You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 20, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BRINCIDOFOVIR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for brincidofovir

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00793598 ↗ CMX001 in Post-transplant Patients With BK Virus Viruria Completed Chimerix Phase 1/Phase 2 2009-11-01 This was a randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose placebo-controlled study of oral brincidofovir (BCV) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and renal transplant recipients with BK virus viruria.
NCT00942305 ↗ Study of CMX001 to Prevent/Control Cytomegalovirus Infection in R+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Completed Chimerix Phase 2 2009-10-01 This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of brincidofovir (BCV) administered orally once or twice weekly for up to 11 weeks. Dosing was initiated immediately following engraftment (between Days 14-30 post-transplant) to prevent/control cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or prevent disease in R+ hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients.
NCT01143181 ↗ Study to Assess Brincidofovir Treatment of Serious Diseases or Conditions Caused by Double-stranded DNA Viruses Completed Chimerix Phase 3 2010-12-01 This was a multicenter, open-label study of oral brincidofovir (BCV) treatment of serious disease or conditions caused by double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus(es). Subjects received either a weight-based or a fixed dose of oral BCV once weekly (QW) or twice weekly (BIW) for up to 3 months until clinical disease was resolved or stabilized and/or viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction testing was negative for 4 consecutive weeks, whichever was longer. Under the first protocol amendment, adults and adolescents (≥13 years) received 200 mg or 300 mg BCV BIW (not to exceed 4 mg/kg total weekly dose) depending on the difficulty of treating their disease (i.e., Group 1 or Group 2, respectively), and pediatric subjects (≤12 years) received 4 mg/kg BCV BIW. Under the second protocol amendment, adults and adolescents (≥13 years), regardless of viral infection/disease, had a maximum weekly dose of 200 mg, i.e., 200 mg QW or 100 mg BIW; not to exceed 4mg/kg total weekly dose. Pediatric subjects (≤12 years), regardless of viral infection/disease, had a maximum weekly dose of 4 mg/kg, i.e., 4 mg/kg QW or 2 mg/kg BIW; not to exceed 200 mg.
NCT01241344 ↗ Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Brincidofovir for the Prevention of Adenovirus Disease Completed Chimerix Phase 2 2010-11-01 This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of preemptive treatment with oral brincidofovir (BCV), as compared to placebo, for the prevention of adenovirus (AdV) disease in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) with asymptomatic AdV viremia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for brincidofovir

Condition Name

Condition Name for brincidofovir
Intervention Trials
Adenovirus 4
Cytomegalovirus Disease 2
Adenovirus Infection 2
Hepatic Impairment 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for brincidofovir
Intervention Trials
Adenoviridae Infections 7
Infections 5
Communicable Diseases 4
Virus Diseases 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for brincidofovir

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for brincidofovir
Location Trials
United States 206
United Kingdom 5
Canada 4
Spain 3
Japan 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for brincidofovir
Location Trials
California 14
North Carolina 11
New York 10
Massachusetts 10
Illinois 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for brincidofovir

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for brincidofovir
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for brincidofovir
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Terminated 5
Withdrawn 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for brincidofovir

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for brincidofovir
Sponsor Trials
Chimerix 16
SymBio Pharmaceuticals 4
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for brincidofovir
Sponsor Trials
Industry 21
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Brincidofovir

Last updated: November 8, 2025


Introduction

Brincidofovir (commercially known as Tembexa among other names) is an oral antiviral medication developed by Chimerix Inc. It is a lipid conjugate of cidofovir designed to treat a spectrum of DNA virus infections, including smallpox, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and other orthopoxvirus-related diseases. Given its strategic importance in biodefense and emerging infectious disease management, understanding its clinical development, market trajectory, and future projections is vital for pharmaceutical companies, investors, and policymakers.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Brincidofovir

Current Status and Ongoing Studies

Brincidofovir’s development pipeline has experienced a complex trajectory shaped by efficacy data, safety concerns, and regulatory feedback. As of late 2022, the compound has received FDA approval in 2021 for smallpox treatment under the FDA’s Animal Efficacy Rule, given the infeasibility of human clinical trials for such a rare disease. However, for other indications such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Ebola, clinical trials remain pivotal.

  • Smallpox Indication:
    The FDA approved Tembexa for preventing smallpox in adult and pediatric populations at high risk, based on non-human primate and rabbit model studies, with supportive data from limited human safety trials. The approval marked a significant milestone, positioning Brincidofovir as a critical biodefense asset.

  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV):
    Phase III trials focused on hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Results published in clinical journals indicate that Brincidofovir demonstrates comparable efficacy to valganciclovir but with a different safety profile, especially concerning gastrointestinal side effects. However, the program faced challenges with adverse events, which tempered enthusiasm for broader approval.

  • Ebola and Filovirus Infections:
    Multiple phase II/III trials, including the PREVAIL II trial during the West African Ebola outbreak, studied brincidofovir. Results showed limited efficacy, with some safety concerns related to gastrointestinal toxicity and hepatotoxicity, leading to a reevaluation of its role in Ebola treatment.

Regulatory and Development Challenges

The clinical trajectory has been punctuated by safety concerns—primarily gastrointestinal issues such as diarrhea and elevated liver enzymes—resulting in trial modifications and dosage adjustments. Regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA have responded cautiously, emphasizing the need for comprehensive safety data before broader approvals.

Recent Developments

In 2022, Chimerix announced plans to initiate new trials focusing on antiviral activity against emerging pathogens. The company is also exploring combination therapies to improve safety and efficacy profiles.


Market Analysis

Market Drivers

  • Biodefense Preparedness:
    The FDA approval for smallpox treatment underscores biodefense implications, positioning Brincidofovir as a strategic stockpiling drug for government agencies such as BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority).

