You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IVACAFTOR; LUMACAFTOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ivacaftor; lumacaftor

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01225211 ↗ Study of VX-809 Alone and in Combination With VX-770 in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Patients Homozygous or Heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR Mutation Completed Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Phase 2 2010-10-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate of the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of lumacaftor (VX-809) alone and when coadministered with ivacaftor (VX-770) in participants with cystic fibrosis, homozygous or heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation.
NCT01768663 ↗ A Phase 1 Study to Examine the Drug-Drug Interaction of Ciprofloxacin, Itraconazole, and Rifampin on the Combination of Lumacaftor With Ivacaftor in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Phase 1 2013-01-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the drug-drug interaction effects of ciprofloxacin, itraconazole, and rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of lumacaftor in combination with ivacaftor as well as to evaluate the potential effects of lumacaftor in combination with ivacaftor on lung function.
NCT01807923 ↗ A Study of Lumacaftor in Combination With Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis Subjects Aged 12 Years and Older Who Are Homozygous for the F508del-CFTR Mutation Completed Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Phase 3 2013-05-01 The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of lumacaftor in combination with ivacaftor at Week 24 in participants aged 12 years and older with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are homozygous for the F508del mutation on the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ivacaftor; lumacaftor

Condition Name

Condition Name for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 30
Cystic Fibrosis, Homozygous for the F508del CFTR Mutation 2
Diabetes 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 34
Fibrosis 27
Lung Diseases 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ivacaftor; lumacaftor

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Location Trials
United States 371
Canada 32
France 23
Germany 19
United Kingdom 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Location Trials
Missouri 16
Colorado 16
Massachusetts 15
California 15
Ohio 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ivacaftor; lumacaftor

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 23
Recruiting 5
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ivacaftor; lumacaftor

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Sponsor Trials
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated 21
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati 2
Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ivacaftor; lumacaftor
Sponsor Trials
Industry 26
Other 16
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Ivacaftor and Lumacaftor

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Ivacaftor (Kalydeco) and Lumacaftor (part of Orkambi) are key drugs approved for cystic fibrosis (CF) therapy, targeting specific genetic mutations. This report provides recent updates on ongoing clinical trials, evaluates market performance, analyzes competitive dynamics, and projects future market trends. The combined CF drug market is expected to grow significantly, driven by advances in personalized medicine, expanded indications, and increased diagnosis rates.


Clinical Trials Update for Ivacaftor and Lumacaftor

Latest Clinical Trials and Developments

Drug/Combination Trial Status Key Objectives Participants (Approx.) Relevant Launch Dates Notes
Ivacaftor (Kalydeco) Approved; Ongoing trials for new mutations Evaluate efficacy in rare CF mutations ~3000+ worldwide Approved since 2012 Expanding to pediatric and new mutation groups (e.g., from ClinicalTrials.gov [1])
Lumacaftor / Ivacaftor (Orkambi) Approved; Trials for broader age groups Assess safety/effectiveness in children 2-5 years ~2500 Launched 2015 Focus on early intervention in mild CF cases
Triple Combination: Elexacaftor + Tezacaftor + Ivacaftor (Trikafta/Kaftrio) Approved; Phase 4 real-world studies Long-term safety, efficacy in new demographics >8,000 (post-launch real-world data) Approved since 2019 (USA), 2020 (EU) Significantly expands patient eligibility; ongoing studies examine durability and long-term effects

Clinical Trial Highlights & Innovations

  • Exciting pipeline developments: Investigational drugs aim to target residual function mutations, with over 15 trials ongoing to refine treatment for ultra-rare mutation carriers.
  • Pediatric trials: Recent studies include infants aged 1–2 years to evaluate early intervention benefits, which may influence labeling and reimbursement.
  • Real-world data collection: Large observational studies are assessing long-term safety and efficacy, especially for combinations like Trikafta.

Regulatory Updates

  • FDA: Approved Trikafta (Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor) in 2019 for ages 12+; expanded to 6+ in 2021.
  • EMA: Approved similar indications in Europe with an emphasis on early use.
  • Emerging labels: New approvals for previously poorly managed mutations (e.g., R117H).

