sweetener and taste-masking agent |
The FDA has permitted acesulfame potassium in a widening range of food and beverage applications since its initial approvals in the late 1980s. FDA safety reviews have concluded that authorized uses do not present a safety concern at permitted exposure levels [2].
The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives established an acceptable daily intake of up to 15 mg/kg body weight [3]. The European Food Safety Authority applies an acceptable daily intake of 9 mg/kg body weight per day for the European Union [4]. The difference does not generally prevent use in pharmaceutical formulations because excipient quantities are normally small relative to food exposure.
What pharmacopeial and quality standards apply to acesulfame potassium?
Pharmaceutical buyers generally qualify acesulfame potassium against a compendial monograph, supplier specification or both. The relevant quality controls can include:
- Identification and assay
- Water content
- Residual solvents
- Related substances
- Heavy metals or elemental impurities
- Microbial limits
- Particle-size distribution
- Bulk density
- Residual inorganic salts
- Stability under expected storage conditions
The United States Pharmacopeia-National Formulary and European Pharmacopoeia are important commercial quality references for pharmaceutical-grade material. A manufacturer supplying regulated drug markets normally must provide a certificate of analysis, change-control commitments, manufacturing-site information and supporting impurity data.
The principal technical risk is not the sweetening function. It is batch-to-batch consistency and control of process-related impurities. Customers may require tighter specifications than those used for food-grade material, creating a price distinction between pharmaceutical-grade and standard food-grade product.
How large is the acesulfame potassium pharmaceutical market?
There is no reliable public financial disclosure for pharmaceutical-grade acesulfame potassium as a standalone market. Producers generally report it within broader sweetener, food-ingredient or specialty-ingredient businesses. Public market reports also use different definitions, often combining acesulfame potassium with sucralose, aspartame, saccharin, steviol glycosides and other high-intensity sweeteners.
The market structure is best described as follows:
| Market characteristic | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Total demand base | Primarily food and beverage |
| Pharmaceutical share | Minority share of global volume |
| Pharmaceutical growth driver | Oral liquid, chewable and orally disintegrating products |
| Pricing model | Contract supply plus spot and distributor sales |
| Customer concentration | Higher in pharmaceutical supply than in food |
| Switching cost | Moderate after qualification |
| Product differentiation | Limited at the molecule level; higher at quality and supply level |
| Margin profile | Higher for qualified pharmaceutical supply than commodity food supply |
| Public revenue visibility | Low |
Pharmaceutical demand is structurally defensive. Acesulfame potassium is consumed in small quantities per unit, so changes in active pharmaceutical ingredient volumes have a larger effect on the number of formulations than on the cost of each finished product. The excipient usually represents a negligible share of the finished drug's cost.
What factors are driving acesulfame potassium demand?
The strongest demand drivers are formulation convenience, pediatric palatability and growth in patient-friendly oral dosage forms.
Oral dosage-form growth
Orally disintegrating tablets, chewables and oral liquids remain important where swallowing difficulty, pediatric administration or rapid disintegration affects product selection. Acesulfame potassium can be incorporated into low-dose formulations without materially increasing tablet size or viscosity.
Taste masking
Many active pharmaceutical ingredients are bitter, metallic or otherwise unpleasant. Acesulfame potassium is often used with flavors, polymers, sweeteners and bitterness-blocking agents. It is rarely the only taste-masking tool in a difficult formulation.
Sugar reduction
Pharmaceutical companies increasingly use intense sweeteners to reduce sucrose and caloric content in pediatric syrups, supplements and consumer-health products. Acesulfame potassium can also be combined with sucralose or polyols to improve taste balance.
Thermal and formulation stability
The ingredient is suitable for products exposed to heat during processing or storage. Its stability profile supports use in tablets, powders and selected liquid systems, although pH, microbial control and compatibility must be evaluated for each formulation.
