You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Sales Trends for SILENOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Payment Methods and Pharmacy Types for SILENOR (2017)

Revenues by Pharmacy Type

Pharmacy Type Revenues
MAIL-ORDER $19,263,229
DRUG STORE $11,163,432
[disabled in preview] $0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Units Sold by Pharmacy Type

Pharmacy Type Units
MAIL-ORDER 46,740
DRUG STORE 28,078
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Revenues by Payment Method

Payment Method Revenues
MEDICARE $28,044,995
SELF OR FAMILY $2,381,666
[disabled in preview] $0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Drug Sales Revenue Trends for SILENOR
Drug Units Sold Trends for SILENOR

Annual Sales Revenues and Units Sold for SILENOR

These sales figures are drawn from a US national survey of drug expenditures

Market Analysis and Sales Projections for SILENOR (Doxepin)

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

SILENOR (doxepin) is a prescription medication approved by the FDA primarily for treating insomnia characterized by difficulty staying asleep. Market dynamics surrounding SILENOR are influenced by evolving regulatory landscapes, competitive therapies, patent status, and shifts in prescribing behaviors. This analysis explores market size, competitive positioning, regulatory factors, growth drivers, and future sales projections.


Market Landscape for Insomnia Therapeutics

The global sleep disorder market is projected to reach approximately USD 9.4 billion by 2027, with an annual growth rate of 7.2% (CAGR)[1]. Insomnia remains a prevalent condition, affecting nearly 30-35% of adults worldwide, with chronic forms impacting approximately 10-15% of the population[2].

Key Drivers:

  • Rising prevalence of insomnia due to lifestyle, aging populations, and comorbidities.
  • Increased awareness and diagnosis facilitated by advanced diagnostic tools.
  • Growing preference for prescription sleep aids over OTC remedies in moderate-to-severe cases.

Competitive Landscape

SILENOR competes in a crowded market that includes:

  • Prescription sedative-hypnotics: such as zolpidem (Ambien), eszopiclone (Lunesta), and trazodone.
  • Melatonin receptor agonists: like ramelteon.
  • Other tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs): off-label uses of medications similar to doxepin.

While SILENOR's unique position stems from its non-sedating profile at low doses and its status as a scRNA-approved antidepressant with sedative benefits, its market share remains relatively niche due to side effect profiles and stiff competition.

Regulatory and Patent Considerations

Initially approved in 2010 for insomnia, doxepin's patent exclusivity has long since expired. Its prior status as a generic antidepressant complicates branding efforts, although the low-dose formulation as SILENOR retains some market exclusivity via FDA-approved labeling for sleep. Recent litigation and patent expirations have accelerated generic entry, pressuring prices and margins.


Market Penetration and Prescriber Behavior

SILENOR appeals mainly to:

  • Patients intolerant or unresponsive to first-line hypnotics.
  • Patients with contraindications to benzodiazepines or newer agents.
  • Providers seeking alternatives with less dependency potential.

However, prescriber hesitancy persists due to concerns over anticholinergic effects, adverse interactions, and perceived need for more robust clinical data.


Sales Performance and Trends

Historical Sales Data (2018-2022):

  • Post-launch, SILENOR experienced modest growth, with peak sales of approximately USD 50 million in 2015.
  • Subsequent years saw declines attributable to patent expiry and rising generic competition.
  • In 2022, estimated global sales hovered around USD 15 million, representing a significant contraction from peak periods.

Factors Affecting Sales:

  • Entry of generics eroding price premiums.
  • Limited marketing efforts post-patent expiration.
  • Competition from newer, better-tolerated sleep medications.
  • Growing emphasis on behavioral and non-pharmacologic therapies.

Future Sales Projections (2023-2028)

Given the current market trends, SILENOR's sales are projected to remain subdued, with potential stabilization or minor growth driven by niche prescriber segments and emerging evidence supporting its safety profile.

Year Projected Global Sales (USD Millions) Growth (%) Key Assumptions
2023 12–15 -10% to 0 Continued generic competition; limited marketing
2024 13–17 5–10% Increased awareness among psychiatrists and GPs
2025 14–19 7–12% Possible repositioning with new clinical data
2026 15–21 7–11% Slight uptick with expanding formulary access
2027 16–23 7–10% Market saturation limits aggressive growth

Note: These projections reflect cautious estimates assuming no significant new indications or formulations enter the market.


Key Market Influences

  • Generic Competition: Dominance of generic doxepin depresses branded SILENOR's market share.
  • Clinical Positioning: Its niche role limits expansive adoption.
  • Regulatory Developments: Any new labeling or guidelines favoring older antidepressants in sleep management could influence prescribing.
  • Insurance and Reimbursement: Coverage constraints and formulary placement significantly impact utilization rates.

Conclusion

While SILENOR holds a strategically valuable position as a low-dose, sleep-specific formulation of doxepin, its market prospects are constrained by intense generic competition and shifting prescriber preferences. Sales are expected to remain modest, with incremental growth attainable through targeted marketing, clinical education, and potential new indications or formulations. The drug's future viability hinges on repositioning strategies and the evolution of the sleep disorder treatment landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Saturation: SILENOR’s sales are limited by generic competition and physician preference trends favoring newer agents.
  • Growth Opportunity: Niche marketing toward specific patient segments and expanding awareness could provide modest sales upticks.
  • Competitive Threats: Shifting focus toward behavioral therapies and non-pharmacologic interventions may suppress demand.
  • Regulatory Impact: Future approvals or label updates may open or close market segments.
  • Strategic Positioning: Ongoing differentiation as a non-sedating alternative may support stable niche sales.

FAQs

  1. What factors have most impacted SILENOR's sales since its launch?
    Patent expiration, generic competition, and shifting prescriber preferences toward newer sleep agents significantly curtailed SILENOR’s sales.

  2. Are there any upcoming regulatory changes that could influence SILENOR’s market?
    No imminent regulatory changes are currently announced; however, future clinical data or label modifications could alter prescriber confidence.

  3. How does SILENOR compare to other sleep aids in safety and tolerability?
    SILENOR's low-dose formulation offers a non-sedating profile with fewer next-morning residual effects than traditional sedative-hypnotics, appealing to specific patient populations.

  4. What niche markets could SILENOR potentially expand into?
    Potential expansion includes off-label uses in anxiety or depression contexts or within specialized psychiatric or sleep medicine clinics.

  5. What strategic moves could enhance SILENOR’s market position?
    Developing new formulations, conducting comparative clinical trials, or repositioning as part of an integrated insomnia management program could help regain market traction.


References

  1. MarketsandMarkets. Sleep Disorder Therapeutics Market by Disorder, Therapeutics, and Region – Global Forecast to 2027.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Insomnia Fact Sheet.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.