You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Monoamine Oxidase Type B Inhibitor Drug Class List


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs in Drug Class: Monoamine Oxidase Type B Inhibitor

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bausch ZELAPAR selegiline hydrochloride TABLET, ORALLY DISINTEGRATING;ORAL 021479-001 Jun 14, 2006 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate TABLET;ORAL 207145-002 Mar 21, 2017 AB RX Yes Yes 8,283,380 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate TABLET;ORAL 207145-002 Mar 21, 2017 AB RX Yes Yes 8,076,515 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate TABLET;ORAL 207145-001 Mar 21, 2017 AB RX Yes No 8,076,515 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Monoamine Oxidase Type B Inhibitors

Last updated: August 17, 2025

Introduction

Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors represent a crucial class of drugs primarily used in the management of Parkinson’s disease and, to a lesser extent, depression. Their mechanism involves selectively inhibiting the MAO-B enzyme, thereby increasing dopaminergic activity in the brain. As the global Parkinson's disease patient population expands—projected to reach over 12 million by 2040[1]—the market for MAO-B inhibitors exhibits significant growth potential. This analysis explores the current market dynamics, the evolving patent landscape, and strategic considerations for stakeholders in this therapeutic area.


Market Overview

Demand Drivers

The escalating prevalence of Parkinson’s disease (PD), aging populations, and the unmet need for effective symptomatic treatments underpin the increasing demand for MAO-B inhibitors. The unmet clinical need remains significant: existing therapies primarily focus on symptom management, with limited options to modify disease progression. Innovative formulations and combination therapies featuring MAO-B inhibitors, such as safinamide and rasagiline, further bolster market growth.

Current Market Leaders

Rasagiline (Azilect®) by Teva and Selegiline remain the most well-established MAO-B inhibitors. Rasagiline gained approval in 2006 and is marketed globally, supported by data indicating neuroprotective potential[2]. Safinamide (Xadago®), approved in 2017 in the US and other markets, offers dual mechanisms—reversible MAO-B inhibition and glutamate modulation—expanding treatment options[3].

Emerging Competitors and Pipeline Drugs

Recently, drug developers are exploring next-generation MAO-B inhibitors with improved selectivity, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles. Pipeline candidates aim to address limitations of current therapies, such as side effects like hypertension or interactions with dietary tyramine.


Market Dynamics

Therapeutic Innovations and Formulation Developments

The drive toward combination therapies involving MAO-B inhibitors is notable. Fixed-dose combinations with levodopa enhance patient adherence and optimize symptomatic control[4]. Moreover, formulations that improve BBB penetration, extend half-life, or enable controlled release are under clinical investigation.

Regulatory Environment

Regulatory agencies have shown openness to approving novel MAO-B inhibitors, especially those demonstrating neuroprotective benefits beyond symptomatic relief. Stringent safety evaluations concerning hypertensive crises and serotonergic interactions guide approval processes.

Pricing and Reimbursement Landscape

Pricing strategies for MAO-B inhibitors vary globally, influenced by patent status, competitive dynamics, and healthcare system policies. Patent protections enable premium pricing initially, but exposure to biosimilars and generics often reduces costs downstream. Reimbursement policies favor drugs with demonstrated efficacy and safety, further influencing market uptake.

Market Challenges

Key challenges include adverse effects management, drug-drug interactions, and the limited disease-modifying capabilities of current MAO-B inhibitors. Additionally, patent expirations threaten exclusivity, prompting investments into novel molecules or formulations.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Duration and Expiry Trends

Most patents protecting rasagiline and safinamide are set to expire between 2023 and 2030[5]. Patent portfolios typically encompass composition of matter, method of use, and manufacturing process claims. For example, Teva's rasagiline patents have begun to expire, opening avenues for generic manufacturers to enter markets globally.

Innovative Patents and Evergreening Practices

Companies pursue secondary patents covering new formulations, new therapeutic indications, or specific use methods. For instance, reformulations such as extended-release or transdermal patches are subject to patent applications that can prolong market exclusivity[6].