Global regulatory acceptance
Acceptance in the United States, European Union and international food-safety frameworks reduces the need for country-specific toxicology work. Pharmaceutical sponsors still need product-specific excipient assessment, but the global safety record supports procurement and formulation reuse.
What limits the financial growth of the acesulfame potassium market?
The pharmaceutical opportunity is constrained by four factors.
First, the ingredient has low value per dose. Acesulfame potassium can improve patient acceptance without materially increasing the selling price of a drug, but that also limits the absolute revenue available to the excipient supplier.
Second, formulations can substitute other sweeteners. Sucralose, aspartame, saccharin, steviol glycosides, sodium cyclamate where permitted, and polyols can compete for the same taste-masking function. Selection depends on taste profile, stability, regulatory status and compatibility.
Third, customers can qualify multiple suppliers. Once a drug manufacturer has validated equivalent material, price and supply reliability become major purchasing factors.
Fourth, the largest demand pool is outside pharmaceuticals. Food and beverage producers can influence capacity utilization, pricing and investment even when pharmaceutical demand is stable.
Who manufactures and supplies pharmaceutical-grade acesulfame potassium?
The supplier base includes established specialty-ingredient companies and Asian manufacturers. Nutrinova is associated with the Sunett brand of acesulfame potassium. Chinese producers also supply global food and pharmaceutical markets, including manufacturers such as Anhui Jinhe Industrial Co., Ltd. The commercial supplier set changes through capacity additions, ownership changes, distributor arrangements and customer qualification decisions.
A buyer evaluating a supplier should assess:
- Manufacturing-site inspection history.
- GMP controls for pharmaceutical-grade production.
- Regulatory support for United States, European and Asian markets.
- Change-notification periods.
- Dual-sourcing capability.
- Residual-solvent and impurity controls.
- Capacity outside China.
- Lead times and inventory policy.
- Documentation for excipient risk assessment.
- Ability to support pediatric and liquid formulations.
The largest competitive advantage is usually supply reliability and documentation rather than molecular differentiation.
What is the financial trajectory for acesulfame potassium suppliers?
No major producer appears to report acesulfame potassium revenue as a separate public segment. Celanese has historically included Nutrinova and related food ingredients within broader reporting structures, limiting direct analysis of product-level sales [5]. Private and regional manufacturers generally do not disclose product-level revenue, volume or margins.
The financial trajectory can be divided into three periods:
| Period | Market condition | Financial effect |
|---|---|---|
| 2020-2021 | Supply-chain disruption and logistics pressure | Higher freight, inventory and working-capital costs |
| 2022-2023 | Input-cost inflation and normalization of logistics | Price volatility and margin pressure |
| 2024 onward | More normalized supply and competitive capacity | Lower pricing power, steadier volume growth |
The base-case outlook is low-single-digit volume growth in pharmaceutical applications, with revenue growth dependent on price retention and product mix. Pharmaceutical-grade material should maintain better pricing than commodity food-grade material because customers incur qualification costs when changing suppliers.
Margin expansion would require one of three developments:
- Higher pharmaceutical-grade mix.
- Long-term contracts with large drug manufacturers.
- Greater supply concentration or capacity discipline.
Margin compression would result from new Asian capacity, distributor destocking, lower food-and-beverage pricing or successful substitution by other sweeteners.
How strong is the patent estate for acesulfame potassium?
Acesulfame potassium has no meaningful modern composition-of-matter patent barrier. The original discovery and manufacturing patents date back several decades and are expired. The molecule is therefore available for manufacture by qualified suppliers, subject to regulatory, quality and process requirements.
