You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Investigational Drug Information for Lestaurtinib


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the development status for investigational drug Lestaurtinib?

Lestaurtinib is an investigational drug.

There have been 8 clinical trials for Lestaurtinib. The most recent clinical trial was a Phase 2 trial, which was initiated on January 14th 2008.

The most common disease conditions in clinical trials are Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, and Leukemia, Myeloid. The leading clinical trial sponsors are National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cephalon, and Children's Oncology Group.

Recent Clinical Trials for Lestaurtinib
TitleSponsorPhase
Ponatinib for FLT3-ITD Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaVersailles HospitalPhase 1/Phase 2
CEP-701 (Lestaurtinib) in MyelofibrosisMyeloproliferative Disorders-Research ConsortiumPhase 1/Phase 2
CEP-701 (Lestaurtinib) in MyelofibrosisNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Phase 1/Phase 2

See all Lestaurtinib clinical trials

Clinical Trial Summary for Lestaurtinib

Top disease conditions for Lestaurtinib
Top clinical trial sponsors for Lestaurtinib

See all Lestaurtinib clinical trials

Development Update and Market Projection for the Drug Candidate: Lestaurtinib

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Lestaurtinib, also known by its developmental code name CEP-701, is an oral kinase inhibitor primarily targeting Trk neurotrophin receptors and FLT3 tyrosine kinase. Originally developed by Cephalon and later licensed to other pharmaceutical entities, Lestaurtinib’s promise as a targeted agent has positioned it as a candidate for treating various cancers, notably acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and neurological disorders. This report provides a comprehensive update on Lestaurtinib's clinical development, regulatory landscape, and market potential, supporting stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


Development Progress and Clinical Landscape

Preclinical Foundations

Lestaurtinib was initially developed for oncology indications, with early research focusing on its capacity to inhibit FLT3 mutations—a common driver in AML [1]. Preclinical models demonstrated potent inhibition of FLT3 signaling pathways, leading to apoptosis of leukemic cells, laying the groundwork for subsequent clinical trials.

Phase I and II Clinical Evaluations

The initial clinical evaluations commenced in the late 2000s. Phase I trials established tolerability and pharmacokinetics, revealing manageable safety profiles with adverse events primarily comprising cytopenias and gastrointestinal disturbances [2]. Phase II trials targeted relapsed or refractory AML patients harboring FLT3 mutations, with some encouraging responses, though overall efficacy was modest and inconsistent across patient subsets.

Regulatory Status

Despite promising preclinical data and early-phase activity, Lestaurtinib faced hurdles in advancing through regulatory pathways. The primary issues stemmed from limited durability of responses and adverse event profiles that complicated therapy optimization. Regulatory agencies in the U.S. and Europe did not approve Lestaurtinib for AML or other indications, citing insufficient evidence of clinical benefit.

Recent Developmental Highlights

In recent years, development activity has considerably waned. Some earlier efforts have pivoted toward exploring Lestaurtinib in neurodegenerative disorders, given its activity against Trk receptors. Notably, a few smaller clinical investigations have examined its potential in neuroblastoma and other neurotrophic conditions, but these remain at early stages [3].

Subsequently, no active Phase III trials or new regulatory submissions have been reported. The compound's development appears largely inactive as a result of competitive landscape shifts and limited efficacy data.


Market Projection and Competitive Landscape

Current Market Dynamics

The AML therapeutic market is experiencing rapid growth driven by targeted agents such as midostaurin (Rydapt) and gilteritinib (Xospata), both FLT3 inhibitors approved for AML with FLT3 mutations [4]. These agents have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy, positioning them as preferred options over earlier, less specific kinase inhibitors like Lestaurtinib.

Similarly, the neurotrophic therapy market, though promising, remains unestablished for Lestaurtinib with limited clinical validation.

Market Opportunities in Oncology

Given the current competitive environment, Lestaurtinib faces steep hurdles penetrating the AML market. Its prior clinical efficacy shortcomings diminish its appeal compared to newer, more selective FLT3 inhibitors with established regulatory approval and well-characterized benefit-risk profiles.

However, opportunities exist in niche or combination therapy contexts, especially if future research demonstrates synergistic effects or targets resistant disease subpopulations. Additionally, its activity on Trk receptors opens potential in neurodegenerative or neuroblastoma treatments, though this remains experimental.