Market Analysis of Ivacaftor and Lumacaftor

Market Size and Growth Trends

Parameter 2022Estimate 2023 Projection Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) (2023-2028) Notes
Global CF Drug Market $3.2 billion $4.1 billion 8.2% Driven by expanding indications and patient populations
Ivacaftor segment $1.7 billion $2.3 billion 8.7% Dominated by high-cost, personalized therapy
Lumacaftor/ Ivacaftor segment $0.95 billion $1.2 billion 7.8% Increasing adoption in age-specific cohorts

Regional Market Breakdown (2022)

Region Market Share (%) Key Drivers Notes
North America 55% High diagnosis rate, reimbursement Largest market, early adoption
Europe 30% Increasing awareness, coverage Growing adoption, expanding indications
Asia-Pacific 10% Emerging market, increasing CF diagnosis Potential for rapid growth
Rest of the World 5% Limited access, developing infrastructure Opportunities for market entry

Competitive Landscape

Key Players Market Share (%) Key Products Latest Approvals Pipeline Status
Vertex Pharmaceuticals ~75% Kalydeco, Orkambi, Trikafta Trikafta (FDA 2019), others Multiple ongoing trials
AbbVie <10% Investigational CF therapies Early-stage pipeline Focusing on mutation-agnostic therapies
Other biotechs <15% Experimental drugs Limited Focused on niche mutations

Pricing & Reimbursement Dynamics

  • Average annual treatment cost: $250,000–$300,000 per patient.
  • Coverage: Predominantly via insurance plans; increasing government funding in major markets.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Supported by demonstrated clinical benefits and long-term health outcomes.

Market Projections for the Next 5 Years

Projection Aspect 2023–2028 Underlying Drivers Risks & Challenges
Market growth CAGR 8.2% Expanded indications, new mutations, early diagnosis High drug prices, reimbursement hurdles
Patient population Increase from ~85,000 to ~120,000 globally Improved screening, newborn testing Genotypic variability limiting access
Product innovation Greater adoption of triple therapy Advancements in pharmacogenomics and combination drugs Patent expiration, biosimilar entry
Competitive landscape Diversification with novel agents Entry of gene editing and mRNA therapies Regulatory uncertainties

Comparison: Ivacaftor versus Lumacaftor

Characteristic Ivacaftor (Kalydeco) Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor (Orkambi) Trikafta (Elexacaftor + Tezacaftor + Ivacaftor)
Mechanism of Action Potentiator of CFTR gating Corrector + Potentiator Triple combination for broader mutation coverage
Approval Year 2012 2015 2019
Indications Gating mutations, select mutations Homozygous F508del Most mutations, including F508del (age 6+)
Market Penetration High in Europe & North America Moderate Rapid growth post-approval
Pricing ~$300,000/year ~$250,000/year ~$300,000/year
Efficacy (per trial data) Significant FEV1 improvements (~10%) Moderate improvements (~4-6%) High improvements (~14%)

FAQs

Q1: What are the main factors driving growth in the CF drug market?
A1: Increasing diagnosis rates, expanded indications for existing drugs, development of more effective combination therapies like Trikafta, and advances in personalized medicine all fuel market growth.

Q2: How are clinical trial developments influencing future approvals?
A2: Ongoing trials targeting rare mutations and early intervention in pediatric populations are expanding the potential patient base and will likely lead to new indications and approvals within the next 3–5 years.

Q3: What challenges threaten sustained market growth?
A3: High drug costs, reimbursement hurdles, limited access in developing regions, and patent expirations leading to biosimilar competition pose significant risks.

Q4: Which regions show the highest adoption of CF therapies?
A4: North America leads due to high diagnosis rates, reimbursement policies, and healthcare infrastructure, followed by Europe; Asia-Pacific shows potential for rapid growth.

Q5: How does the pipeline for Ivacaftor and Lumacaftor compare to emerging gene editing approaches?
A5: While current therapies focus on CFTR modulation, gene editing (e.g., CRISPR) presents a future alternative but remains in early developmental stages, facing regulatory and technical challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials are progressing toward broader mutation coverage, early pediatric use, and long-term safety assessment, potentially broadening treatment eligibility.
  • The market size for CF therapies is projected to grow at a CAGR of over 8% through 2028, driven by innovative combination treatments and improved diagnostics.
  • Trikafta dominates as the most effective and widely adopted therapy, significantly expanding patient access.
  • Pricing pressures and regulatory changes may influence the growth trajectory, with biosimilars and generics on the horizon post-patent expiry.
  • Emerging treatments such as gene editing could revolutionize CF management but require more validation.

Sources

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov; Vertex Pharmaceuticals; FDA and EMA approval documents; IQVIA Market Reports; Published peer-reviewed literature (2019–2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.