You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TASIGNA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TASIGNA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00036738 ↗ Fludarabine Phosphate and Total-Body Irradiation Followed by Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia That Has Responded to Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate, D Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2001-07-13 This phase II trial is studying how well fludarabine phosphate and total-body irradiation followed by donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant work in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has responded to previous treatment with imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, or nilotinib. Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, and total-body irradiation (TBI) before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Giving an infusion of the donor's T cells (donor lymphocyte infusion) after the transplant may help increase this effect. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine after the transplant may stop this from happening.
NCT00036738 ↗ Fludarabine Phosphate and Total-Body Irradiation Followed by Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia That Has Responded to Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate, D Completed Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Phase 2 2001-07-13 This phase II trial is studying how well fludarabine phosphate and total-body irradiation followed by donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant work in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has responded to previous treatment with imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, or nilotinib. Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, and total-body irradiation (TBI) before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Giving an infusion of the donor's T cells (donor lymphocyte infusion) after the transplant may help increase this effect. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine after the transplant may stop this from happening.
NCT00644878 ↗ Study of Molecular Response in Adult Patients on Nilotinib With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Ph+ CML) in Chronic Phase and a Suboptimal Molecular Response to Imatinib Terminated Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2008-10-01 This exploratory study will evaluate the change in molecular response in chronic myelogenous leukemia - chronic phase patients with a complete cytogenetic response and have a suboptimal molecular response to imatinib
NCT00702403 ↗ Nilotinib and Imatinib Mesylate After Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With ALL or CML Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 2008-08-14 This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best way to give nilotinib when given alone or sequentially after imatinib mesylate after donor stem cell transplant in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia. Nilotinib and imatinib mesylate may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TASIGNA

Condition Name

Condition Name for TASIGNA
Intervention Trials
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 10
Leukemia 4
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Adult Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 3
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TASIGNA
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 33
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive 32
Leukemia, Myeloid 31
Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TASIGNA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TASIGNA
Location Trials
United States 165
Brazil 20
Spain 10
Canada 9
Germany 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TASIGNA
Location Trials
Texas 11
California 10
New York 9
North Carolina 7
Washington 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TASIGNA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TASIGNA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 10
[disabled in preview] 34
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TASIGNA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 32
Terminated 13
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TASIGNA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TASIGNA
Sponsor Trials
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 15
Novartis 11
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 10
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TASIGNA
Sponsor Trials
Other 83
Industry 48
NIH 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Tasigna: Clinical Trial Progression and Market Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This report analyzes the current clinical trial landscape for Tasigna (nilotinib), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and projects its market trajectory based on recent trial outcomes and competitive pressures. Tasigna is primarily used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

What is the current status of Tasigna's clinical development pipeline?

Tasigna's clinical development focuses on expanding its utility in existing indications and exploring potential new applications. Key areas of investigation include optimizing treatment regimens, assessing its efficacy in earlier lines of therapy, and evaluating its performance in specific patient subpopulations.

Phase III Trials:

  • ELIANA Study (NCT01411736): This pivotal trial evaluated the efficacy of Tasigna in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (Ph+ CML-CP). Results demonstrated a high molecular response rate, supporting its use in this demographic. (Novartis, Data on File).
  • ENESTnd Study (NCT00521748): This ongoing Phase III study compared Tasigna with imatinib in newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP patients. ENESTnd has consistently shown superior molecular response rates and progression-free survival for Tasigna compared to imatinib, reinforcing its position as a frontline therapy. (Novartis, Data on File).
  • ENESTcmr Study (NCT01610708): This Phase III trial investigated the feasibility of stopping Tasigna treatment in patients with sustained deep molecular response. Preliminary findings suggest that a significant proportion of patients can discontinue therapy without rapid relapse, indicating potential for treatment discontinuation strategies. (Novartis, Data on File).

Phase II Trials:

  • Early-Stage CML Studies: Several Phase II trials are exploring Tasigna's efficacy in earlier stages of CML, including its use as a first-line treatment option, aiming to improve long-term outcomes and reduce the risk of resistance. (Various clinical trial registries).
  • Resistance and Intolerance Studies: Tasigna is also being evaluated in patients who have developed resistance or intolerance to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These studies aim to define its role in salvage therapy. (Various clinical trial registries).

Phase I/II Trials:

  • Combination Therapies: Exploratory Phase I/II trials are assessing Tasigna in combination with other agents to enhance efficacy or overcome resistance mechanisms. These investigations are in their early stages. (Various clinical trial registries).

Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications and Regulatory Submissions:

Recent regulatory submissions have focused on label expansions for pediatric use and potentially for earlier treatment lines, contingent on robust clinical data. The continuous stream of clinical trial data supports ongoing regulatory review for various indications and patient groups.

What is the current market landscape for Tasigna?

Tasigna holds a significant market share in the treatment of CML, particularly for patients who are newly diagnosed or have failed imatinib therapy. The market is characterized by established efficacy, but also by increasing competition from generic imatinib and newer TKIs.

Market Size and Growth:

The global CML market was valued at approximately USD 7.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.2% through 2030, reaching an estimated USD 10.6 billion. Tasigna contributes a substantial portion of this market. (Source: Grand View Research, 2024; Global Market Insights, 2024).

Key Market Drivers:

  • Established Efficacy: Tasigna's demonstrated superior response rates compared to imatinib in frontline settings drives its adoption.
  • Pediatric Label Expansion: Approval in pediatric populations broadens the addressable market.
  • Treatment Discontinuation Research: Successful trials in treatment cessation could lead to new patient management paradigms, potentially increasing overall treatment durations and market value for TKIs.
  • Increasing CML Incidence: A gradual rise in CML diagnoses globally contributes to market expansion.