Major Patent Holders

Teva, UCB (through safinamide), and Merz are dominant players holding core patents. Biotech firms and academic institutions also seek patent protection for novel MAO-B inhibitors with unique binding profiles or dual mechanisms.

Impact of Patent Expirations

Patent expirations catalyze generic entry, intensify price competition, and reshape market shares. For instance, the anticipated patent expiry of rasagiline propels generic manufacturers to accelerate development of biosimilars and formulations with patent-protected advantages.

Legal and Policy Trends

Patent litigation and patent term extensions continue to influence the landscape. Regulatory policies allowing supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe enable patent extensions up to 5 years, fostering longer market exclusivity[7].


Strategic Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: Focus on developing neuroprotective agents with disease-modifying potentials, leveraging patent protections around novel targets or combination therapies.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Prepare for imminent patent expiries by developing cost-effective biosimilars and exploring alternative formulations to sustain market share.

  • Investors and Business Development: Strategically evaluate pipeline compounds with differentiated mechanisms or formulations that may command premium pricing and longer exclusivity.

  • Regulatory Bodies: Foster pathways for accelerated approval of innovative drugs with clear clinical benefits, balancing safety and efficacy.


Conclusion

The MAO-B inhibitor segment remains vital in Parkinson's disease management, with evolving market dynamics driven by clinical innovation, regulatory developments, and patent activities. As patents expire, the landscape is poised for increased generic competition, compelling original manufacturers to innovate through formulations and combination therapies. Ongoing research into disease-modifying properties promises to reshape the therapeutic pipeline, offering opportunities for growth and differentiation.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Growth: Driven by increasing Parkinson’s prevalence, aging populations, and demand for symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies.

  • Patent Landscape: Core patents for rasagiline and safinamide expire between 2023-2030, paving the way for generic entry; secondary patents aim to extend exclusivity through formulations and indications.

  • Innovative Strategies: Companies focus on developing novel formulations, combination therapies, and drugs with neuroprotective properties to differentiate in a competitive landscape.

  • Regulatory Trends: Opportunities for accelerated approval and patent extensions exist, particularly for drugs demonstrating additional benefits.

  • Challenges: Managing safety profiles, patent expiries, and competition requires strategic innovation and robust pipeline development.


FAQs

1. What are the leading MAO-B inhibitors currently on the market?
Rasagiline (Azilect®) and safinamide (Xadago®) are the primary approved MAO-B inhibitors, used for symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease.

2. When do patents for rasagiline and safinamide expire?
Most patents for rasagiline are set to expire between 2023-2025, while safinamide patents are protected until approximately 2028-2030, depending on jurisdiction and specific patent protections.

3. How do patent expirations impact the market for MAO-B inhibitors?
Patent expirations open markets to cheaper generic versions, intensify price competition, and necessitate continued innovation for branded products to maintain market share.

4. What are the future trends in MAO-B inhibitor development?
Future trends include designing drugs with neuroprotective properties, developing novel delivery systems (transdermal, extended-release), and combining therapies to improve efficacy.

5. Are there ongoing clinical trials for new MAO-B inhibitors?
Yes, several pipeline candidates are in clinical phases, focusing on enhanced selectivity, safety, and neuroprotective effects, signaling continued innovation in this class.


References:

  1. Parkinson’s Foundation. Parkinson’s Disease Statistics. 2022.
  2. Finberg, J.P., & Rabey, J.M. (2016). The Role of Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease. CNS Drugs.
  3. European Medicines Agency. Xadago (Safinamide). 2017.
  4. Schapira, A.H. (2011). Combination therapies in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord.
  5. PatentScope. (2022). Data on rasagiline and safinamide patent protections.
  6. Lutter, D., et al. (2018). Patent strategies in neurodegenerative therapies. J Pharm Innov.
  7. European Patent Office. (2022). SPC Regulations and extensions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.