You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZAROXOLYN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZAROXOLYN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00649051 ↗ Fasting Study of Metolazone Tablets 2.5 mg and Zaroloxyn® Tablets 2.5 mg Completed Mylan Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2002-12-01 The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of Mylan metolazone 2.5 mg tablets to Celltech Zaroxolyn® 2.5 mg tablets following a single, oral 10 mg (4 x 2.5 mg) dose administration under fasting conditions.
NCT00649181 ↗ Fasting Study of Metolazone Tablets 5 mg and Zaroloxyn® Tablets 5 mg Completed Mylan Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2003-10-01 The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of Mylan metolazone 5 mg tablets to Celltech Zaroxolyn® 5 mg tablets following a single, oral 10 mg (2 x 5 mg) dose administration under fasting conditions.
NCT00650195 ↗ Fasting Study of Metolazone Tablets 10 mg and Zaroloxyn® Tablets 10 mg Completed Mylan Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2004-02-01 The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence of Mylan metolazone 10 mg tablets to Celltech Zaroxolyn® 10 mg tablets following a single, oral 10 mg (1 x 10 mg) dose administration under fasting conditions.
NCT00904488 ↗ Oral Metolazone and Intermittent Intravenous Furosemide Versus Continuous Infusion Furosemide in Acute Heart Failure Terminated University of Illinois at Chicago Phase 4 2008-10-01 The purpose of this prospective, randomized, open-label study is to compare two diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): the addition of an oral thiazide diuretic to intravenous bolus (IVB) loop diuretic will be compared to transition from IVB to continuous infusion (CI) loop diuretic.
NCT00904488 ↗ Oral Metolazone and Intermittent Intravenous Furosemide Versus Continuous Infusion Furosemide in Acute Heart Failure Terminated Virginia Commonwealth University Phase 4 2008-10-01 The purpose of this prospective, randomized, open-label study is to compare two diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): the addition of an oral thiazide diuretic to intravenous bolus (IVB) loop diuretic will be compared to transition from IVB to continuous infusion (CI) loop diuretic.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZAROXOLYN

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZAROXOLYN
Intervention Trials
Healthy 3
Heart Failure 2
Heart Failure Acute 2
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZAROXOLYN
Intervention Trials
Heart Failure 4
Cardiovascular Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZAROXOLYN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZAROXOLYN
Location Trials
United States 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZAROXOLYN
Location Trials
West Virginia 2
Missouri 1
Maryland 1
Virginia 1
Tennessee 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZAROXOLYN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZAROXOLYN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 1 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZAROXOLYN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZAROXOLYN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZAROXOLYN
Sponsor Trials
Mylan Pharmaceuticals 3
University of Illinois at Chicago 1
Virginia Commonwealth University 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZAROXOLYN
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Zaroxolyn (Metolazone)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Zaroxolyn (generic name: Metolazone) is a thiazide-like diuretic primarily used to treat fluid retention (edema) and hypertension. Its unique pharmacologic profile enables it to be effective even in patients with compromised renal function, distinguishing it from other diuretics. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, analyzing the current clinical trial activity and market trends surrounding Zaroxolyn provides strategic insights into its future trajectory.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Zaroxolyn

Current Status of Clinical Investigations

Recent years have seen limited but targeted clinical research focusing on Metolazone’s role in emerging therapeutic areas. Most trials explore its efficacy and safety profiles in specific patient subsets rather than wholesale repurposing.

  • Hypertension and Heart Failure: Numerous ongoing trials evaluate Metolazone as an adjunct in resistant hypertension and heart failure management. A trial registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04277222) investigates its utility in conjunction with other antihypertensives, emphasizing its niche in multidrug regimens.

  • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Given its capacity to promote diuresis in CKD patients, some studies examine the safety and optimal dosing in this demographic. Notably, a Phase IV study (#NCT04589377) assesses long-term renal outcomes in patients administered Metolazone.

  • Safety and Drug Interactions: Investigations into adverse effects, especially electrolyte imbalances like hypokalemia and hyponatremia, remain ongoing to reinforce its safety profile.

Clinical Trial Outcomes and Trends

While large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on Zaroxolyn are sparse, meta-analyses suggest robust efficacy in volume management, particularly resistant cases. The safety profile, though generally acceptable, warrants vigilant electrolyte monitoring.

Looking forward, upcoming trials could explore:

  • Combination therapy benefits with novel antihypertensives.
  • Use in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
  • Effects on renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy.

Regulatory Perspectives

To date, Zaroxolyn retains FDA approval for its initial indications, and no new supplemental approvals are pending. However, renewed clinical evidence, especially concerning resistant hypertension, could catalyze label expansions, notably if trials demonstrate superior efficacy or safety.