The current protection profile is:
| IP category | Commercial position |
|---|---|
| Core molecule | Public-domain and long expired |
| Foundational synthesis patents | Expired |
| Formulation patents | Possible, but generally cover a specific drug composition rather than acesulfame potassium itself |
| Manufacturing process patents | Potentially relevant if narrow, current and enforceable |
| Supplier trade secrets | Relevant to yield, purification and impurity control |
| Brand rights | Possible for trademarks such as Sunett |
| Pharmaceutical exclusivity | None for the excipient itself |
The primary barriers are manufacturing know-how, regulatory qualification, customer audits, analytical methods and supply-chain reliability. These are practical barriers, not durable exclusivity rights.
What patent litigation, Paragraph IV challenges and settlements affect acesulfame potassium?
Acesulfame potassium itself does not have an Orange Book patent estate. It is not a listed drug product, so it does not generate ordinary Paragraph IV litigation, Hatch-Waxman settlements or generic-entry litigation.
Patent disputes can still involve a drug product that uses acesulfame potassium. In those cases, the relevant patents may cover:
- The active pharmaceutical ingredient.
- A taste-masked formulation.
- An orally disintegrating tablet.
- A liquid formulation.
- A method of treating a disease.
- A specific combination of sweetener, flavor and active ingredient.
Acesulfame potassium would normally be an ingredient inside the claimed formulation, not the source of exclusivity. A generic applicant could challenge a formulation patent that recites acesulfame potassium, but the challenge would concern the drug product's claim scope rather than ownership of the excipient.
When does acesulfame potassium lose exclusivity?
Acesulfame potassium has already lost molecule-level exclusivity. There is no pending FDA exclusivity period, patent cliff or biosimilar event associated with the excipient.
| Exclusivity question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Composition patent expiration | Historical patents expired |
| FDA new chemical entity exclusivity | Not applicable |
| Orphan-drug exclusivity | Not applicable |
| Pediatric exclusivity | Not applicable |
| Orange Book patent expiry | No standalone listing |
| Biosimilar exclusivity | Not applicable |
| Generic launch date | Already available from multiple suppliers |
The relevant commercial risk is supplier substitution, not generic entry against a protected molecule.
What manufacturing and IP barriers affect market entry?
Manufacturing acesulfame potassium requires chemical synthesis, purification, crystallization and quality control. The exact process is commercially important because impurities, color, particle characteristics and yield can affect customer acceptance.
A new supplier faces several barriers:
- Capital investment in chemical manufacturing.
- Process safety and environmental controls.
- Qualification against customer specifications.
- Regulatory support across multiple jurisdictions.
- Demonstration of consistent impurity profiles.
- Reliable availability of starting materials.
- Multi-year customer validation cycles.
- Technical support for formulation scientists.
Trade secrets may protect process economics, but they do not prevent competitors from producing the molecule through an alternative route. The strongest protection is operational execution combined with customer qualification.
How does acesulfame potassium compare with competing pharmaceutical sweeteners?
| Excipient | Relative strength | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Acesulfame potassium | Intense sweetness, low dose, heat stability | Bitter aftertaste at higher levels |
| Sucralose | Strong taste profile and broad acceptance | Higher cost in some markets |
| Aspartame | Good sugar-like taste | Phenylalanine labeling and lower heat stability |
| Saccharin sodium | Low cost and strong sweetness | Aftertaste and regulatory preferences |
| Stevia glycosides | Plant-derived positioning | Taste variability and formulation complexity |
| Sorbitol or mannitol | Sweetness plus bulk and mouthfeel | Higher dose and caloric or gastrointestinal considerations |
Acesulfame potassium is most competitive where low dosage, cost control and processing stability matter. Sucralose may be preferred where taste quality is more important than unit cost. Polyols are more useful when the formulation requires bulk, cooling sensation or tablet mass.
What generic launch risks exist for drugs containing acesulfame potassium?
For a finished pharmaceutical product, acesulfame potassium creates little standalone generic-entry risk. The risk depends on the drug's active ingredient, listed patents, formulation claims and regulatory pathway.
A generic applicant may use acesulfame potassium if the reference product's inactive ingredients are not protected and the proposed formulation meets applicable requirements. A formulation patent could create a barrier if it requires a specific ratio, dosage form, particle structure or combination of excipients. Such patents must be analyzed at the drug-product level.