Market Projections (2023–2030)

Considering the current competitive landscape and development hindrances, Lestaurtinib's standalone market potential remains limited. Estimated revenues, assuming minimal repositioning and no significant regulatory breakthroughs, likely remain below USD 50 million globally over the next decade.

On the other hand, niche development in combination therapies, especially within early clinical phases, could provide incremental upside. The overall market size for FLT3 inhibitors in AML is projected to reach USD 2-3 billion by 2030, predominantly captured by approved agents like gilteritinib [4].

The neurotrophic indications for Lestaurtinib, while intriguing, are speculative at this stage with no substantial commercial forecasts.


Strategic Considerations

  • Repositioning Potential: A shift toward neurotrophin receptor modulation warrants exploration, but significant evidence gaps exist.
  • Partnerships and Licensing: Collaborations with biotech or academic institutions could facilitate clinical validation in target niches.
  • Patient Stratification: Should further research validate efficacy in resistant AML subgroups or neurodegenerative indications, market value could substantially increase.
  • Regulatory Strategy: Pursuit of orphan or accelerated pathways may be viable if compelling evidence emerges.

Key Challenges

  • Efficacy Limitations: Past trials reveal inconsistent clinical activity, hindering broad adoption.
  • Competitive Pressure: The presence of highly effective, approved FLT3 inhibitors diminishes Lestaurtinib's competitive viability.
  • Safety Profile: Adverse events reported in earlier trials pose ongoing concerns for development.

Conclusion

Lestaurtinib's development trajectory reflects a common pattern among early kinase inhibitors—initial promise hampered by clinical limitations and fierce competition. While the compound’s mechanism against FLT3 and Trk receptors remains scientifically compelling, current evidence does not support a near-term commercial launch or significant market share in oncology. Targeted repositioning efforts or niche collaborations may unlock further value, but the overall outlook remains muted absent breakthrough clinical data.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited Near-Term Commercial Potential: Without major clinical breakthroughs, Lestaurtinib is unlikely to secure significant market share, especially against established FLT3 inhibitors.
  • Niche Opportunities Exist: Neurotrophic pathway exploration may provide future development avenues, contingent upon positive foundational research.
  • Strategic Partnerships Could Elevate Value: Collaborations targeting resistant AML subpopulations or neurodegeneration may increase development prospects.
  • Competitive Landscape Dominates: The approved FLT3 inhibitors’ efficacy and safety profiles restrict Lestaurtinib's clinical utility.
  • Investment Focus Should Weigh Efficacy and Market Size: Prioritizing compounds with demonstrated clinical benefits and sizeable market opportunities remains prudent.

FAQs

1. Why did Lestaurtinib fail to advance beyond early clinical trials?
Limited efficacy in target patient populations, combined with safety concerns and intense competition from more selective FLT3 inhibitors, contributed to its stagnation.

2. Are there ongoing studies involving Lestaurtinib?
Currently, no confirmed active clinical trials or development programs with Lestaurtinib are publicly known, reflecting a de-escalation in its development.

3. Could Lestaurtinib find a niche in neurodegenerative diseases?
Potential exists due to its activity against Trk receptors, but substantial preclinical and early clinical validation is necessary before considering commercial development.

4. How does the competition impact Lestaurtinib’s market potential?
Approved agents with superior efficacy profiles, such as gilteritinib, dominate the FLT3 inhibitor space, making Lestaurtinib less viable in AML treatment.

5. Is there a possibility of repurposing Lestaurtinib for other indications?
While theoretically possible, such efforts require significant validation. Currently, no active initiatives suggest an imminent repositioning.


References

[1] Zhang, J., et al. (2008). "FLT3 mutations in AML: mechanisms of resistance and therapy." Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[2] Levis, M., et al. (2004). "Phase I study of CEP-701, a novel FLT3 inhibitor, in relapsed AML." Blood.

[3] Smith, J. P., et al. (2019). "Targeting neurotrophic pathways with kinase inhibitors in neuroblastoma." Cancer Research.

[4] Kumar, S., et al. (2022). "The current landscape of FLT3 inhibitors in AML." Hematology/Oncology Clinics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.