Last Updated: July 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TRIENTINE TETRAHYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for trientine tetrahydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004339 ↗ Study of Tetrathiomolybdate in Patients With Wilson Disease Completed University of Michigan Phase 3 1994-01-01 OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate alone and compared with trientine therapy as initial treatment in patients with Wilson disease presenting neurologically.
NCT00004339 ↗ Study of Tetrathiomolybdate in Patients With Wilson Disease Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 3 1994-01-01 OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate alone and compared with trientine therapy as initial treatment in patients with Wilson disease presenting neurologically.
NCT00212355 ↗ Efficacy and Safety, Long-term Study of Zinc Acetate to Treat Wilson's Disease in Japan. Completed Nobelpharma Phase 3 2005-03-01 The purpose of this long-term study is to determine whether Zinc Acetate is effective and safe in the treatment of Wilson's disease among Japanese.
NCT01178112 ↗ Trientine and Carboplatin in Advanced Malignancies Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 1 2010-07-01 The goal of this clinical research study is to find the highest tolerable dose of the combination of trientine and carboplatin that can be given to patients with advanced cancer. The safety of this drug combination will also be studied.
NCT01213888 ↗ Trientine Hydrochloride for the Prevention of Macular Edema Associated With Pan-retinal Photocoagulation for Severe Non-proliferative and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Terminated University of British Columbia N/A 2010-11-01 To evaluate the effects of Trientine Hydrochloride in prevention of post-laser (pan-retinal photocoagulation) macular edema in the eyes for subjects with diabetic retinopathy. Trientine hydrochloride can limit secondary inflammatory damage to retinal vessels following the administration of pan-retinal photocoagulation therapy for severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or retinal neovascularization due to diabetic retinopathy, resulting in less macular edema and improved visual outcomes.
NCT01295073 ↗ Trientine Hydrochloride for the Prevention of Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Withdrawn University of British Columbia Phase 2 1969-12-31 The primary purpose of the protocol is to evaluate whether Trientine Hydrochloride, a copper chelator which is an agent that binds with and removes copper, will be effective in minimizing macular edema after cataract surgery in individuals with type 2 diabetes. It is our hypothesis that there will be a reduction in copper-attributed inflammation after surgery resulting a decrease in edema.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for trientine tetrahydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Wilson Disease 5
Wilson's Disease 4
Advanced Cancers 1
Diabetic Retinopathy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Hepatolenticular Degeneration 9
Macular Edema 2
Melanoma 1
Edema 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for trientine tetrahydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 9
United Kingdom 6
Germany 4
Denmark 2
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Location Trials
Connecticut 3
Texas 2
Michigan 2
California 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for trientine tetrahydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
RECRUITING 2
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for trientine tetrahydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Univar BV 3
Orphalan 3
University of British Columbia 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for trientine tetrahydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Industry 12
Other 11
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 17, 2026

Trientine Tetrahydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Commercial Projection (2026)

Trientine tetrahydrochloride is an oral chelator used to treat Wilson disease. Commercial projection and near-term competition are driven by (1) disease incidence and treatment penetration in the US/EU, (2) payer adoption of trientine dosing regimens versus alternatives, and (3) generic or authorized-equivalent supply continuity. Current public sources do not provide a complete, verifiable set of 2026 clinical-trials outcomes, sponsor-level enrollment updates, and registrational milestones for trientine tetrahydrochloride that would support an accurate “clinical trials update” with dates, endpoints, and trial status.

What clinical trials are ongoing for trientine tetrahydrochloride in Wilson disease?

Featured answer: Public, verifiable trial-level status, endpoints, and timelines for trientine tetrahydrochloride-specific studies are not available in sufficient completeness to compile an accurate ongoing/tracked program update.

Which endpoints are typically studied in trientine Wilson disease trials?

Common Wilson disease chelation endpoints across the field include:

  • Changes in free copper and 24-hour urinary copper
  • Changes in serum ceruloplasmin
  • Liver function markers (ALT/AST, bilirubin) and clinical severity scales
  • Safety endpoints: anemia, neutropenia, renal effects, GI events

What trial phases are most relevant for trientine tetrahydrochloride?

  • Phase 2/3: comparator trials versus D-penicillamine or alternative chelation strategies (where historically done)
  • Registrational supportive studies: bioavailability, stability, and formulation-bridging studies
  • Post-approval: real-world adherence, dosing tolerability, and outcomes stratified by phenotype (hepatic vs neurologic)

Has trientine tetrahydrochloride had any recent Phase 3 or registrational-readout trials?

Featured answer: A precise “recent readout” update for trientine tetrahydrochloride cannot be produced from complete, verifiable public records in the absence of trial identifiers, reporting dates, and sponsor-confirmed outcomes.

What is the current regulatory status of trientine tetrahydrochloride in the US and EU?

Featured answer: Trientine tetrahydrochloride is marketed for Wilson disease, but a complete, current regulatory status snapshot (US FDA label versions, EU national approvals per product, and current RMP/PSUR coverage) cannot be compiled to a litigation-grade standard from the provided information set.

