You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Cytoprotective Agent Drug Class List


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs in Drug Class: Cytoprotective Agent

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Baxter Hlthcare MESNEX mesna INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019884-001 Dec 30, 1988 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Baxter Hlthcare MESNEX mesna TABLET;ORAL 020855-001 Mar 21, 2002 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novast Labs MESNA mesna TABLET;ORAL 218871-001 Jan 13, 2025 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Hikma MESNA mesna INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 075739-001 Jan 9, 2004 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Fresenius Kabi Usa MESNA mesna INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 075811-001 Apr 26, 2001 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Gland MESNA mesna INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 206992-001 Dec 18, 2017 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sagent Pharms Inc MESNA mesna INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 090913-001 Apr 13, 2010 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Drugs in the Cytoprotective Agent Class

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Cytoprotective agents serve a pivotal role in safeguarding cells from damage induced by toxins, chemotherapeutic agents, radiation, and oxidative stress. Their applications span oncology, nephrology, cardiology, and neurology, with an expanding pipeline driven by advancements in molecular biology and personalized medicine. An understanding of the market dynamics and patent landscape is essential for pharmaceutical companies, investors, and stakeholders aiming to capitalize on emerging opportunities or mitigate competitive risks within this niche.


Market Overview and Trends

The global cytoprotective agents market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 6-8% through 2028, fueled by the rising prevalence of cancer, degenerative diseases, and the need for supportive therapies in chemotherapy regimens [1]. Major growth drivers include:

  • Increasing Oncology Treatment Demand: Chemotherapy-induced toxicity remains a significant hurdle, creating a persistent need for cytoprotective agents like amifostine, which mitigate side effects such as nephrotoxicity and mucositis [2].
  • Expanding Therapeutic Applications: Emerging research supports the role of cytoprotective agents in neuroprotection and cardiovascular protection, broadening clinical use cases [3].
  • Regulatory Advances: Favorable regulatory pathways and accelerated approvals for novel cytoprotective drugs are incentivizing innovation.

Conversely, challenges include regulatory scrutiny over safety profiles—particularly in the context of chemoprotection, where interference with antitumor efficacy is a concern—and high R&D costs.


Market Segmentation and Key Players

The primary classes within cytoprotective drugs include:

  • Antioxidants (e.g., N-acetylcysteine, melatonin):used in radiation therapy side effect management and neuroprotection.
  • Enzyme-based Agents (e.g., dexrazoxane): mainly for cardioprotection against anthracycline toxicity.
  • Synthetic and Biological Agents: including amifostine, a leading agent with FDA approval for multiple indications.

Major pharmaceutical companies dominating this space encompass:

  • Baxter International: with its developed formulations like amifostine.
  • Sanofi: involved in the development of dexrazoxane.
  • Pfizer: invested in supportive care agents targeting various cytoprotective pathways.
  • Emerging biotech firms: focusing on targeted molecular agents with bespoke cytoprotective mechanisms.

The competitive landscape is intensifying with the advent of novel agents exploring mitochondrial protection, gene therapy adjuncts, and immune-modulating cytoprotectants.


Regulatory Pathways and Market Entry Barriers

Approval for cytoprotective drugs hinges on demonstrating efficacy in mitigating toxicity without compromising disease treatment outcomes. Regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA are increasingly scrutinizing safety profiles, which influences the pace of approval.

Barriers include:

  • Safety Concerns: adverse events such as hypotension with amifostine or hematologic complications with dexrazoxane.
  • Efficacy Demonstration: require robust clinical data linking cytoprotection to improved patient outcomes.
  • Patent Lifespan and Exclusivity: While key drugs like amifostine are off-patent, newer agents benefit from patent protection, influencing market competition.

Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape for cytoprotective agents reveals a complex picture characterized by:

Established Patents

  • Amifostine: Originally patented in the 1980s, its patent expired in the early 2000s [4]. Nonetheless, formulations and combination patents have sustained market exclusivity temporarily.
  • Dexrazoxane: Patented in the 1980s, with patent expiry in the 2000s, leading to generic manufacturing.

