You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Drug Price Trends for SOD SULFACE-SULFUR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for SOD SULFACE-SULFUR

Average Pharmacy Cost for SOD SULFACE-SULFUR

These are average pharmacy acquisition costs (net of discounts) from a US national survey
Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
SOD SULFACE-SULFUR 9-4.5% WASH 82429-0301-21 0.11561 GM 2025-12-17
SOD SULFACE-SULFUR 9-4.5% WASH 42192-0144-16 0.11561 GM 2025-12-17
SOD SULFACE-SULFUR 9-4.5% WASH 58657-0474-16 0.11561 GM 2025-12-17
SOD SULFACE-SULFUR 9-4.5% WASH 82429-0301-21 0.11660 GM 2025-11-19
SOD SULFACE-SULFUR 9-4.5% WASH 42192-0144-16 0.11660 GM 2025-11-19
SOD SULFACE-SULFUR 9-4.5% WASH 58657-0474-16 0.11660 GM 2025-11-19
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Market Analysis and Price Projections for SOD SULFACE-SULFUR

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

SOD SULFACE-SULFUR is a topical dermatological treatment that combines active sulfur compounds with other agents to address skin conditions such as seborrheic dermatitis, acne, psoriasis, and dandruff. Known for its keratolytic and antimicrobial properties, sulfur-based formulations hold a niche but sustained demand in the dermatology pharmaceutical landscape. This analysis evaluates current market dynamics, competitive landscape, unmet needs, regulatory considerations, and offers price projections for SOD SULFACE-SULFUR over the upcoming five-year period.

Market Overview

Current Market Landscape

The global dermatology market is valued at approximately USD 22.8 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.2% through 2027 [1]. Sulfur-based products account for a minor yet significant segment within topical treatments, primarily due to their longstanding history in managing skin ailments. SOD SULFACE-SULFUR, targeting niche conditions like seborrheic dermatitis and psoriasis, leverages sulfur's keratolytic, antimicrobial, and antifungal efficacy.

Epidemiological Drivers

The rise in prevalence of chronic skin conditions fueled by increasing urban pollution, sedentary lifestyles, and lifestyle-related risk factors sustains demand. For instance, seborrheic dermatitis affects up to 5% of the global population, notably higher in immunocompromised and HIV-positive populations [2]. Acne affects over 9% of the global population, making effective topical agents essential.

Market Segments and Geographic Dynamics

North America remains the largest market, driven by robust healthcare infrastructure and awareness. Europe follows, with high prevalence of psoriasis and consumer preference for over-the-counter (OTC) dermatological solutions. Emerging markets—particularly Asia-Pacific—are experiencing rapid growth due to rising disposable income, expanding healthcare access, and increasing dermatological condition awareness.

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors include Johnson & Johnson (Neutrogena), Galderma (Differin), and local OTC brands. While sulfur formulations face competition from antifungals, corticosteroids, and biologics, their safety profile, low cost, and OTC availability sustain their position, especially in non-prescription segments.

Regulatory Environment

The regulatory landscape varies, with the FDA classifying sulfur formulations mainly as OTC drugs, and similar classifications in Europe under the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Stringent regulations on labeling, safety, and efficacy testing influence market entry, especially for new formulations or combinations.

Unmet Needs and Opportunities

Despite the longstanding usage, there is room for innovation in the formulation for enhanced tolerability, stability, and efficacy. Additionally, combining sulfur with other active ingredients like salicylic acid or plant-based agents can cater to consumer preferences for 'natural' or 'holistic' dermatological solutions. Regulatory approval pathways for such novel combinations could unlock new market potential.

Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Increasing prevalence of dermatological conditions
  • Growing consumer preference for OTC and affordable treatments
  • Expansion into emerging markets

Challenges:

  • Competition from newer therapeutic agents (e.g., biologics)
  • Limited efficacy in severe cases
  • Societal perception issues regarding smell and staining associated with sulfur

Price Analysis and Projections

Historical Pricing Trends

Historically, sulfur-based topical formulations have been priced modestly, primarily due to their generic nature and widespread OTC status. Prices have ranged from USD 3 to USD 12 per package, depending on concentration, formulation, and branding.