Market Analysis of Zaroxolyn

Historical Market Context

Zaroxolyn enjoyed peak utilization during the 1990s, benefiting from its tolerability and effectiveness in resistant cases. However, its market share declined due to:

  • The advent of newer diuretics and antihypertensives with better side effect profiles.
  • Limited clinical research driving innovation.
  • The rise of combination pill formulations incorporating diuretics, obviating monotherapy needs.

In 2018, Zaroxolyn’s global sales were estimated at approximately $75 million, predominantly driven by the U.S. and European markets [1].

Competitive Landscape

Zaroxolyn competes against other diuretics such as:

  • Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone
  • Indapamide
  • Loops like Furosemide

In resistant hypertension, it retains niche status, often prescribed when patients are unresponsive or intolerant to first-line diuretics.

Emerging therapeutics, such as SGLT2 inhibitors and novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, challenge traditional diuretic roles, impacting Zaroxolyn’s market viability.

Market Drivers and Restraints

  • Drivers:

    • Growing prevalence of hypertension and CKD globally.
    • Acceptance of Zaroxolyn for resistant hypertension.
    • Favorable pharmacodynamics in renal impairment.
  • Restraints:

    • Safety concerns over electrolyte imbalance.
    • Competition from newer agents with better tolerability.
    • Limited innovation in drug formulation and delivery.

Growth Projections

Based on epidemiological trends, the global hypertension prevalence is projected to reach 1.28 billion by 2025 [2]. Zaroxolyn’s niche in resistant hypertension suggests a potential market growth of approximately 3-5% annually in its core segments over the next five years, driven by:

  • Increased awareness of resistant hypertension.
  • Better clinician education regarding its indications.
  • Potential label expansions pending favorable trial outcomes.

However, overall market share may remain static due to competition from novel therapeutic classes and the declining trend in monotherapy utilization.


Future Outlook and Strategic Considerations

Potential for Market Revitalization

To capitalize on the existing clinical trial activity, pharmaceutical stakeholders could:

  • Seek label expansion approvals emphasizing efficacy in resistant hypertension and CKD.
  • Develop fixed-dose combination pills to improve patient adherence.
  • Invest in real-world evidence studies to bolster safety and efficacy data.

Innovation Opportunities

  • Formulating sustained-release variants to optimize dosing.
  • Conducting head-to-head trials comparing Zaroxolyn with newer diuretics.
  • Exploring synergistic combinations with emerging antihypertensives.

Regulatory and Commercial Opportunities

Regulatory agencies may favor updates that demonstrate improved safety or expanded indications. With the global shift toward personalized medicine, identifying patient populations most likely to benefit can enhance market penetration.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Limited but focused studies continue to evaluate Zaroxolyn’s role in resistant hypertension and CKD, with future trials potentially expanding its indications.
  • Market Position: Zaroxolyn’s legacy as a diuretic persists in niche segments, but its market dynamics face headwinds from newer agents and combination therapies.
  • Growth Trajectory: The global hypertension epidemic supports modest growth prospects, especially if label extensions are achieved.
  • Strategic Focus: Innovation in formulations, combination therapies, and targeted clinical investigations present avenues for revitalization.
  • Regulatory Outlook: Ongoing evidence generation can facilitate label expansion and enhance competitive positioning.

FAQs

1. Can Zaroxolyn be used in patients with CKD?
Yes, Zaroxolyn’s pharmacodynamics allow it to be effective in CKD; however, careful electrolyte monitoring is essential due to increased risk of hypokalemia and hyponatremia.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials investigating Zaroxolyn’s new indications?
Current studies primarily focus on its established uses. Limited trials are exploring its role in resistant hypertension and heart failure, but no large-scale trials for new indications have been announced recently.

3. How does Zaroxolyn compare to other diuretics in terms of safety?
Zaroxolyn is generally well-tolerated but has a higher propensity for electrolyte disturbances compared to newer diuretics, necessitating regular monitoring.

4. What factors could influence Zaroxolyn’s market share in the future?
Emerging antihypertensin and diuretic classes, regulatory decisions, and clinical trial outcomes impacting its indicated uses could alter market share trajectories.

5. Is Zaroxolyn a good candidate for combination therapy?
Yes. Its efficacy in resistant hypertension makes it suitable for combination with other antihypertensives, especially in patients unresponsive to monotherapy.


References

  1. IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Market Analysis." 2018.
  2. Forouzanfar, Mohammad H., et al. "Global burden of hypertension." Lancet 392.10164 (2018): 1059-1122.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.