Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM HEPARIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SODIUM HEPARIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00203580 ↗ Trial of the Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Warfarin on Mortality in the Long-Term Treatment of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Main LITE Study) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 4 1994-12-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus the standard care use of intravenous heparin followed by oral warfarin sodium.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SODIUM HEPARIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for SODIUM HEPARIN
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 4
Interstitial Cystitis 3
End Stage Renal Disease 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SODIUM HEPARIN
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 10
Acute Kidney Injury 6
Venous Thrombosis 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SODIUM HEPARIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SODIUM HEPARIN
Location Trials
United States 35
Germany 11
Spain 10
Italy 10
Brazil 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SODIUM HEPARIN
Location Trials
New York 6
California 5
Texas 3
Ohio 3
Georgia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SODIUM HEPARIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SODIUM HEPARIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SODIUM HEPARIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 44
Unknown status 11
Withdrawn 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SODIUM HEPARIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SODIUM HEPARIN
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Ain Shams University 4
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SODIUM HEPARIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 122
Industry 28
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 1, 2026

Sodium Heparin (Unfractionated Heparin): Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is sodium heparin and where does it fit clinically?

Sodium heparin is the sodium salt of unfractionated heparin (UFH), an established anticoagulant used for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. In modern hospital care, UFH’s role is strongest where rapid onset and reversibility, monitoring flexibility, and use in special populations (for example, peri-procedural settings) matter.

Typical clinical use categories

  • Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE): Treatment bridging to longer-acting anticoagulation or continued inpatient management.
  • Acute coronary syndromes and unstable angina: Standard anticoagulation component in inpatient cardiology pathways.
  • Peri-procedural and peri-operative anticoagulation: Including bridging strategies and anticoagulation during certain procedures.
  • Thrombosis prevention in hospitalized patients: VTE prophylaxis in settings where UFH is selected over alternatives.

Regulatory and product reality Sodium heparin is widely marketed as a generic or reference UFH product across multiple jurisdictions. The development and differentiation that matter for “clinical trials update” and “market projection” in sodium heparin usually come from:

  • label expansions in specific indications or populations,
  • formulation/bioequivalence differentiation,
  • manufacturing continuity and supply resilience,
  • pricing pressure from generics and biosimilar-like competitive logic for biologically sourced drugs (even though UFH is not a “biosimilar” in the strict regulatory sense).

What clinical trials are active for sodium heparin?

No reliable, single, up-to-date global clinical-trial dataset can be produced from the information available in this chat. A complete and accurate “clinical trials update” requires a current registry sweep (for example ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP) with query-by-substance normalization (UFH, heparin sodium, heparin sodium injection, brand variants). Without that sweep, any listing of active or recent trials would be incomplete and potentially wrong.

Result: A complete clinical trials update cannot be issued with accuracy under the constraints.


What is the current market size and structure for sodium heparin?

Sodium heparin sits in a mature anticoagulant market with heavy generic competition. Market dynamics are dominated by:

  • hospital formulary behavior and contracting,
  • tender-driven pricing,
  • supply assurance,
  • conversion among anticoagulants (UFH versus LMWH, fondaparinux, and factor Xa inhibitors),
  • constrained manufacturing capacity for heparin sources and purification.

Market structure (practical)

  • Supply: Multiple manufacturers supply UFH/heparin sodium via bulk API and finished-dose injections.
  • Demand: Predominantly hospital-driven; long-term outpatient demand depends on institutional protocols and payer coverage.
  • Competition: LMWH has substitution pull in many VTE prophylaxis and outpatient bridging pathways; DOACs also compete where protocols allow. UFH retains specific workflow advantages in inpatient and procedural settings.

What matters for investment-grade analysis

  • Pricing compression from generic entrants
  • Volume stability tied to hospital utilization, not uptake of new molecular entities
  • Tender cycles and national reimbursement policies
  • Manufacturing reliability and API sourcing risk

Result: A quantified market size with projections cannot be issued accurately without current market-research baselines and data sources, which are not provided in this chat.


What is the growth outlook and pricing trajectory for sodium heparin?

Sodium heparin growth is limited by:

  • maturity and generic saturation,
  • substitution by LMWH and DOACs where clinically interchangeable,
  • hospital protocol and guideline changes that shift anticoagulation selection.

Near-term drivers

  • Continued high inpatient use in cardiology and procedural care
  • Persistent need for UFH where monitoring and reversibility matter

Downside risks

  • Aggressive generic price competition
  • Competitive channel shift toward LMWH and DOACs
  • Supply and regulatory scrutiny tied to animal-derived heparin supply chains

Projection method required for accuracy A credible projection needs at minimum: current sales by geography, baseline unit consumption, expected tender-driven price decline, volume impacts from substitution, and regulatory/policy adjustments. None of those inputs are available here in a form that allows accurate, complete calculation.

Result: A quantitative growth projection cannot be issued.


How should businesses use sodium heparin’s landscape for R&D and investment decisions?

With sodium heparin being a mature, widely available molecule, actionable decision points typically center on commercial execution and regulatory strategy rather than novel mechanism claims.

Commercial strategy levers

  • Formulation and presentation: Concentration, container type, and ready-to-use workflow can affect formulary adoption even where molecules are equivalent.
  • Cost-to-hospital: Tender pricing, distribution coverage, and service level determine share more than incremental efficacy claims.
  • Supply assurance: Contract manufacturing capability and API sourcing stability are purchase criteria in many regions.

Regulatory and lifecycle levers

  • Label consistency and maintenance: Small label differences may influence eligibility in hospital protocols.
  • Bioequivalence and quality strategy: Recurrent inspection readiness and batch release reliability are critical for continuity contracts.

Key Takeaways

  • Sodium heparin is an established UFH product used primarily in inpatient anticoagulation pathways where UFH workflow advantages apply.
  • A complete clinical trials update cannot be produced accurately without current registry interrogation.
  • A quantified market analysis and projection cannot be produced accurately without current market baseline data and source-based baselines.
  • Business focus for sodium heparin is commercial execution (pricing, tendering, supply reliability) and regulatory continuity rather than mechanism innovation.

FAQs

  1. Is sodium heparin the same as unfractionated heparin?
    Yes. “Sodium heparin” typically refers to the sodium salt form of unfractionated heparin used as an injectable anticoagulant.

  2. Where is sodium heparin used most often?
    In inpatient settings for VTE treatment and cardiology indications such as acute coronary syndromes, and in peri-procedural protocols where monitoring and rapid reversal are valuable.

  3. Does sodium heparin still face competition?
    Yes. LMWH and DOACs compete for many VTE prevention and treatment indications depending on protocols and patient characteristics.

  4. What usually differentiates products when the molecule is the same?
    Concentration, presentation, quality and batch release reliability, and the ability to meet tender and hospital procurement schedules.

  5. Can there be meaningful growth for sodium heparin?
    Growth is typically constrained by maturity and substitution, so gains usually come from contract wins, formulary access, and supply continuity rather than new clinical breakthrough expansion.


References (APA)

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Study records for heparin sodium / unfractionated heparin. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. (n.d.). Heparin search results. World Health Organization. https://trialsearch.who.int/
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug approvals and labels for heparin (UFH) products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.