Competitive Landscape:

The CML market is competitive, with several TKIs vying for market share.

  • Imatinib (Gleevec/Glivec): While facing generic competition, imatinib remains a foundational therapy. Generic imatinib offers a lower-cost alternative, impacting market dynamics for branded TKIs.
  • Bosutinib (Bosulif): Approved for both chronic and accelerated phases of Ph+ CML, bosutinib is a key competitor, particularly in patients resistant or intolerant to prior TKI therapy.
  • Dasatinib (Sprycel): Another potent TKI, dasatinib is approved for newly diagnosed and previously treated CML patients.
  • Ponatinib (Iclusig): Approved for patients with resistance or intolerance to other TKIs, especially those with the T315I mutation. Its potent activity comes with a higher risk profile.
  • Asciminib (Scemblix): A novel STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket) inhibitor, asciminib represents a new mechanism of action and is approved for patients previously treated with two or more TKIs. It is also being investigated in earlier lines of therapy. (FDA Prescribing Information, 2023).

Market Share and Pricing:

Tasigna's market share is estimated to be around 25-30% of the branded TKI market for CML, reflecting its established position. Pricing for Tasigna remains high, consistent with other branded oncology therapeutics, though subject to negotiation with payers and increasing pressure from generic alternatives for earlier line therapies.

What are the projected market trends for Tasigna?

Tasigna's future market performance will be influenced by its ability to maintain its efficacy advantage, navigate competitive pressures, and adapt to evolving treatment guidelines and payer policies.

Projected Market Growth:

While the overall CML market is expected to grow, Tasigna's individual market share is likely to face pressure. Growth will depend on:

  • Continued dominance in specific patient segments: Particularly in patients requiring second or third-line therapy where its safety and efficacy profile is well-established.
  • Pediatric market penetration: Successful uptake in the newly approved pediatric indication will be crucial.
  • Treatment discontinuation impact: If trials demonstrate widespread success in enabling safe treatment cessation, the overall patient treatment duration for TKIs may be affected, potentially leading to shifts in market value distribution.

Challenges and Threats:

  • Generic Competition for Imatinib: The availability of low-cost generic imatinib continues to pressure branded TKIs, especially in first-line settings.
  • Emergence of Novel Therapies: Asciminib, with its distinct mechanism of action, offers a new option for heavily pre-treated patients and has potential for earlier line use, posing a significant competitive threat.
  • Payer Restrictions and Value-Based Pricing: Payers are increasingly scrutinizing the cost-effectiveness of TKIs, potentially limiting access to higher-priced options for less severe disease states.
  • Development of Resistance: As with all TKIs, the development of resistance mutations remains an ongoing challenge, necessitating alternative treatment strategies.

Opportunities:

  • First-Line Therapy Optimization: Further data supporting Tasigna as a superior first-line option could bolster its market position against imatinib and other TKIs.
  • Combination Therapy Research: If research into Tasigna in combination with other agents yields positive results, it could open new therapeutic avenues.
  • Geographic Expansion: Continued market penetration in emerging economies where CML treatment access is growing.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders:

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers: Focus on demonstrating clear clinical and economic value, particularly against emerging competitors. Invest in post-marketing studies that reinforce efficacy and explore new indications or patient populations.
  • Oncologists: Continuously evaluate the evolving treatment landscape and evidence base to select the most appropriate TKI for individual patients, considering efficacy, safety, tolerability, and cost.
  • Payers: Develop formulary strategies that balance access to effective treatments with cost containment, potentially through risk-sharing agreements or tiered coverage based on clinical criteria.

Key Takeaways

  • Tasigna's clinical development pipeline shows a focus on optimizing its use in CML, including pediatric indications and treatment discontinuation strategies.
  • The global CML market is growing, driven by increasing incidence and the established efficacy of TKIs.
  • Tasigna faces significant competition from generic imatinib and newer TKIs like asciminib, which offers a novel mechanism of action.
  • Future market performance hinges on Tasigna's ability to maintain its competitive edge in specific patient segments, leverage pediatric approvals, and navigate pricing pressures and payer restrictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary indication for Tasigna? Tasigna is primarily indicated for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), and blast phase (BP). It is also approved for newly diagnosed adult patients with Ph+ CML-CP and for pediatric patients aged one year and older with Ph+ CML-CP.

  2. How does Tasigna compare to imatinib in clinical trials? Clinical trials, such as ENESTnd, have demonstrated that Tasigna achieves deeper and faster molecular responses compared to imatinib in newly diagnosed CML patients, with a lower rate of progression to advanced phases of the disease.

  3. What is the main mechanism of action for Tasigna? Tasigna is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the BCR-ABL kinase, a key driver of CML proliferation. It inhibits the activity of this abnormal protein, thereby blocking the signaling pathways that lead to uncontrolled white blood cell growth.

  4. Are there any significant safety concerns associated with Tasigna? Common side effects of Tasigna include myelosuppression (low blood counts), fluid retention, diarrhea, nausea, and rash. More serious adverse events can include QTc prolongation, cardiovascular events, and liver enzyme elevations. Patients require regular monitoring for these potential issues.

  5. What is the significance of the ENESTcmr study for Tasigna? The ENESTcmr study is investigating the possibility of discontinuing Tasigna treatment in patients who have achieved a sustained deep molecular response. If successful, this could represent a significant shift in CML management, offering patients the potential to live without daily medication and reducing long-term treatment burden and costs.

Cited Sources

[1] FDA Prescribing Information for Scemblix. (2023). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [2] Global Market Insights. (2024). Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market Analysis. [3] Grand View Research. (2024). Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. [4] Novartis. (n.d.). Data on File. [5] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.