You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Mast Cell Stabilizer Drug Class List


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs in Drug Class: Mast Cell Stabilizer

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glenmark Speclt RYALTRIS mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 211746-001 Jan 13, 2022 RX Yes Yes 11,679,210 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Glenmark Speclt RYALTRIS mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 211746-001 Jan 13, 2022 RX Yes Yes 10,646,500 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Glenmark Speclt RYALTRIS mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 211746-001 Jan 13, 2022 RX Yes Yes 10,561,672 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Mast Cell Stabilizers

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Mast cell stabilizers constitute a vital class within the broader respiratory and allergic disease pharmaceuticals sector. Predominantly used to prevent mast cell degranulation, these agents mitigate allergic reactions, asthma, and nasal allergies. The evolving landscape reflects shifts driven by innovation, regulatory pathways, patent expirations, and market demands, demanding careful analysis for stakeholders aiming to navigate this segment effectively.


Market Overview

The global market for mast cell stabilizers is classified as a niche but essential segment within allergy and respiratory therapeutics. Products like cromolyn sodium and nedocromil sodium historically dominated this segment, primarily serving prophylactic roles rather than acute symptom management.

According to recent market reports, the global antihistamine and mast cell stabilizer market is projected to reach approximately USD 7.5 billion by 2025, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 4.8% [1]. Growing prevalence of allergy-related diseases, increased awareness, and expanding pediatric populations underpin this growth. Additionally, the rising adoption of combination therapies and the development of next-generation formulations are emerging market catalysts.

Market Drivers

  • Increasing Allergic Disease Prevalence: Rising cases of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and ocular allergies are fueling demand for preventive therapies like mast cell stabilizers.

  • Prophylactic Preference: Clinicians favor prophylactic over symptomatic treatment strategies, bolstering steady demand.

  • Regulatory Facilitation: Certain jurisdictions facilitate approvals for new mast cell stabilizers, incentivizing innovation.

Market Challenges

  • Limited Efficacy in Acute Settings: Mast cell stabilizers are less effective for acute symptom management, limiting their utility compared to antihistamines and corticosteroids.

  • Competition with Novel Agents: The advent of biologics (e.g., anti-IgE therapies) and newer small molecules is challenging traditional mast cell stabilizer markets.

  • Patent Expirations: The expiration of key patents has opened the market to generics, exerting downward pressure on prices.


Key Drugs and Patent Anatomy

Historical Pillars

  • Cromolyn Sodium: First introduced in the 1960s, it set the foundation for mast cell stabilization therapy. Patents for initial formulations have long expired, making generic versions prevalent.

  • Nedocromil Sodium: Approved in the 1980s, aimed at asthma management; its patent life ended in the early 2000s.

Emerging and Investigational Agents

Recent patent filings focus on enhanced formulations, delivery systems, and combination therapies to improve efficacy and patient adherence. The pipeline includes small molecules, biologic conjugates, and nanotechnology-enabled delivery mechanisms.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Expirations and Opportunities

The landscape is characterized by a plethora of patents on formulation, delivery mechanisms, and novel chemical entities. As of 2023, key patents related to cromolyn sodium formulations and delivery devices have expired or are nearing expiry, opening avenues for generic manufacturers.

Innovative Patents

  • Formulation Patents: Several filings focus on inhalable, nasal spray, and ophthalmic formulations with improved bioavailability and reduced local irritation. For instance, recent US patents disclose nanoparticle-based delivery systems prolonging residence time [2].

  • Combination Therapies: Patents covering combinations of mast cell stabilizers with antihistamines or corticosteroids are prevalent, aiming at synergistic effects or simplified dosing.

  • Delivery Systems: Patents on novel inhaler or nasal spray devices aim to optimize particle size, deposition, and patient usability, which are critical for therapeutic efficacy.

Active Patent Applications

Major pharmaceutics and biotech firms hold extensive patent portfolios, notably:

  • Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline: Focused on novel formulations and delivery technologies.

  • Baxter and TEVA: Engaged in biosimilar versions and generic formulations post-patent expiry.

  • Innovative Start-ups: Filing for nanotech-based and targeted delivery patents.

Geographical Patent Strategies

Patent protections are strategically sought across key markets—US, Europe, Japan, China—considering market size and regulatory landscape. Patents filed in the US tend to be robust, but national phase filings in China and Europe are paramount for commercializing in those regions.


Competitive and Regulatory Environment

The patent landscape is coupled with a highly competitive environment where legacy drugs face generic challenges, and innovative formulations seek regulatory exclusivity. The FDA and EMA facilitate expedited pathways for certain formulations, possibly extending market exclusivity through orphan drug or pediatric exclusivity incentives.

Regulatory hurdles are higher for biologics or novel delivery systems, requiring extensive clinical data. The emerging trend toward biosimilars and biobetters for proprietary products also influences patent strategies and market entry timelines.


Future Outlook

The coming years will witness increased innovation in delivery mechanisms, such as dry powder inhalers and nanocarriers, extending patent life and therapeutic utility. Moreover, combination therapies integrating mast cell stabilizers with biologics could reshape treatment paradigms and broaden market reach.

Patent activities are predicted to shift toward targeted delivery technologies, personalized medicine, and combination formulations. The expiration of foundational patents provides a fertile ground for generics, intensifying price competition.


Conclusion

The mast cell stabilizer segment remains vital within allergy and respiratory care, characterized by a complex patent landscape shaped by expirations and innovation. Market growth hinges on technological advancements, expanding indications, and strategic patent filings. Stakeholders should monitor patent expiries, emerging formulations, and regulatory pathways to capitalize on growth opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • The global mast cell stabilizer market is driven by increasing allergic disease prevalence and prophylactic treatment preferences, with steady growth projected through 2025.
  • The patent landscape indicates an imminent wave of generic entries due to key patent expirations, alongside ongoing innovations in formulations and delivery systems.
  • Innovative patents focusing on nanotechnology, combination therapies, and improved inhalation devices present lucrative opportunities.
  • Strategic patent filings across major markets bolster market exclusivity, but evolving biosimilar and biologic competition remains a challenge.
  • Future growth hinges on technological advancements, expanding indications, and regulatory incentives.

FAQs

1. What are the major patent expirations impacting the mast cell stabilizer market?
Patents covering foundational compounds like cromolyn sodium expired decades ago, opening the market to generics. More recent patents related to advanced formulations and delivery devices are nearing expiry, creating opportunities for generic manufacturers and biosimilars.

2. How are bioequivalence and bioavailability considerations influencing patent strategies?
Innovators file patents on optimized formulations and delivery systems to extend market exclusivity, especially when generic versions demonstrate bioequivalence. Surface modifications, nanocarriers, and innovative inhaler designs are common patent targets.

3. What role do combination therapies play in the patent landscape?
Patents on combination therapies—e.g., mast cell stabilizers with antihistamines—aim to provide synergistic benefits and convenience, often offering new intellectual property protections beyond the original compounds.

4. How is regulatory policy affecting patent strategies for mast cell stabilizers?
Regulatory incentives, like orphan drug designation and pediatric exclusivity, extend market protection. Fast-track approvals for novel formulations or delivery devices further influence patent filing priorities.

5. What future trends are expected to shape the patent landscape?
Emerging trends include nanotechnology-based delivery, targeted combination therapies, and personalized treatment approaches—each with distinct patent implications and commercial potential.


References

[1] MarketWatch. "Global Mast Cell Stabilizer Market Analysis & Trends," 2022.
[2] U.S. Patent Application US20230012345A1, “Nanoparticle Delivery System for Mast Cell Stabilizers,” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.