Emerging Patents

Recent filings focus on:

  • Novel Molecular Entities: Small molecules targeting oxidative stress pathways, mitochondrial integrity, and apoptosis regulation.
  • Formulation Patents: Enhanced drug delivery systems, such as liposomal or nanoparticle-based formulations, to improve bioavailability and reduce side effects [5].
  • Method of Use Patents: Claims covering combination therapies, dosing regimens, and specific indications, aiming to extend market exclusivity.

Patent Challenges

  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents create legal intricacies, complicating generic entry.
  • Infringement Risks: The broad scope of some patents invites litigation, notably around formulations and combination therapies.
  • Evergreening Strategies: Minor modifications seeking patent extensions have become common, delaying generic competition.

Emerging Innovations and R&D Focus

Research efforts concentrate on:

  • Mitochondria-Targeted Protectants: e.g., SS-31 peptides aimed at reducing oxidative damage.
  • Gene Therapy Adjuncts: Enhancing cellular resilience at the genetic level.
  • Biologic Cytoprotectants: Monoclonal antibodies and biologics to modulate cellular pathways involved in stress responses.

These innovations are accompanied by new patent filings, reflecting a dynamic landscape predisposed to disruption, particularly as precision medicine evolves.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Need to navigate patent expirations and seek strategic patent filings around novel mechanisms.
  • Investors and VC Firms: Should monitor emerging patent filings and clinical trial trajectories to identify high-value assets.
  • Regulatory Bodies: Must balance safety concerns with fostering innovation, especially for biosimilar or generic versions.
  • Healthcare Providers: Require ongoing education on evolving indications, safety, and reimbursement policies.

Conclusion

The cytoprotective agent market is characterized by mature drugs facing increasing competition from a pipeline of emerging innovations. Patent landscapes are complex, with a mix of expired, pending, and filed patents shaping access and exclusivity. Market growth hinges on successful clinical validation, regulatory approval, and strategic patent management. Technological advances in molecular pharmacology and formulation science promise to extend therapeutic options and market opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Rapidly expanding use cases across oncology, neurology, and cardiology drive growth in the cytoprotective agents market.
  • Key patents for foundational drugs like amifostine and dexrazoxane have expired, but strategic patent filings for new delivery systems, formulations, and combinations maintain competitive barriers.
  • Innovation focus areas include mitochondrial protection, gene therapy adjuncts, and biologics, with strong patent activity underpinning future market shifts.
  • Regulatory scrutiny emphasizes safety and efficacy, influencing patent strategies and clinical development plans.
  • Stakeholders must stay vigilant of patent expirations, emerging filings, and clinical trial outcomes to optimize decision-making.

FAQs

1. What are the main therapeutic indications for cytoprotective agents?
Primarily, they are used to mitigate toxicity from chemotherapeutic agents like cisplatin and anthracyclines, as well as to protect tissues against radiation, oxidative stress, and ischemic injury.

2. How does patent expiration impact the availability of cytoprotective drugs?
Patent expiration typically leads to increased generic availability, reducing costs but also diminishing incentives for innovation. However, formulation patents or new indications can still provide exclusivity.

3. Which companies are leading innovation in the cytoprotective agent class?
While Baxter and Sanofi hold significant historical relevance, emerging biotech firms focusing on mitochondrial and biologic protectants are at the forefront of innovation.

4. What challenges do firms face when patenting novel cytoprotective agents?
Key challenges include demonstrating safety and efficacy, navigating complex patent landscapes, avoiding infringement, and ensuring commercial viability amid high R&D costs.

5. What future trends will shape the cytoprotective agent market?
Personalized medicine approaches, combination therapies, and biologic innovations will likely define the next wave of patent filings and market expansion.


References

[1] Market Research Future. "Cytoprotective Agents Market Forecast to 2028." 2022.
[2] National Cancer Institute. "Supportive Care in Cancer." 2021.
[3] Zhang, et al., "Emerging Cytoprotective Strategies in Neurology," Neuroscience Letters, 2020.
[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. "Patent Expiry Database," 2021.
[5] Smith, J., "Advances in Drug Delivery for Cytoprotective Agents," J Pharm Sci, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.