  • Antiviral Demand:
    The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic accelerated interest in broad-spectrum antivirals, though Brincidofovir’s activity is limited to DNA viruses. Nevertheless, its framework supports potential rapid deployment against emerging DNA viral threats.

  • Limited Competition:
    Currently, few direct alternatives target orthopoxviruses; Tecovirimat (marketed as TPOXX) is the primary competitor, approved for smallpox. Brincidofovir's advantages include oral dosing and broader antiviral activity, which could facilitate market penetration.

Market Size and Segments

  • Smallpox:
    Although eradicated, smallpox remains a biothreat, with stockpiling policies in place globally. The US government allocated significant funds for procurement; recent estimates by CDC suggest procurement contracts worth over $40 million (e.g., BARDA). The projected stockpile size may influence a recurring market of approximately 1-2 million doses globally.

  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV):
    The global CMV treatment market was valued at approximately $4 billion in 2022, with antivirals like valganciclovir dominating. Brincidofovir, if approved, would compete in niche segments or as an alternative for patients intolerant to current therapies.

  • Other DNA Viruses:
    Limited therapeutic options exist for viruses like adenoviruses, polyomaviruses, etc., representing potential future markets if efficacy and safety are established.

Market Barriers

  • Safety Profile:
    Gastrointestinal toxicity and hepatotoxicity have limited broader adoption. Regulatory restrictions hinder access outside prioritized indications.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement:
    As a drug with biodefense status, pricing strategies tend to be privileged within government contracts; commercial markets may require demonstration of superior safety and efficacy.

  • Competition:
    Tecovirimat holds a clear leadership position in smallpox treatment. Brincidofovir’s position relies on its broad-spectrum potential and safety improvements.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short-Term (1-3 Years)

The immediate market for Brincidofovir remains tightly linked to biodefense preparedness and specific niches such as transplant-related CMV. The US government’s continued investment in biodefense stockpiles and potential new clinical trials for CMV could sustain low double-digit million-dollar sales, primarily driven by government procurement.

  • Key Opportunities:

    • Expanded safety profiling to mitigate gastrointestinal side effects.
    • FDA approvals for CMV or other indications as safety data mature.
    • Strategic partnerships to expand indications or formulations.
  • Challenges:

    • Addressing adverse events that limit broad use.
    • Competition from Tecovirimat for smallpox.

Medium to Long-Term (3-10 Years)

Potential growth hinges on multiple factors:

  • Approval for Additional Indications:
    Demonstrating efficacy against other DNA viruses like adenoviruses or polyomaviruses could generate new revenue streams.

  • Market Expansion:
    If safety profiles improve through formulation or dosing changes, broader commercial adoption may occur, especially in immunocompromised populations.

  • Emerging Infectious Diseases:
    Mobilization during outbreaks of novel or re-emerging DNA viruses could stimulate rapid deployment and sales.

  • Biodefense Investment Continuity:
    Persistent threat perception assures continuous demand from government agencies, providing a baseline revenue.

Competitive Outlook

Brincidofovir faces competition primarily from Tecovirimat in smallpox indication, which is more targeted with a favorable safety profile. Nonetheless, Brincidofovir’s broader antiviral spectrum offers a competitive edge if safety concerns are mitigated. Its role as a broad-spectrum antiviral with biodefense backing ensures a niche, albeit limited, market dominance for specific indications.


Key Takeaways

  • Brincidofovir has achieved FDA approval for smallpox under a scenario driven by biodefense needs rather than broad clinical efficacy, constraining its commercial attractiveness yet emphasizing strategic importance.

  • Ongoing clinical challenges, primarily related to safety, limit broad deployment in other indications like CMV and Ebola, but future formulation improvements could expand its utility.

  • The drug’s primary market remains in biodefense stockpiling, with limited commercial segments for other DNA viruses, constricted by safety concerns and competition.

  • Future growth prospects depend on safety profile enhancements, successful clinical trial results for additional indications, and government support.

  • Competitive landscape favors Tecovirimat for smallpox, but Brincidofovir’s broad-spectrum potential holds strategic promise if safety hurdles are overcome.


FAQs

1. What are the primary indications approved for Brincidofovir?
Brincidofovir is FDA-approved for the treatment of smallpox in high-risk populations, primarily under biodefense provisions. Its use in other indications like CMV and Ebola is investigational or off-label.

2. How does Brincidofovir compare safety-wise to cidofovir?
Brincidofovir was designed to reduce cidofovir's nephrotoxicity; however, gastrointestinal side effects such as diarrhea and hepatotoxicity have been reported, posing safety challenges.

3. What is the forecast for Brincidofovir’s market growth in the next five years?
Market growth is expected to remain modest, driven largely by biodefense stockpiling and niche antiviral markets. Broader commercialization hinges on safety improvements and successful replication of efficacy data.

4. Are there any regulatory developments that could impact Brincidofovir’s market?
Yes. Positive safety and efficacy data could lead to additional FDA approvals, whereas safety concerns could restrict its use further or prompt label modifications.

5. What are the main competitors of Brincidofovir?
Tecovirimat is the primary competitor for smallpox treatment. For other indications such as CMV, existing drugs include ganciclovir and valganciclovir, which are widely used but have different safety profiles.


References

[1] Chimerix Inc. Clinical trial reports and press releases, 2022.
[2] FDA approval documents for Tembexa, 2021.
[3] CDC and BARDA procurement and stockpiling updates, 2022.
[4] Market research reports on antiviral drugs and biodefense market analysis, 2022.
[5] Scientific publications on brincidofovir safety and efficacy trials, 2020-2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.