Cost Factors Impacting Pricing

  • Raw Material Costs: Sulfur is inexpensive; however, purity and formulation enhancements increase costs.
  • Regulatory and Development Costs: New formulations or combinations can incur significant R&D expenses.
  • Marketing & Distribution: Brand recognition and distribution channels significantly influence consumer pricing.

Projected Price Trends (2023–2028)

Based on industry trends, competitive positioning, and inflation adjustments, the following projections are made:

Year Estimated Price Range (USD) per package Notes
2023 3.50 – 7.00 Entry-level OTC products, stable market
2024 3.75 – 7.25 Slight increase due to inflation
2025 4.00 – 8.00 Introduction of premium formulations
2026 4.25 – 8.50 Market expansion, brand differentiation
2027 4.50 – 9.00 Increased manufacturing costs, innovation
2028 4.75 – 9.50 Potential for personalized formulations

Pricing Strategies

  • Generic Competition: Keeps prices near the lower end of the spectrum.
  • Branding & Differentiation: Premium pricing might be achievable for specialized or combination therapies.
  • Geographic Pricing Variations: In emerging markets, pricing could be 30-50% lower due to lower purchasing power.

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Companies: Opportunity exists to develop novel sulfur formulations with improved tolerability and efficacy, potentially commanding higher prices.

Distributors & Retailers: Stable demand emphasizes the importance of OTC shelf space, with margins influenced by branding.

Healthcare Providers: Continued recommendation for mild to moderate dermatological conditions sustains demand, but clinicians may prefer newer agents for severe cases.

Consumers: Price sensitivity remains high; affordability and perceived efficacy drive purchasing decisions.

Conclusion

SOD SULFACE-SULFUR occupies a stable niche marked by longstanding consumer acceptance and broad applicability for mild to moderate skin conditions. The global dermatology market’s projected growth and emerging markets’ expansion forecast a gradual increase in product pricing, aligned with inflation, formulation innovations, and regulatory compliance. While sulfur-based products face competitive challenges, their affordability, safety profile, and OTC availability sustain their market presence. Strategic investments in formulation innovation and regional expansion can further bolster their market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Stability: SOD SULFACE-SULFUR continues to serve a consistent demand segment within dermatology, primarily driven by affordability and safety.
  • Pricing Outlook: Expect a gradual rise in retail prices, averaging a 35-40% increase over five years, contingent on formulation enhancements and market expansion.
  • Opportunities: Innovation in formulations, including combining sulfur with natural ingredients or other actives, could command premium pricing.
  • Geographical Growth: Emerging markets offer significant growth potential, with tailored pricing strategies needed.
  • Regulatory Navigation: Ensuring compliance will continue to influence pricing and market entry strategies, especially in new regions.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary dermatological conditions treated with SOD SULFACE-SULFUR?
    It is mainly used for seborrheic dermatitis, acne, psoriasis, and dandruff, leveraging sulfur’s keratolytic and antimicrobial properties.

  2. How does the pricing of SOD SULFACE-SULFUR compare internationally?
    Prices are generally lower in emerging markets due to economic factors, with stabilized or increased pricing in developed countries driven by branding and formulation quality.

  3. What are the main competitive threats to sulfur-based topical treatments?
    Competition includes newer antifungal, corticosteroid, and biologic therapies, especially for severe or resistant conditions, though sulfur formulations maintain a cost advantage for mild to moderate cases.

  4. Are there regulatory challenges for new sulfur formulations?
    Yes. Regulatory approval requires demonstrating safety and efficacy, with OTC classifications in many regions simplifying market entry but imposing strict labeling standards.

  5. What innovations could impact future pricing of sulfur-based products?
    Combining sulfur with other active ingredients, developing longer-acting formulations, or creating natural/holistic variants could justify premium pricing and expand market share.


References

[1] Grand View Research, “Dermatology Market Size & Trends,” 2022.
[2] National Institutes of Health, “Epidemiology of Seborrheic Dermatitis,” 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.