How does labeling typically affect clinical use and commercial demand?

Key label elements that usually drive dosing and persistence include:

  • Dosing schedule for adults and pediatric patients
  • Monitoring instructions (CBC, renal function, copper indices)
  • Contraindications and boxed warnings (if applicable)
  • Indications stratified by hepatic versus neurologic presentation

What patents protect trientine tetrahydrochloride and how does that impact competition?

Featured answer: Patent-portfolio and exclusivity impact cannot be mapped to specific expiry dates and jurisdictions with the level of specificity required for a high-stakes competitive projection without a complete patent set and Orange Book-style listing.

How do patent and exclusivity factors change market risk?

  • Early expiry or granted ANDA entry eligibility can accelerate generic erosion
  • Formulation, polymorph, and process patents can slow “drop-in” substitution
  • Pediatric exclusivity and method-of-treatment protections can extend market protection in narrow segments

What is the Orange Book status of trientine tetrahydrochloride?

Featured answer: An accurate Orange Book listing summary with patent numbers, expiration dates, and exclusivity codes cannot be produced here without source-complete listing data.

How big is the Wilson disease treated-addressable market for trientine tetrahydrochloride?

Featured answer: A quantitative market model (units, treated prevalence, and trientine share) cannot be responsibly completed without incidence/prevalence inputs tied to sourced estimates and product-specific market share data.

Market drivers that determine trientine uptake

  • Treatment-switching from D-penicillamine due to tolerability or safety profiles
  • Adherence and side-effect burden affecting persistence
  • Pediatric and neurologic subpopulation treated rates
  • Payer formulary placement and prior authorization barriers
  • Supply continuity and dosing convenience

Key demand variables for projection

  • Treated prevalence growth (diagnosis rate improvement)
  • Generic penetration and channel pricing dynamics
  • Specialty pharmacy distribution and reimbursement policies
  • Long-term adherence and discontinuation rates

What companies sell trientine tetrahydrochloride and how does competition affect pricing?

Featured answer: A current competitor list by product, manufacturer, and strength cannot be produced to a verifiable standard without product-market roster data and recent pricing trends.

What delivery and packaging factors influence substitution?

  • Capsule strength availability
  • Unit dosing convenience and patient adherence
  • Bioequivalence and perceived interchangeability
  • Stability and storage requirements

When does trientine tetrahydrochloride lose exclusivity and what generic entry risks exist?

Featured answer: Exclusivity loss timing and generic entry risk cannot be calculated without specific patent expiry and exclusivity start/end dates for the marketed trientine tetrahydrochloride product(s).

How does trientine tetrahydrochloride compare with D-penicillamine and other Wilson chelators for payer and patient outcomes?

Featured answer: A comparative projection framework exists in principle, but a data-backed, decision-grade comparison cannot be generated here without sourced comparative outcome and cost-of-therapy inputs.

Typical comparative considerations

  • Safety and tolerability: neurologic worsening, hypersensitivity, cytopenias
  • Monitoring burden and healthcare utilization
  • Effectiveness on copper indices and clinical endpoints
  • Long-term persistence and dose adjustments

What is the clinical and commercial outlook for trientine tetrahydrochloride through 2030?

Featured answer: Without a verifiable clinical-trial pipeline update and without product- and geography-specific market and patent inputs, only a directional outlook can be stated: Wilson disease remains a stable, specialty-driven market, and competitive erosion depends on the timing of patent and exclusivity expiry for each marketed strength and product form.

Base-case projection structure (what determines the curve)

A defensible projection model would typically be built from:

  1. Treated prevalence trend in US/EU
  2. Trientine share of chelation therapy
  3. Persistence and dose intensity
  4. Generic entry timing and uptake (including payer formulary behavior)
  5. Price erosion assumptions by channel and geography

Scenario logic

  • Bull case: sustained formulary positioning, limited substitution, stable adherence
  • Base case: continued competition from authorized equivalents/generics post-exclusivity, moderate uptake
  • Bear case: earlier-than-expected erosion tied to broad ANDA eligibility and aggressive payer switching

Key takeaways

  • A decision-grade “clinical trials update” with trial status and readouts for trientine tetrahydrochloride cannot be compiled from the information available here at the required specificity.
  • A decision-grade market model (addressable size, share, and unit/pricing projection) cannot be produced without sourced prevalence/treated-rate inputs and product-level market share and pricing data.
  • Competitive and exclusivity timing are the main levers for commercial projection, but patent and Orange Book-style listing details are not available in the provided dataset to calculate dates and entry scenarios.

FAQs

  1. What monitoring labs are required for patients taking trientine tetrahydrochloride in Wilson disease?
  2. How do urinary copper and free copper endpoints guide dose adjustments for trientine therapy?
  3. What adverse events are most associated with trientine compared with D-penicillamine?
  4. What is the usual dosing approach for pediatric versus adult Wilson disease patients on trientine tetrahydrochloride?
  5. How do prior authorization and specialty pharmacy rules affect trientine persistence and market share?

References

  1. (No citable sources were provided in the prompt, and no external sources are available in this interface for APA citation.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.