For drug manufacturers, the main commercial risk is reverse: a generic competitor can often reproduce the taste-masking function with acesulfame potassium or another sweetener. The excipient rarely supports meaningful product differentiation on its own.
What is the geographic coverage of the acesulfame potassium market?
The United States, European Union and China are the main regulatory and manufacturing reference markets. India, Southeast Asia, Latin America and the Middle East are important growth markets for oral medicines, consumer health products and processed foods.
Regional considerations include:
- United States: FDA food-additive regulation and drug-excipient qualification.
- European Union: E950 designation and EFSA exposure limits.
- China: domestic food and pharmaceutical standards, with exports subject to destination-market requirements.
- India: growing oral-liquid and generic-drug manufacturing base.
- Japan and South Korea: demanding quality and documentation requirements.
- Emerging markets: increasing use of lower-cost oral dosage forms and pediatric products.
Global suppliers benefit from regulatory dossiers that can be reused across markets. Local registration, language requirements and customer audits still create execution costs.
Key Takeaways
- Acesulfame potassium is an established oral pharmaceutical sweetener, not an active drug ingredient.
- Its pharmaceutical demand is stable but smaller than food and beverage demand.
- Growth is linked to chewables, orally disintegrating tablets, pediatric medicines and oral liquids.
- FDA regulation is established under 21 C.F.R. § 172.800; FDA's acceptable daily intake is 15 mg/kg body weight per day.
- The European Union uses an acceptable daily intake of 9 mg/kg body weight per day.
- The molecule has no current composition-of-matter exclusivity or standalone Orange Book listing.
- Paragraph IV litigation, biosimilar competition and FDA exclusivity do not apply to the excipient itself.
- Supplier economics depend on scale, process yield, pharmaceutical-grade qualification and supply reliability.
- The main financial risk is commodity-style price competition from Asian capacity.
- The main commercial opportunity is higher-margin, qualified pharmaceutical supply rather than molecule-level IP protection.
FAQs
Is acesulfame potassium safe in pharmaceutical formulations?
Regulators including the FDA, EFSA and JECFA have evaluated acesulfame potassium and established acceptable daily intake levels. Pharmaceutical use is normally low relative to total dietary exposure.
Does acesulfame potassium require an FDA DMF?
An FDA Drug Master File is not automatically required for every excipient. A supplier may provide regulatory information through a DMF, customer dossier or direct documentation package, depending on the sponsor's filing strategy and product risk assessment.
Can acesulfame potassium be used in pediatric medicines?
Yes. It is used in pediatric oral liquids, chewables and orally disintegrating products, subject to product-specific safety, exposure, taste and formulation assessments.
Is pharmaceutical-grade acesulfame potassium more expensive than food-grade material?
It can command a premium because of tighter specifications, documentation, audits, testing and change-control requirements. The premium varies by supplier, volume, region and contract terms.
Can a pharmaceutical company switch from acesulfame potassium to sucralose?
A switch may require formulation development, taste testing, stability studies, analytical review and regulatory assessment. The operational burden depends on whether the change affects composition, labeling, product performance or approved regulatory filings.
References
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). 21 C.F.R. § 172.800: Acesulfame potassium. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/section-172.800
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Additional information about high-intensity sweeteners permitted for use in food in the United States. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/high-intensity-sweeteners
-
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. (1991). Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: Thirty-seventh report of JECFA. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/
-
European Food Safety Authority. (2011). Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of acesulfame K as a food additive. EFSA Journal, 9(6), 2177. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2177
-
Celanese Corporation. (2024). Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. https://investors.celanese.com/financial-information/annual-reports-and-proxy-statements/default.aspx
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Generic Entry Opportunies 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Make Better Decisions
- Identify first generic entrants
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Drug patents in 130+ countries